Jump to content

Seiko 6106-8489 - broken autowind lever


Gryf

Recommended Posts

Hi, all.

While I've been following Mark's videos for a long time, I've started servicing some of my watch collection only recently. A couple of days back I tied into a Seiko that I bought new in 1973, calibre number 6106-8489. The servicing went rather well, except for one newbie mistake - see below. I managed to find why the watch was non-functional; one leg of the auto-wind lever was broken off. See pictures below. I'm posting in hopes that one of you with more experience can steer me toward a source for this part.

Also, being a novice - and not yet owning a mainspring winder - I managed to break the spring trying to feed it back into the barrel. Do I need to look for an actual Seiko spring, or should I measure the broken one and order a generic one accordingly?

Thanks! I really appreciate any assistance.

Gryf

autowind.jpg.3f3e6b64e535890a02e92c50d9565ef4.jpg

autowind_levers.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainsprings exist in many dimensions (and not just that) so normally you should find one for this type of movement. Others might fit but I guess that requires further experience and, perhaps, plenty of spares to try out.

I'd say the broken part might be similar to that of other movements but not sure and you'd have to find some parts interchangeability list.

If the mainspring is good this should help you complete your repair. Provided that you want to spend the money. Can also check out his website where he might have more parts...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Seiko-6106-8060-watch-for-parts-restore-Serial-nr-811043/132359796113?hash=item1ed1423591:g:pSoAAOSwW9RaaYvF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, which version  of the movement do  you have? It was available as an  A,  B with 17  jewels,  B with 25 jewels,  and a C  version.

Here's a link to Jules Borel's parts list for  the  B version 

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=SEK_6106B-17JL,

Here's  what they show for a replacement spring - 

 MAINSPRING, 1.05 X .115 X 420     GR 2534-X 

of which the first part is the dimension of the spring,  and the second is the General Ressorts part number. 

If  you click on the entry, it shows a part number of 0401615 (Seiko  Number), which Borel has in stock for $28.00

The pawl lever with jewel is 0831611 (Seiko Number), and Borel doesn't seem to  have it. 

I've also attached the  Seiko 6106A tech sheet so you can  find part numbers.

6106A.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the update sheet  for the various  "C" versions.  It  shows the parts that are  different  from  the "A". It looks like the pawl  with  jewel didn't  change. This part  is common to a  lot of  movements, so you  should be able to find  a scrap movement to scavenge  without much  problem.

 6106C.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Dadistic! I found that same data sheet myself yesterday, so we're on the right track. I also found some suitable parts watches on eBay, but I won't be able to get back to it until next week.

Cheers,

Gryf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Following up - we're all set with a new autowind module, thanks to an eBay vendor parting out a 6106C. Now for a new mainspring... I was out of town for several days and project Seiko lost momentum. I hope to get it wrapped up shortly, and wear my college watch again! ;-)

thanks again,

Gryf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
×
×
  • Create New...