Jump to content

Smiths Empire RAF 1943


p2n

Recommended Posts

Came across this the other day. Think it might be a good find from what I've found on google.

Will clean it up - the mechanism seems to have been liberally coated in 3-in-1 or WD40. Thankfully not the escape or balance. It seems to run well.

Some of the original screws were rusty and someone had replaced a few so will change them all for new brass ones.

Any tips on general restoration of a clock like this welcome.

 

 

P5190007.JPG

P5190008.JPG

P5190011.JPG

P5190013.JPG

P5190020.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chopin said:

Are these the type of clocks that would be found in RAF bases/locations ?

You know about as much as I do at the moment.

All I've been able to find on google is that Smiths made a lot of this type of clock, but produced a special "RAF" version around 1942.

Most of what I know came from this site: http://designc20.com/raf-empire-43.html

 

 

Edited by p2n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two of these clocks, both dated 1943 the case is made from Bakerlite the ones I have are slightley different and have the issue date and a broad arrow on the dial and have a smiths 123 movement with the platform on top of the movement. 

They are a straight forward movement to service the only thing to watch on these Smiths platform escapements is that the regulating arm sometimes doesn't move the regulator index or will only move it one way this cause the platform to run at excessive speed gaining minutes a day. You can move the regulator arm and make no diffrence to time keeping so when you service it make sure when you move the arm the index actually moves.

The cases where made from bakerlite because a war time shortage of oak made it too valuable a commodity to waste on a clock, do not use any type of abrasive cleaner or solvent based cleaner on the case just use a good quality wax polish the finnish on bakerlite is only skin deep.

These where issued where ever they where needed so could have been in a office, op's room canteen any where some times there is a stores number painted on the back of the clocks this can make it possible to work out which R.A.F base it was issued to.

These are often described as rare which is stretching it quite a bit they where made in quite large numbers by smiths and prices on the web and Ebay seem to go from sensible to cloud cuckoo, I paid 100 pounds for one and 70 for the other quite recently. at auction houses they seem to go for a max of 300 pounds but quite often much lower

Another thing to watch is the bezels are spun brass and quite flimsy at the hinge I replaced the glass on the one I have on the wall in my living room with perspex which is much lighter and kinder to the hinge than the original glass fitted ( retain the original glass if you do this).

As far as restoration goes your clock doesn't really need any the dial is good with only minor paint loss where the dial screws go on the edge, the dials quite often suffer from rust and discolouring, do as little as possible and leave as original as possible is the only advice to give.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much to add to wis1971 excellent post.

The more expensive R A F clocks were fusee and made by Elliott, they have completely different movements. The clocks that were at the more famous airfields also fetch higher prices. 

You need to clean the platform in a watch cleaning machine to be on the safe side as all that can come apart needs to in order to do the job correctly. A mainspring winder you will need. You can clean the movement in Horolene. A little tip before removing the platform just make a tiny mark on one side and at the bottom so you will know where to put the platform back, that way you will have the same depth as before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that m/spring is wrong it is not high enough and it is tired. You need a new M/spring.

You should not remove a clock spring without a m/s winder. If you do by pulling it out of the barrel, you will pull it out of shape. When you put it back, and you wind it. It will wind out of shape; it could cause the clock to run poorly causing bad regulation, even rubbing inside the barrel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed to wind and run quite well before.

As for removing and refitting the spring - I was most worried about finishing with the same number of fingers as I started with lol.

There are quite a few of these on fleabay - they any good?

 

ms1.thumb.jpg.21f15e3c1b1458fb66f78fa629096a64.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, p2n said:

Can you link to one?

My list of things to buy is £1000000 long so I need to be frugal - I can buy better quality stuff later on.

Here you go. They are a bit pricy but it will last you a life time.

The first on the left is the type I had, mine was not made by Bergeon.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/mainspring-tools

http://www.watchtoolsonline.com/Ollie-Baker-style-Mainspring-Winder-Set-for-Clockmaker-09704.htm

This is a popular one. I think clockboy has this type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, p2n said:

Both well out of my price range for now.

Is there a way to clean the spring in situ? I know it won't be as good, but I'm going to have to work around this for now.

The answer is no.

I will tell you how you can remove the spring using a pair of pliers but I do not recommend this as it can cause problems. Its best to wear a pair of gloves, grab near the end of the spring at the arbor end and gently pull up until the spring is just higher than the barrel and un-wind it. Be very careful as doing it this way you are going to pull it out of shape, don’t pull to high as the higher you pull the more out of shape the spring will be come. Be extremely careful at the barrel end you do not want the end to twist, but you need it to unhook. You can wash the spring, barrel and arbor in petrol. Wipe the spring clean and other parts. Put the barrel end of the spring onto the hook and gently hand wind the spring back into the barrel. Oil the spring with Windles clock oil; do not forget a little in both holes where the arbor fits into the barrel. Replace the arbor making sure the arbor will wind the spring and replace the barrel cap.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory the same technique as I'd use for a pocket watch spring - just scaled up and with a significantly higher amount of stored energy and finger removing potential.

Ok - will let you know how it does and how many finger I retain after :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was much easier than I thought.

22 hours ago, oldhippy said:

I would say that m/spring is wrong it is not high enough and it is tired. You need a new M/spring.

You're right - it's a little on the tired side.

As for finding a replacement and fitting it, are the rules the same as with a pocket watch - match thickness, height and length?

If I get a new spring it's going to have more strength than this one - it it still possible to hand fit them?

 

P5210001.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That old spring has been shortened.

For a new spring, you need the height so measure from the inside of the barrel to just below where the barrel cap will fit. Then the diameter of the barrel from the inside. You do not need to bother with the strength. The spring that they will send you will have a hole or some call it an eye, make sure it hooks on right. I expect it will come wound with a strong wire. You should be able to drop it into the barrel, cut the wire and press down. You can put the arbor in, wind it by hand, and hope the end catches the barrel. Do not forget to oil it. If it does not catch, you will have to go through what I told you on how to remove the spring. Be careful many of these new springs have very sharp edges and will cut your hands.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The barrel is 40.6 mm dia and it's 25.3mm from the bottom to the lit where the lid would fit. The spring is 0.35mm thick.

Assuming I need some clearance between the spring and the top/bottom of the barrel, going for a 24mm high spring, the best match from Cousins would be: 24 x 0.40 x 1500 x 40mm (244040)

Would you think this would be the best fit, or should I pick a 23 or 25mm one?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be ordered on pay day! (I looked at my cousins account and considering I've only been playing with clocks and watches for two months I've spent a ******* lot already - maybe best not tell the missus).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in the meantime I've cleaned everything and reassembled - it's ticking nicely at the moment. Hand winding the mainspring was relatively easy - possibly due to it being shorter that it should be and weaker,

I'll let it run for a day or two and see how well it keeps time. I was told it was fast before - probably due to the globs of 3-in-1 on the hairspring lol. Mind you - all that oil seems to have limited the wear - all the pivots were ok (as far as I could judge).

I need to have another attempt at cleaning as the parts are still tarnished and have an oily patina to them. I'll get some Horolene or similar asap.

On the subject of oil and pivots - how much oil do you use with a clock? I've got my medium and fine watch oiling pins - what do you use with a clock?

Edited by p2n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
×
×
  • Create New...