Jump to content

Vintage Omega Geneve Seconds Hand Issue


AdamC

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I have been asked to fix a problem with the stem of an Omega Geneve that wasn't engaging to set the hands and wind. Fair enough, I'm becoming a little more experienced now after six months of tinkering and soon identified that the winding pinion had popped out of its housing and fouling the calendar wheel teeth - presumably someone else had removed the stem before! Anyhow, fiddly but I fixed the problem, reassembled, and everything tested out okay (winds, hands set, and calendar quick set works).

The problem now is that when I fit the second hand it keeps falling off, though while laid flat face up, the second hand moves around the dial normally. I've added a couple of photos, just in case you can spot anything. I must add that I ordered a set of used replacement hands, thinking that the second hand hole (if that's the term) had become worn and too large for the pinion. However, the replacement hand makes no difference. So am I now correct in looking towards pinion wear that's driving the second hand through the cannon pinion? Am I doing anything obviously wrong that you may be able to provide a tip for. I am using a proper Horotec hand fitting tool in an attempt to press the hand fully home, though afraid to exert much force in case I damage anything.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Adam

20180327_180459647_iOS.jpg

20180327_180440545_iOS.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is likely that the second hand shaft is pushing down so the hand is not fully going onto it.  The second hand pinion is held in mesh by a flat spring which sits on the other end of the shaft.  This needs to be supported when fitting the second hand so that it allows the hand to be fitted without moving down.  This spring can be seen when the rotor bridge is removed, see near the centre of the pic attached.

Cal552.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, canthus said:

It is likely that the second hand shaft is pushing down so the hand is not fully going onto it.  The second hand pinion is held in mesh by a flat spring which sits on the other end of the shaft.  This needs to be supported when fitting the second hand so that it allows the hand to be fitted without moving down.  This spring can be seen when the rotor bridge is removed, see near the centre of the pic attached.

Cal552.JPG

I would say that is the issue the pinion needs to  be supported when fitting the centre seconds hand much the same as some chronographs (thinking of the ETA 7750) that really need a dedicated movement holder to support the centre pinion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. I have taken the rotor off and the drive wheel and now have what's shown in the photo. So rather than just dive in, when you say rotor bridge, I'm assuming I now need to bite the bullet and remove the two screws holding it on. It just looks quite different to your photo (accepting that it's a different movement). Presumably I'm going to have to remove a number of wheels underneath looking at those pivots?! Apologies for probably ask ing the obvious :) 

20180327_203338509a_iOS.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit the bullet and removed the rotor bridge. I think I can see the flat spring hiding further down underneath that centre pinion. I've circled it in red. Just in case anybody's got a pointer to watch out for, I'll leave this one till tomorrow now. 

20180327_220407017a_iOS.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could be wrong, but the movement you posted may be a “directly driven” seconds type, as opposed to the indirectly driven types posted beforehand from a 500-series. 

For the 500-series, you can get away with fitting the seconds hand once the rotor is assembled as it supports the friction spring. Another alternative is to use a firm case cushion. 

Edited by rodabod
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...