Jump to content

Zodiac 86 question


Recommended Posts

An other mainspring question . Have a Zodiac with either broken mainspring or no mainspring. Haven't removed it yet. Just looking into what needs to be done. I looked at cousinuk and they say non automatic mainspring. Shouldn't it be a automatic mainspring in this movement. ranfft says it's based around the AS1687/88 . But can't find any AS 1687 on cousinuk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think these come with a sealed barrel which might explain any duff information about a mainspring. In an ideal world it's a 'barrel complete' part.

I've had a quick look around and there's a good Zodiac article here which also discusses mainspring sizes should you opt to tackle the dastardly sealed barrel: http://www.vintagezodiacs.com/zforums/index.php?topic=2134.0 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

I think these come with a sealed barrel which might explain any duff information about a mainspring. In an ideal world it's a 'barrel complete' part.

I've had a quick look around and there's a good Zodiac article here which also discusses mainspring sizes should you opt to tackle the dastardly sealed barrel: http://www.vintagezodiacs.com/zforums/index.php?topic=2134.0 

To much to read no when i am tired. But would look into it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the interesting bits from the article for your situation are:

i) The mainspring barrel specifically has "do not open" on it; a barrel complete is intended

ii) An attempt at replacing the mainspring could be made but "the edges (where the cap and barrel were crimped together) are too thin and weak and usually just warp when trying to reseal the two."

iii) Various mainspring sizes are quoted and the author of the aforementioned article has witnessed different sized mainsprings when working on these watches. The spring sizes quoted vary as: 1.25 X .11 X 10", 1.10 X .11 X 10", 1.20 X .13 X 12" and 1.20 X .13 X 12.5". :mellow:

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skit indeed. :wacko:

With parts for this calibre (whether Zodiac or AS base) being practically impossible to find I think I'd be getting out the silver solder and a fine file ... or trying to find a barrel of the same dimensions from another calibre, AS or other, and living with not having a sealed-for-life barrel!

I don't know if anyone else knows where to source this part from; I've looked at all the usual suspects and come up blank...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

Skit indeed. :wacko:

With parts for this calibre (whether Zodiac or AS base) being practically impossible to find I think I'd be getting out the silver solder and a fine file ... or trying to find a barrel of the same dimensions from another calibre, AS or other, and living with not having a sealed-for-life barrel!

I don't know if anyone else knows where to source this part from; I've looked at all the usual suspects and come up blank...

 

Not a bad idea . Problem is finding one that is automatic. Have search on similar movements i had in my drawers. But nothing comes close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
    • nevenbekriev- You nailed it with your description of me and my reaction when the clock started ticking again. I am a newbie.  I love the sound and idea of mechanical clocks but the idea of owning one and trying to keep them running has never appealed to me. My wife bought this one and an antique German wall clock.  When I looked into having someone repair them for me, the universal response was "it's really expensive to work on them, you should just replace the movement". So, I had nothing to lose, I started researching them and opened them up. The wife is happy because she hears the sound of the clocks again. But I have gone down the "accuracy" rabbit hole. In the vertical position, the balance wheel was not floating. It was sitting on the bottom of the frame. I adjusted the lower spring collet and got it floating. It easily passed the 270 degree 3 to 5 minute oscillation test. It took 8 minutes for the wheel to completely stop moving.  I put it the unit back in the movement and checked the safety pin. It does not touch the safety roller anywhere in +/-270 degrees rotation from neutral position. But the amplitude of the rotation with the spring fully wound is weak based on what you are saying. It rotates +/-90 degrees from the neutral position.  No, I did not take the movement completely apart.  That seemed way outside my skill set at the time. There is a reason I became an electrical engineer and not a mechanical engineer. I am much more comfortable with moving electrons than tiny moving metal parts. Will I do it in the long run? Anything can happen. I don't seem to be able to let it go.
    • Isn't that the same guy who told Zelenskyy to escalate the war with Russia/Putin when they already had a peace deal? 2 years later and we have half a million young Ukranian boys dead. He doesn't seem very clever...
    • Thanks guys.  quick question. For automatic movement, particularly this one. can I power down the main spring by pushing this rachet down?  i've gotten pretty used to SW210 and powering down a manual movement. But so far i've only been waiting for the auto movement to run out of juice before opening the case.     
×
×
  • Create New...