Jump to content

Seiko 6106-8489 - broken autowind lever


Gryf

Recommended Posts

Hi, all.

While I've been following Mark's videos for a long time, I've started servicing some of my watch collection only recently. A couple of days back I tied into a Seiko that I bought new in 1973, calibre number 6106-8489. The servicing went rather well, except for one newbie mistake - see below. I managed to find why the watch was non-functional; one leg of the auto-wind lever was broken off. See pictures below. I'm posting in hopes that one of you with more experience can steer me toward a source for this part.

Also, being a novice - and not yet owning a mainspring winder - I managed to break the spring trying to feed it back into the barrel. Do I need to look for an actual Seiko spring, or should I measure the broken one and order a generic one accordingly?

Thanks! I really appreciate any assistance.

Gryf

autowind.jpg.3f3e6b64e535890a02e92c50d9565ef4.jpg

autowind_levers.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainsprings exist in many dimensions (and not just that) so normally you should find one for this type of movement. Others might fit but I guess that requires further experience and, perhaps, plenty of spares to try out.

I'd say the broken part might be similar to that of other movements but not sure and you'd have to find some parts interchangeability list.

If the mainspring is good this should help you complete your repair. Provided that you want to spend the money. Can also check out his website where he might have more parts...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Seiko-6106-8060-watch-for-parts-restore-Serial-nr-811043/132359796113?hash=item1ed1423591:g:pSoAAOSwW9RaaYvF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, which version  of the movement do  you have? It was available as an  A,  B with 17  jewels,  B with 25 jewels,  and a C  version.

Here's a link to Jules Borel's parts list for  the  B version 

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=SEK_6106B-17JL,

Here's  what they show for a replacement spring - 

 MAINSPRING, 1.05 X .115 X 420     GR 2534-X 

of which the first part is the dimension of the spring,  and the second is the General Ressorts part number. 

If  you click on the entry, it shows a part number of 0401615 (Seiko  Number), which Borel has in stock for $28.00

The pawl lever with jewel is 0831611 (Seiko Number), and Borel doesn't seem to  have it. 

I've also attached the  Seiko 6106A tech sheet so you can  find part numbers.

6106A.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the update sheet  for the various  "C" versions.  It  shows the parts that are  different  from  the "A". It looks like the pawl  with  jewel didn't  change. This part  is common to a  lot of  movements, so you  should be able to find  a scrap movement to scavenge  without much  problem.

 6106C.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Dadistic! I found that same data sheet myself yesterday, so we're on the right track. I also found some suitable parts watches on eBay, but I won't be able to get back to it until next week.

Cheers,

Gryf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Following up - we're all set with a new autowind module, thanks to an eBay vendor parting out a 6106C. Now for a new mainspring... I was out of town for several days and project Seiko lost momentum. I hope to get it wrapped up shortly, and wear my college watch again! ;-)

thanks again,

Gryf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...