Jump to content

Nonsensical problem reported? Or am I dumb?


azkid

Recommended Posts

Is it just me or does the following not quite make sense? This is a problem reported by an eBay buyer of a 1937 grade 345, 12S, 17J Elgin movement I sold recently:

 

...the winding arbor where you set the time and wind the pocket-watch movement is stripped out badly. Now, since I do not have a mainspring winder it would be impossible for me to remove the mainspring barrel assembly to access and replace the defective part.

 

I just wanted to check my newb understanding with the gurus here.

 

My assumption is something is wrong with the barrel arbor or spring. But to me the statement does not make sense, altogether.

 

I ran the movement overnight, recorded timing traces in 6 positions for a few minutes each, and provided approximate results in the listing -- rather than the typical and ambiguous "keeps time" and/or "runs".

 

I was hoping to go to a little extra effort to reduce risk for the buyer. So much for that idea.

 

Once I get the movement back I will post up the autopsy results.

 

Maybe I can fix whatever is wrong and track down a stem and case for it eventually.

 

(Auction link for reference: https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F332575152043)4201154938d869de9b87ca5eb55d2ff4.jpge412280f25af417580d6bde2d3fd29cb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the buyer probably isn't aware this uses a specific stem, and he's trying to use a normal case/stem setup. Since he can't put any pressure on the winding mechanism (winding clutch), he can't let the power down to disassemble, although if it was running he could just let it "run down"....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised he can't just use a common sized bench key to let down the mainspring. I've worked on a few 12 Elgins and have never had a problem. Now if the clutch-wheel is stripped internally, unlikely, maybe he'd have an issue. Maybe he's referring to a bench-key as a mainspring winder. I mean, if he can't get let down the mainspring in order to take down the watch, I don't know what a mainspring winder is going to get him. It is confusing indeed. I'd be interested to hear about the condition of the inside of the clutch. Good luck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, azkid said:

Maybe that's what's going on.

I did mention in the listing about the more modern stem being required but that's ok guarantee he saw that sentence (I miss things all the time).

Was this watch a watch you sold on eBay. If so did you sell it as a working watch or was it sold as parts & repair. If it was sold as a working watch I would be very worried about the buyer attempting repairs because you just don't know what he/she as broken in attempting the repair. I wonder why if it was not working why you was not contacted at that point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that maybe the mainspring was slipping?? It’s a confusing statement and I’m pretty sure they’re mixing up at least one or more of their terms.
Or, they’re just trying to scam you.....and there’s nothing wrong. Or user error.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
    • Before putting it back in the case I would fit the hands and use a pin vice on the stem to make sure the hands were in line. 
×
×
  • Create New...