Jump to content

Is this mainspring ok?


omx5o

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I’m in the process of servicing an Oreba movement. After the disassemble and inspection, this is how I found the mainspring. It’s not S-shaped in any way and is not flat as you can see in the image. Is this mainspring tired and in need of replacement or should it be fine after a clean?

thanks.

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,
I’m in the process of servicing an Oreba movement. After the disassemble and inspection, this is how I found the mainspring. It’s not S-shaped in any way and is not flat as you can see in the image. Is this mainspring tired and in need of replacement or should it be fine after a clean?
thanks.

I’d replace it with a modern alloy spring. It’s old and the fact that it’s not lying flat would be enough for me to replace. It’s also likely that performance will be affected.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a mainspring that is "set" and would now allow for a long duration of powering the movement nor the movement's amplitude specification.  Not being flat is most likely due to the movement being installed by hand - not a mainspring winder.

Definitely replace.

George

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, that's a definitive replace then. I suppose the next question is how interchangeable are pocket watch mainsprings. Do I need to source the exact type for that caliber, or is it possible to use something more generic? The movement/watch is an Oreba and the main plate and bridges all have "84" stamped on them. The case has "3714" stamped on it. The barrel is 15mm diameter and the spring is about 1.5mm in height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone probably have an old pocket watch mainspring book.  I have checked but only had for watches. Could be tricky to find the exact spring. as new springs are much better then the old one where. show us a picture of the movement. If you have one. 

Found some Oreba movement on google. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&b0&2ustu&1386777618

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/OREBA-HALF-HUNTER-SWISS-LEVER-15J-MOVEMENT-SPARES-OR-REPAIRS-N27-/382293150576

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the problem I have every time I can’t find an exact match for a mainspring, you will need length height and thickness of the mainspring and then look for one that is nigh on the same, I cheekily ask here as some like old hippy to name but one will off the top of their head give you a size of a spring that will fit, it might be shorter but thicker etc etc but their experience is priceless, as of yet I still haven’t figured out how far off the exact measurements I can go to find a mainspring that would work. It’s wizardry you know!!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rodabod said:

A white spring of the same dimensions won’t have the same strength as a blue one, so this should be taken into account. 

SO does that mean that you will need a longer spring to compensate for the lack of strength or a thicker spring? ( I’m thinking thicker an I correct? ) and if so how much thicker or longer??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, transporter said:

SO does that mean that you will need a longer spring to compensate for the lack of strength or a thicker spring? ( I’m thinking thicker an I correct? ) and if so how much thicker or longer??

I understand that a coiled spring can be modeled as a series of small cantilever beams. The strength of such a beam is dependent on the moment of inertia = width*thickness³/12                     (that's thickness cubed)

i.e the strength of the spring is FAR more dependent on the thickness than the width.

So try to get the thickness as close as possible

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that's interesting math behind it. I now have the spring dimensions, 1.9 x 0.25 x 520 x 15.8 mm. My M.Cutmore book states that the unwound spring should occupy radius/3 of the barrel, so that's something else to keep in mind.

Cousins have a 1.9 x 0.23 x 500 x 16.5 Non-Automatic ( GR56991 ). That looks pretty close?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, omx5o said:

Thanks, that's interesting math behind it. I now have the spring dimensions, 1.9 x 0.25 x 520 x 15.8 mm. My M.Cutmore book states that the unwound spring should occupy radius/3 of the barrel, so that's something else to keep in mind.

Cousins have a 1.9 x 0.23 x 500 x 16.5 Non-Automatic ( GR56991 ). That looks pretty close?

Looks good but the diameter is too big to push straight in to the barrel. You will have to unwind it and re-wind it in to the barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Looks good but the diameter is too big to push straight in to the barrel. You will have to unwind it and re-wind it in to the barrel.

I measured the internal distance of the barrel. Is that correct? If I measure the external diameter (excluding the teeth) then it's 16.9mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an update. I received the new mainspring from Cousins today. Checked it against the barrel and as expected it was a fraction too big to just drop in. So I carefully unwound it by hand and used a winder to get it into the barrel. This is where it got a little interesting as I had problems the first time I used this winder because I used the wrong size so I selected what I thought should be correct size for this one. However, when winding I discovered that with about an inch of spring to go it suddenly jammed and I realized that the winder barrel was full and stopped the spring being completely housed. Fortunately I worked around the problem by continuing to insert the winder into the watch barrel as normal and then manually feeding in the inch of remaining spring into the gap around the edge of the barrel. I tried pressing the winder button but it was too stiff since the spring was jammed in, but fortunately with a little tap of a hammer the spring popped into place. So far so good.

Then I noticed that the spring's inside coil was just a little too big for the arbor which meant it just freely rotated without catching. So I carefully used pliers to shrink the size of the inner coil. The arbor then slotted firmly into place and after returning the barrel lid, it was winding successfully.

After that, I re-assembled and oiled the watch by closely following Mark's course videos. The movement is now happily ticking away with an amplitude of 274 and a nice steady beat. I think the balance might need realignment as there's a large gap between the dots on the timegrapher, but so far I'm pretty chuffed with it all.

Thanks for the help.

Peter

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...