Jump to content

What am I? Ingersoll or Trenton or ?


Recommended Posts

I have this watch - It's my first whole watch success (in that it's working and I've actually made it better ;) ). Only problem is one of identification.

It's marked as an "Ingersoll-Trenton". I can find Ingersoll and Trenton and I know Trenton was purchased by Ingersoll in 1908.

So my watch has serial number 3372817 - which is it? An Ingersoll, a Trenton or something else?

 

ingersol_serial.JPG

P3250001.JPG

P3250009.JPG

P3250010.JPG

Trenton_serial.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, khunter said:

after the purchase of Trenton,

So that puts the watch post 1908 but the Ingersoll serial lookup suggests 1905 at the latest.

Which serial number list should I use? Do you have any other suggestions on trying to date this watch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here is what I found on the net:

The Trenton Watch Company was a successor to the New Haven Watch Company, which had been started in 1883 in New Haven, Connecticut, but had undergone financial reorganization in 1887.

Trenton produced nearly two million watches, most of which were lower to mid-grade pieces in the 7-9-11 jewel range. Most of the watches produced were intended for the domestic market, but factory records indicate that some watches were produced for export to England around the turn of the century. Trenton was subsequently sold to Ingersoll in 1908.

Trenton-produced watches were marketed under a variety of brand names, including: Trenton, Ingersoll Trenton, Fortuna, Calumet USA, Advance Watch Co, Marvel Watch Co, Reliance Watch Co, Locomotive Special and Engineers Special. Both the Engineers Special and Locomotive Special were marked as 23-jewel watches, even though they had only 7 functional jewels... the others were fake and were entirely for appearance! Similarly, the watches sold under the Marvel Watch Co. brand-name were marked 23-jewels, even though all but 7 jewels were non-functional. Some of these "fake jewel" watches can be quite collectible today.

Trenton also produced two 18-size fly-back chronograph models, both with 9 jewels. Based on a Grade 40 or 41 with chronograph modifications, the watches were produced in limited quantity, and these watches are considered to be quite rare and collectible today.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In one of the other discussions of this watch you had a link to your Google drive with photographs. What makes the photographs interesting is the case? So I have a link to an article about the case making company. Then the case has marks on it like a British case or in this case a Birmingham case. Then one of the letters is a date code Which dates it is 1908 or 1909.

 

http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogdennison.php

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This imagecaseStamps.thumb.JPG.7e5838e964c06f717d94f312361e4da4.JPG

So that hallmark is Birmingham 1908

https://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Dates/Birmingham/Cycle 1900-1924.html

 

hallmark.JPG.d4d1d2acd7448242d7eb93bec7f25b19.JPG

And the makers stamp is as you say Dennison

http://www.silvercollection.it/ENGLISHSILVERMARKSXA3.html#862ING

 

So - would it be reasonable to suggest this watch was made on or around the year that Ingersoll bought Trenton - i.e. 1908?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, p2n said:

So - would it be reasonable to suggest this watch was made on or around the year that Ingersoll bought Trenton - i.e. 1908?

Unfortunately it's not quite that simple as vinn3 As pointed out above. I don't know enough about the watch company in question but a lot of the watch companies sold their movements separate. You'd go to a jewelry store the movements would be in one case the cases would be another case. They did not come together. Not to say that they couldn't come together because often times the watch companies did case their watches up. Then through time watches get swapped in their cases. A lot of times you can tell that if you look where the screws go for holding it in the case they'll be additional marks where others screws were.

So what we do get is we know when the case was made. If you can find data that the company purchased their cases from Denison then all of this becomes much much more important. But even though it does give you some dates the case seems about the right time for the watch it's just another clue or breadcrumb to follow on your trail to.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Unfortunately it's not quite that simple as vinn3 As pointed out above. I don't know enough about the watch company in question but a lot of the watch companies sold their movements separate. You'd go to a jewelry store the movements would be in one case the cases would be another case. They did not come together. Not to say that they couldn't come together because often times the watch companies did case their watches up. Then through time watches get swapped in their cases. A lot of times you can tell that if you look where the screws go for holding it in the case they'll be additional marks where others screws were.

So what we do get is we know when the case was made. If you can find data that the company purchased their cases from Denison then all of this becomes much much more important. But even though it does give you some dates the case seems about the right time for the watch it's just another clue or breadcrumb to follow on your trail to.

  it's not simple.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thinking goes along these lines:

  1. The name - Ingersoll-Trenton. This must be after the purchase of Trenton by Ingersoll in 1908
  2. The Serial number. I get a range from 1885 to 1908
  3. The case - manufactured in 1908

So the purchase says it can't be before 1908 or it would not have the combined name.

The Serial number says it can't be much after 1908

The case was made in 1908

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

  another twist to the pocket watch story;  a man like my granfather might have a solid gold elgin with 14 jewels.  1929 in the U S A , there started "the great depresion".  off to the jeweler he would go to have the very good movement transfered to a "nickel silver case". vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @JohnR725 that's very helpful.  I appreciate the time you took to give those instructions and post the pictures.  below is a picture of my staff, which looks identical to the ones you posted.  The approx measurements I got are: .772 on the left part of the staff; .715 on the right side of the hub; the hub is 1.107; and the overall length (minus the broken pivot) is 5.248; which seem to line up with the measurements you posted.  I didn't think to measure the pivot, which I'll do if there's enough of one left on the staff.  Thanks again.
    • Thank you to both of you!  I've been somewhat derailed by this quandary for a couple of days now. I am guessing that the point of the wider tweezers is to support the whole spring at the same time in an effort to prevent it going under tension... I have already discovered the Zen of a clutter free space, and trying to keep my work well away from the edge, however the most terrifying of the flights wasn't so short, I had my work in the middle of the table and nothing else around.  That particular launch was towards me.  I distinctly recall feeling the spring hit my left hand as it escaped.  I only found it by dumb luck, on the floor, between the legs of my chair.  I need to order a pack of replacements just in case.  I think I recall a thread discussing where to find them, and the differences between the clones and the authentic ETA ones, pointing out that they're not interchangeable (the clones being longer IIRC).  Now I just have to find that thread again.  What I haven't mastered is the zen of the search function here.  I'm sure I"ll get that down eventually. So this is similar to, but different from one of the posts I had found in my original searches (or maybe I'm just hallucinating, I can't find the post I thought I remember).  The bits about the corner filled in a gap in what I'd read before.  At least I have a more clear picture in my head about what needs to happen now.  Yes, I've learned about how touchy these springs are.  What I'm not sure I have a good grasp on is the understanding of what causes the spring to flex, other than to say "the slightest little touch"  I think I'm going to try a small bit of Rodico to position the spring next time.
    • I think it's stamped on the inside cover. 309 I think.
    • Hi all, needing a little help. I have an old Casio AQ-321G, but have no idea what battery it takes. I've looked around online, but cannot see anything... I see a 309 stamped on the case back, could this be it....? Can you please help, below are some pictures:
    • The radial teeth are for hte seconds register, and the other (which is simple and doesn' take away significant torque from the train) for the minutes register.
×
×
  • Create New...