Jump to content

A Nice 9Ct Gold Longines From 1964


WillFly

Recommended Posts

I'm slowly adding to my collection of gold watches. (thinks... am I getting blingier as I get older...?) and made an offer on a nice, simple Longines this morning. Which was accepted. I do like Longines movements, which are generally beautifully engineered. It's in a Baumes-made 9ct gold case, hallmarked for London, 1964. The pic of the movement's a little lacking in contrasts - I'll post some better ones when it comes. Also a few marks on the sub-seconds dial, but I'm not particularly worried - I like to keep watches as they are, if possible, with all their history.

 

post-64-0-02781200-1411207271_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-34081800-1411207421_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-16968300-1411207269_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-68525300-1411207267_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-60588400-1411207265_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's potentially a really nice watch. Do you intend having the dial refinished?

It's a possibility. I'll look at it in the flesh when it gets here and see what it's like in general. I'd prefer the dial to remain as original as possible, but - if need be - I'll get D.R. Bill to do it up, which will be in the region of £70 or so. (He's just quoted me £83 for a chrono dial refinish, and the chrono is far tattier than the Longines).

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a very nice top quality watch Will,  a few pounds spent on the dial and it will look like new.  It would be interesting to know how many ticks it's ticked since 1964,  got to be in the millions.

 

Just out of interest but if you want the dial restored do you have to remove it yourself or just post them the watch and they remove it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch arrived this morning, in good nick and starting up on the first wind. I'll time it over the next 24 hours and see how it goes. The casing is in excellent condition, as is the movement, which is a Cal. 19.4. Interestingly, the watch movement dimension, according to Ranfft, is 8.75 lignes - which is 19.4mm. So - did Longines allocate calibre numbers by the dimensions of the movement? A quick check on other Longines movements in Ranfft tells me: No! Probably pure coincidence.

 

Anyway, some pics of mine. Looking at the dial in the flesh leads me to the conclusion that, at some stage, I will get the dial cleaned up.

 

post-64-0-98656600-1411375044_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-14318100-1411375049_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-03215900-1411375037_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-90382700-1411375040_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better that the first pictures! It is a very, very nice watch...at the risk of repeating myself! Congratulations Will on an excellent new jewel for your collection!

 

As a side note, did you know that Longines was the only other watch that flew to the moon with the Omegas and actually helped the crew? There is a story behind that I have to look up, something about failing computers and emergency landings similar to the Omega story. The watch in question was not officially sanctioned by NASA but one of the crew took it with him and actually was indispensable at the time, performing flawlessly under those conditions.

Edited by bobm12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better that the first pictures! It is a very, very nice watch...at the risk of repeating myself! Congratulations Will on an excellent new jewel for your collection!

 

As a side note, did you know that Longines was the only other watch that flew to the moon with the Omegas and actually helped the crew? There is a story behind that I have to look up, something about failing computers and emergency landings similar to the Omega story. The watch in question was not officially sanctioned by NASA but one of the crew took it with him and actually was indispensable at the time, performing flawlessly under those conditions.

No - I'd never heard that story - I'd love to know more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read it once on line, and it looked legit. Now all I can find is how great Omega is and a long "course" on Swiss quality by Swatch! Weird because it was only this one incident I read about...not talking about the Rolex GMT Master that landed the Apollo-whatever-number nor the Bulova Accutrons and stopwatches officially adopted for timing tasks by NASA but something related to a module landing on the sea somewhere: small but important. The astronaut carried it just for testing or out of habit and it came through instead of the intended equipment.

 

Now, there is also a Whittnauer that filled in for an Omega when the later popped its crystal due to the pressure... and found references of other brands at different times, including the Seiko 6139 on the Skylab but complete silence for Longines which doesn't seem right. Information suppressed? Don't get me wrong, I love Omegas but fair is fair.

 

In any case, Longines have a long history in sporting events and other significant activities and was considered for testing by NASA for space flights. There were a reduced few for this testing. According to the web, only Omegas passed but that doesn't retract in quality and/or prestige as we all know. I believe most movements for space purpose were -- or similar to - the Valjoux 7734.

Edited by bobm12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello everybody, sorry for the late reply. Thank you all so much for your help and your tips. I got lucky and found a replacement wheel bridge for cheap which actually ended up being in decent condition. I decided not to do anything about the mainspring barrel pivot since I didn't have the right tools and the barrel didn't have much endshake anyhow. I am happy to report that the watch now runs great, I have regulated it to about +-10/s day which is fine by my standards. The timegrapher result looks decent as well, although beat error is around 0.6ms which could be better I suppose. Amplitude reaches over 230 quite consistently which I'm happy with also. My lighter fluid has also been replaced by balance spring cleaning solution and now the springs don't stick to themselves anymore - who would have thought. I'm super happy with this watch, it might not be worth a whole lot but it's awesome that I could restore it and it makes me wear it with pride. To me it's a genuinely good lucking watch, it'll be my daily driver for a while. Thanks again to everybody for their input! I couldn't have done the repair without your help.   Here are some images for those interested, the bracelet isn't original but I don't really mind:    
    • Balance-hairspring system is oscillator with big Q-factor. When all in the movement is OK, the rate (frequency) is verry close to the own resonant frequency of the balance-hairspring. But in some cases, the movement (with foult) will force the resonator to work on pritty different frequency, sometimes faster, and sometimes slower. When this happens, the amplitude is always weak. So, the first thing to ask is what is the amplitude. If it is more than 180 and the hairspring doesn't touch itself and anything else, then for sure it is 'short'. If the amplitude is weak, then the first thing to do is to understand why and rectify the problem. At this time no point to check timekeeping. But, if one doubts that the hairspring is not correct, then He needs to calcullate the rate of the movement, then to 'vibrate' the balance-hairspring out of the movement and to measure the free oscillations frequency (period) with timer in order to ensure that they comply with the rate. If we have pictures, then it will be easier to tell something about that wheel.
    • So much work has gone into this! Thanks again @Jon. I will go back and check my adjustments from last weekend. A few questions for you, if you don't mind. In the reset position, I can understand the problem if the gap between the hammer and the minute counter heart is too big (slide 77) but what is bad about both hammers being in contact with the cams (slide 76)? I read somewhere that Landeron recommended grease on the runner cam, but the minute counter heart should be dry. Is that so, and why? How many tads in a ligne?
    • Could you glue two pieces together for rigidity and separate after forming? 
×
×
  • Create New...