Jump to content

Seiko 6106-8489 - broken autowind lever


Gryf

Recommended Posts

Hi, all.

While I've been following Mark's videos for a long time, I've started servicing some of my watch collection only recently. A couple of days back I tied into a Seiko that I bought new in 1973, calibre number 6106-8489. The servicing went rather well, except for one newbie mistake - see below. I managed to find why the watch was non-functional; one leg of the auto-wind lever was broken off. See pictures below. I'm posting in hopes that one of you with more experience can steer me toward a source for this part.

Also, being a novice - and not yet owning a mainspring winder - I managed to break the spring trying to feed it back into the barrel. Do I need to look for an actual Seiko spring, or should I measure the broken one and order a generic one accordingly?

Thanks! I really appreciate any assistance.

Gryf

autowind.jpg.3f3e6b64e535890a02e92c50d9565ef4.jpg

autowind_levers.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainsprings exist in many dimensions (and not just that) so normally you should find one for this type of movement. Others might fit but I guess that requires further experience and, perhaps, plenty of spares to try out.

I'd say the broken part might be similar to that of other movements but not sure and you'd have to find some parts interchangeability list.

If the mainspring is good this should help you complete your repair. Provided that you want to spend the money. Can also check out his website where he might have more parts...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Seiko-6106-8060-watch-for-parts-restore-Serial-nr-811043/132359796113?hash=item1ed1423591:g:pSoAAOSwW9RaaYvF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, which version  of the movement do  you have? It was available as an  A,  B with 17  jewels,  B with 25 jewels,  and a C  version.

Here's a link to Jules Borel's parts list for  the  B version 

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=SEK_6106B-17JL,

Here's  what they show for a replacement spring - 

 MAINSPRING, 1.05 X .115 X 420     GR 2534-X 

of which the first part is the dimension of the spring,  and the second is the General Ressorts part number. 

If  you click on the entry, it shows a part number of 0401615 (Seiko  Number), which Borel has in stock for $28.00

The pawl lever with jewel is 0831611 (Seiko Number), and Borel doesn't seem to  have it. 

I've also attached the  Seiko 6106A tech sheet so you can  find part numbers.

6106A.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the update sheet  for the various  "C" versions.  It  shows the parts that are  different  from  the "A". It looks like the pawl  with  jewel didn't  change. This part  is common to a  lot of  movements, so you  should be able to find  a scrap movement to scavenge  without much  problem.

 6106C.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Dadistic! I found that same data sheet myself yesterday, so we're on the right track. I also found some suitable parts watches on eBay, but I won't be able to get back to it until next week.

Cheers,

Gryf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Following up - we're all set with a new autowind module, thanks to an eBay vendor parting out a 6106C. Now for a new mainspring... I was out of town for several days and project Seiko lost momentum. I hope to get it wrapped up shortly, and wear my college watch again! ;-)

thanks again,

Gryf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi. Yes I get it , the slot in the end I’d to allow you to screw the button on whilst holding the pusher shaft. To remove the pusher tube you will need a tool such as the one shown by Richard. I think Ali Express the Chinese Amazon has replicas of the Horotec system for a lot less money, how effective they are not having had to use one. But as you said the way to go is complete removal and replacement, bodging it up will  lead to a repeat failure
    • It does look like it seems to be working again I'm getting emails.
    • One of the things that I've been bothered with lately is timekeeping? For instance a 90-year-old pocket watch what so to timekeeping was it supposed to keep? They publish railroad timekeeping but I don't know how well normal non-railroad watches were supposed to keep time. The reason why the question comes up for me is I spend a lot of time at work adjusting watches to keep really really good time  because I have to please my boss where as when the watch was made I have to wonder what kind timekeeping would've been acceptable. After all they typically didn't have timing machines 100 years ago and they were timing and six positions certainly not for the non-railroad grade watch. On the other hand I do get paid by the hour so maybe I shouldn't be concerned of how much time I Spend trying to make everything keep chronometer timekeeping almost. Citing a Delta of 40 seconds for a 90-year-old watch is quite outstanding.
    • That's an interesting question which I don't think I've seen explained anywhere. But I think the problem will go away just about instantaneously. In other words the  coating is really thin and it should go away almost immediately. So the problem should resolve itself extremely fast.  
    • I experienced that different types of shellac and their ages are affected differently by IPA. Sometimes the shellac dissolves in a few seconds and sometimes several minutes are required. Nowadays I never let shellac come into contact with IPA. It's a hotly debated topic here on WRT if you search. Like John, I don't think you need to worry about the weight of the shellac, but instead that it might start rubbing against something. When I learned how to adjust pallet stones, I tried documenting my experiences in this thread. Hopefully, it can help you. I personally don't believe in the idea of abrading the epilame before oiling so I don't think you need to think or worry about it. The only time I've heard anyone mention this is Alex on the YouTube channel Watch Repair Tutorials but actually no one else. I'm not saying it's "wrong" just that I don't think it's necessary or adds anything.
×
×
  • Create New...