Jump to content

A Nice 9Ct Gold Longines From 1964


WillFly

Recommended Posts

I'm slowly adding to my collection of gold watches. (thinks... am I getting blingier as I get older...?) and made an offer on a nice, simple Longines this morning. Which was accepted. I do like Longines movements, which are generally beautifully engineered. It's in a Baumes-made 9ct gold case, hallmarked for London, 1964. The pic of the movement's a little lacking in contrasts - I'll post some better ones when it comes. Also a few marks on the sub-seconds dial, but I'm not particularly worried - I like to keep watches as they are, if possible, with all their history.

 

post-64-0-02781200-1411207271_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-34081800-1411207421_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-16968300-1411207269_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-68525300-1411207267_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-60588400-1411207265_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's potentially a really nice watch. Do you intend having the dial refinished?

It's a possibility. I'll look at it in the flesh when it gets here and see what it's like in general. I'd prefer the dial to remain as original as possible, but - if need be - I'll get D.R. Bill to do it up, which will be in the region of £70 or so. (He's just quoted me £83 for a chrono dial refinish, and the chrono is far tattier than the Longines).

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a very nice top quality watch Will,  a few pounds spent on the dial and it will look like new.  It would be interesting to know how many ticks it's ticked since 1964,  got to be in the millions.

 

Just out of interest but if you want the dial restored do you have to remove it yourself or just post them the watch and they remove it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch arrived this morning, in good nick and starting up on the first wind. I'll time it over the next 24 hours and see how it goes. The casing is in excellent condition, as is the movement, which is a Cal. 19.4. Interestingly, the watch movement dimension, according to Ranfft, is 8.75 lignes - which is 19.4mm. So - did Longines allocate calibre numbers by the dimensions of the movement? A quick check on other Longines movements in Ranfft tells me: No! Probably pure coincidence.

 

Anyway, some pics of mine. Looking at the dial in the flesh leads me to the conclusion that, at some stage, I will get the dial cleaned up.

 

post-64-0-98656600-1411375044_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-14318100-1411375049_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-03215900-1411375037_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-90382700-1411375040_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better that the first pictures! It is a very, very nice watch...at the risk of repeating myself! Congratulations Will on an excellent new jewel for your collection!

 

As a side note, did you know that Longines was the only other watch that flew to the moon with the Omegas and actually helped the crew? There is a story behind that I have to look up, something about failing computers and emergency landings similar to the Omega story. The watch in question was not officially sanctioned by NASA but one of the crew took it with him and actually was indispensable at the time, performing flawlessly under those conditions.

Edited by bobm12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better that the first pictures! It is a very, very nice watch...at the risk of repeating myself! Congratulations Will on an excellent new jewel for your collection!

 

As a side note, did you know that Longines was the only other watch that flew to the moon with the Omegas and actually helped the crew? There is a story behind that I have to look up, something about failing computers and emergency landings similar to the Omega story. The watch in question was not officially sanctioned by NASA but one of the crew took it with him and actually was indispensable at the time, performing flawlessly under those conditions.

No - I'd never heard that story - I'd love to know more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read it once on line, and it looked legit. Now all I can find is how great Omega is and a long "course" on Swiss quality by Swatch! Weird because it was only this one incident I read about...not talking about the Rolex GMT Master that landed the Apollo-whatever-number nor the Bulova Accutrons and stopwatches officially adopted for timing tasks by NASA but something related to a module landing on the sea somewhere: small but important. The astronaut carried it just for testing or out of habit and it came through instead of the intended equipment.

 

Now, there is also a Whittnauer that filled in for an Omega when the later popped its crystal due to the pressure... and found references of other brands at different times, including the Seiko 6139 on the Skylab but complete silence for Longines which doesn't seem right. Information suppressed? Don't get me wrong, I love Omegas but fair is fair.

 

In any case, Longines have a long history in sporting events and other significant activities and was considered for testing by NASA for space flights. There were a reduced few for this testing. According to the web, only Omegas passed but that doesn't retract in quality and/or prestige as we all know. I believe most movements for space purpose were -- or similar to - the Valjoux 7734.

Edited by bobm12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Two pins or screwdrivers angled out slightly, pressing through from the barrel centre from the opposite side so they contact just clear of the hole in the lid? eg. Strap pin driver needles or similar.
    • That's a good idea - shrinking down the nut and wrench size from the old casebook trick!
    • I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.    
    • I didn't think pulling to set position would work harden the spring, in that position it is stressed where the arm starts. By work hardening i meant rapid polishing at that point, a bit like polishing a pivot work hardens as it compresses the steel. I doubt polishing by hand would achieve much in that respect though. Its finished, arm polished up mostly at the join to the bridge's main body. I'm ok with it, the screw holes aren't great as i had to open them up by redrilling and positioning it was difficult, I'm not much use with a loupe, opening up with a file might be a better option for me or i could just use the correct drill size 😅. And the detent is way too deep, i had to guess that with the stem release out of position and sat on top, but i only took one measure and went for it, no slowly slowly catch your monkey 😅. First go I'm happy , well sort of, it works and thats a big thing for me, next one will have a bit more finesse.  Anyone thats interested, after filing, i used a 2000 grade home made diamond  micro file and then 20 micron film, the film is much better than wet and dry, more stable to use and doesn't shed cheap grade grit everywhere , then auto polish on a sponge pad.
    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
×
×
  • Create New...