Jump to content

Is this mainspring ok?


omx5o

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I’m in the process of servicing an Oreba movement. After the disassemble and inspection, this is how I found the mainspring. It’s not S-shaped in any way and is not flat as you can see in the image. Is this mainspring tired and in need of replacement or should it be fine after a clean?

thanks.

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,
I’m in the process of servicing an Oreba movement. After the disassemble and inspection, this is how I found the mainspring. It’s not S-shaped in any way and is not flat as you can see in the image. Is this mainspring tired and in need of replacement or should it be fine after a clean?
thanks.

I’d replace it with a modern alloy spring. It’s old and the fact that it’s not lying flat would be enough for me to replace. It’s also likely that performance will be affected.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a mainspring that is "set" and would now allow for a long duration of powering the movement nor the movement's amplitude specification.  Not being flat is most likely due to the movement being installed by hand - not a mainspring winder.

Definitely replace.

George

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, that's a definitive replace then. I suppose the next question is how interchangeable are pocket watch mainsprings. Do I need to source the exact type for that caliber, or is it possible to use something more generic? The movement/watch is an Oreba and the main plate and bridges all have "84" stamped on them. The case has "3714" stamped on it. The barrel is 15mm diameter and the spring is about 1.5mm in height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone probably have an old pocket watch mainspring book.  I have checked but only had for watches. Could be tricky to find the exact spring. as new springs are much better then the old one where. show us a picture of the movement. If you have one. 

Found some Oreba movement on google. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&b0&2ustu&1386777618

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/OREBA-HALF-HUNTER-SWISS-LEVER-15J-MOVEMENT-SPARES-OR-REPAIRS-N27-/382293150576

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the problem I have every time I can’t find an exact match for a mainspring, you will need length height and thickness of the mainspring and then look for one that is nigh on the same, I cheekily ask here as some like old hippy to name but one will off the top of their head give you a size of a spring that will fit, it might be shorter but thicker etc etc but their experience is priceless, as of yet I still haven’t figured out how far off the exact measurements I can go to find a mainspring that would work. It’s wizardry you know!!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rodabod said:

A white spring of the same dimensions won’t have the same strength as a blue one, so this should be taken into account. 

SO does that mean that you will need a longer spring to compensate for the lack of strength or a thicker spring? ( I’m thinking thicker an I correct? ) and if so how much thicker or longer??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, transporter said:

SO does that mean that you will need a longer spring to compensate for the lack of strength or a thicker spring? ( I’m thinking thicker an I correct? ) and if so how much thicker or longer??

I understand that a coiled spring can be modeled as a series of small cantilever beams. The strength of such a beam is dependent on the moment of inertia = width*thickness³/12                     (that's thickness cubed)

i.e the strength of the spring is FAR more dependent on the thickness than the width.

So try to get the thickness as close as possible

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that's interesting math behind it. I now have the spring dimensions, 1.9 x 0.25 x 520 x 15.8 mm. My M.Cutmore book states that the unwound spring should occupy radius/3 of the barrel, so that's something else to keep in mind.

Cousins have a 1.9 x 0.23 x 500 x 16.5 Non-Automatic ( GR56991 ). That looks pretty close?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, omx5o said:

Thanks, that's interesting math behind it. I now have the spring dimensions, 1.9 x 0.25 x 520 x 15.8 mm. My M.Cutmore book states that the unwound spring should occupy radius/3 of the barrel, so that's something else to keep in mind.

Cousins have a 1.9 x 0.23 x 500 x 16.5 Non-Automatic ( GR56991 ). That looks pretty close?

Looks good but the diameter is too big to push straight in to the barrel. You will have to unwind it and re-wind it in to the barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Looks good but the diameter is too big to push straight in to the barrel. You will have to unwind it and re-wind it in to the barrel.

I measured the internal distance of the barrel. Is that correct? If I measure the external diameter (excluding the teeth) then it's 16.9mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an update. I received the new mainspring from Cousins today. Checked it against the barrel and as expected it was a fraction too big to just drop in. So I carefully unwound it by hand and used a winder to get it into the barrel. This is where it got a little interesting as I had problems the first time I used this winder because I used the wrong size so I selected what I thought should be correct size for this one. However, when winding I discovered that with about an inch of spring to go it suddenly jammed and I realized that the winder barrel was full and stopped the spring being completely housed. Fortunately I worked around the problem by continuing to insert the winder into the watch barrel as normal and then manually feeding in the inch of remaining spring into the gap around the edge of the barrel. I tried pressing the winder button but it was too stiff since the spring was jammed in, but fortunately with a little tap of a hammer the spring popped into place. So far so good.

Then I noticed that the spring's inside coil was just a little too big for the arbor which meant it just freely rotated without catching. So I carefully used pliers to shrink the size of the inner coil. The arbor then slotted firmly into place and after returning the barrel lid, it was winding successfully.

After that, I re-assembled and oiled the watch by closely following Mark's course videos. The movement is now happily ticking away with an amplitude of 274 and a nice steady beat. I think the balance might need realignment as there's a large gap between the dots on the timegrapher, but so far I'm pretty chuffed with it all.

Thanks for the help.

Peter

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...