Jump to content

Just what is Military Style

Piff
 Share

Recommended Posts

Piff Member

Piff

Posted
Posted

I’ve been seeing a lot of posts and articles describing watches as “military-style”. This got me to wondering just what attributes qualify a watch as such? Are there specific functions that must be present or is it purely an aesthetic?

I mean, I think I can pick out a military-style watch if I'm looking at one, but when pressed by my wife to describe it, the words I use (chunky, hard-wearing, easily read dial, to name a few) could also be used to describe sport watches, really. I don’t want to be going around calling a sport watch a military watch or vice versa.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RyMoeller Super WRT Addict

RyMoeller

Posted
Posted

Based on the specifications for the A-11 (the US service watch during the second world war) the following were requirements:

  1. "Durable" dull black dial
  2. Numerals, hands and graduations painted in white (no luminous compound)
  3. Central sweep second hand
  4. Roman numerals
  5. Hack

While the A-11 only had numerals 1 through 12 on the dial, later service pieces had a interior ring of numerals from 13 through 24 painted on the dial for military time reading.  Most military watches that I'm aware of are manual wind pieces too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodabod Distinguished Member

rodabod

Posted
Posted

Hacking seconds were generally only a requisite of pilots and navigators. The same applies to having centre-seconds, as having all hands running concentrically reduces the duration taken to read the time.

My general opinion is simple legibility, hard-wearing, and often with a large crown for winding while wearing gloves. 

The British military watches were largely designed by the Ministry Of Supply (later MoD) and they put their design specs out to tender. Each manufacturer would then have their own take....

If you look at the IWC and JLC Mk11 watches, both latterly had a square-ended hour hand to increase legibility. This was driven by the MoS. JLC re-used their case design from their circa 1945 WWW Army-issue watch, but changed the material to stainless steel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • joelcarvajal
      Gamblin Gamsol for cleaning?

      By joelcarvajal · Posted

      Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • GuyMontag
      1972 Bulova President "E" Sea King 11ACACB movement

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Zedster
      Movement inserted from crytal side

      By Zedster · Posted

      Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • nevenbekriev
      Main spring

      By nevenbekriev · Posted

      Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • ManSkirtBrew
      1972 Bulova President "E" Sea King 11ACACB movement

      By ManSkirtBrew · Posted

      I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
×
×
  • Create New...