Jump to content

Sincere Lathe Threading Compatibility with the Cowells 90CW


dralexmv

Recommended Posts

I would like to understand if the threading for the accesories made for the Sincere lathe (faceplates, chucks, collets, etc) are compatible with the Cowells 90CW lathe. 

My use case is the fabrication of bridges for existing movements that can be engraved / finished by myself. I would like to start with the cheaper Sincere lathe and accessories, and then upgrade the lathe to the 90CW while keeping all the Sincere accessories. 

Outside of the actual operation of the lathe, I am quite a novice in the intricacies of accessory threading. I would also like a recommendation (book, online resource, etc) on how to adequaltely assess the compatability between the accessories of two distinct lathes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest you contact both makers and put all your questions to them. Lathe accessories can be a minefield, you will find some you might even be able to adapt yourself. I suggest you shop around and don’t forget you might want to undertake different tasks as you improve. The more you learn the more you will want to do.  Accessories can be very expensive so you might need deep pockets. If you buy second hand be very careful.   

Edited by oldhippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oldhippy said:

I suggest you contact both makers and put all your questions to them. 

It's virtually impossible to contact the actual Chinese makers of Sincere lathes. And the re-sellers on Ebay may or may not posses the technical details. Always lots of misunderstandings when communicating with Chinese.

However it's know that the machine is perfectly good for both beginners and advance users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is the TIR of a typical Chinese spindle/collet combo vs a German, Swiss or American set up?  Anyone measured? 

Experience has conditioned me to expect much lower quality from the low cost Chinese tools and tooling, but I have not tried one of the lathes so a negative comment from me would just be extrapolation, although not devoid of rational...there are reasons for it.  I would be curious to know what something quantifiable like spindle TIR and the Max TIR over a set of collets actually is vs manufacturers claims and our prejudices.

OP, can't help on your question......the obvious idea is to check the manufactures specs for the spindle, but that might be easier said than done

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • jdm locked this topic
  • jdm unlocked this topic

Thanks jdm!

Hi Dralecmv

I myself own a Cowell's 90CW (just got it) and have done some research before my purchase.

A Cowell's 90CW has a spindle nose that fits 8mm. watchmaker types B8 (European Schaublin) and WW (American Webster Whitcombe), all this fit in Cowell's spindle. The difference is as you mention the thread.
B8 has a thread called 6.82mm x 0.625mm pitch with 55 degree threads.
WW collets have 0.275 "x 40TPI or 6.985mm x 0.635mm pitch.
The Chinese Sincere uses M7x0.75 on their accessories.

However, this is not a major problem. Sincerely can provide a universal drawbar that can be used for your Cowells when that day comes. Someone also feels great pleasure by producing some of their tools. Therefore you can easily find tap and die and make it yourself.

Cowells 90CW comes as standard with Drawbar for B8 collets. But as the machines are built to order it will be easy to get it delivered with just the drawbar you want. Even my goal is to make lots of drawbars so I can use what I want.

I can not recommend that you buy Sincere collets, as their runout is way too big for watchmaking!

"Dear Valued Customer, these collets run out is 0.02mm," :thumbsd: 

If you want to meet small run out for small money i think Sherline is the way ..(however, they are not hardened)

If you want to read more about this, Jere Mihalov has written everything about Cowell's 90CW and much about collets treads and other equipment.

https://watchmaking.weebly.com/other-lathe-attachments.html

 

 

 

sinceredrawbar.jpg

tapdie_sinceredrawbar.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making bridges is above my pay grade but if I was doing it, I’d probably want to use a boring head, rather than a lathe. 

Location and perpendicularly seem critical to me, as a novice. You can drill, team, and then tap without moving the location of the hole center. 

My experience with larger tapped holes I use the Bridgeport (knee mill) and lock the cross slide once I have my location. Spot drill, drill, tap without changing location. If it’s critical I’ll run my drill but in a collet rather than a chuck. I can also under-drill and ream it to size prior to tapping. This is also good for counter-boring where an endmill might be used for the counter and you end up with uniform space all around the screw head. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hopefully if the issue is running costs, Mark would let us know and suggest ways of raising finance. If it's the other issue, which we are skirting around, sites can be passed onto others.   PS because I know you're all interested, I  had a bacon and mushroom sandwich for breakfast.  Hehe. 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 
    • Hello Nosh and welcome to the forum.   Enjoy
    • Hi guys, the question is what is a forum, a place for discussion and passing on information, idle chat and a bit of fun and I for one are the richer for it. When in Hospital last year with the Covid being force fed oxygen and feeling total sh1t and close to the pearly gates a daily look on the forum to see what was going down helped to keep me focused on the job in hand took my mind off the problem for a short while but it was a lifeline for sure. We chat to friends for that is what they become around the world read their posts help where we can post information where we can.  I like @Neverenoughwatches some times think of members past and wonder if they are still at the watches or given up, some drop in for advise and drop out again never to be heard of again. The forum reminds me of Yorkshire hospitality, The door is always open and the kettle on the stove. Long may it continue.   My two bobs worth.
    • Thanks all.   Movement is a Helvetia 800C. Don't know any history e.g. if the broken mainspring is original. Watch was bought recently as non-working. Really interesting piece that Jon, thanks. I'd only been thinking of length relating to power reserve. I don't have a mainspring winder (yet) so I'd like to avoid winding the spring into the barrel by hand. The old spring measures at 1.60 x .11 x ~290. Sorry, can't be exact on the length. The piece I still have is 275, but the second piece escaped during measurement. Best measurement I had for it was ~13. The micrometer does zero accurately so I'm pretty confident of the .11 Also, I'm getting the barrel ID at 9.5 on a vernier. I'm now wondering about going with a .11 spring? Given all of the above, maybe 1.60 x .11 x 300 x 9? Any thoughts? Cheers.
×
×
  • Create New...