Jump to content

India screw plate versus antique Swiss Martin et fils


syfre

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I need a 0.7mm screw (head 1.2mm) and the corresponding tap so i give a try to the india mini taps and screw plate that you can find on the bay.

The set comes with a 0.7 mm tap and that the one i wanted.

First, i measured the tap and the 0.7mm give 0.66mm and  the 0.8mm give 0.78 on my Mitutoyo (not chinese) caliper. 

I made a test on a brass piece, drill at 0.6 for the 0.7mm tap and at 0.7 for the 0.8 mm. I was able to tap both with out problem. I believe a 0.5mm drill would had been better for the 0.66 tap but drilling at 0.5mm on a bench drill (a proxxon) is tricky.

(I gave a try to the chinese carbide drills you can found on the bay for a couple of dollars. It was a good surprise as they cut really good and don't break on the first time. The set i tried come from THK)

Now the screw. I turn a blue steel rod at 0.8 and try the 0.8 hole of the india screw plate. It was a total failure, the screw plate didn't cut.

As it was my first try at making screw i though i was doing something wrong. May be the steel is too hard ? I decided to try my antique "Martin et fils" screw plate. It is a L model (L means "Latar" thread serie) and i found online the corresponding measurement : the hole 12 must be 0.798mm 0.164mm pitch which is the closer of the 0.78mm india tap (but as the india tap pitch is unknown so there was little chance they match). The "Martin and fils" cut my steel rod like butter. I tried the thread (0.78mm) on the tapped hole and it matched.

(These old screw plates are not consistent, you have to made a test thread and measure it to know the exact values)

I then made a screw using the "Martin et fils" and test it on my test hole : it matched but it was not as tied as you can expect.

[When making a screw the most difficult step is to make the slot. I believe the right way is to use a mill attachment on the lathe and a rotary cutter to cut the slot but without that making the slot "by hand" with a saw is really difficult. After many tries i finally succeed using these steps : first anneal the screw, it's absolutely required, the steel must be softer that your saw. Second, start the slot using a scalpel with a hard blade.  Third, cut the slot with the saw. It's a good idea to made the screw head higher than the final dimension so that you can restart if you mess.]

Not satisfied by the result i decided i needed a tap which exactly match the "Martin et fils". In "The modern watchmakers Lathe and how to  use it"  Archien B Perkins describes how to made a tap from a screw plate. The process is simpler that you can thought. The final tap is a little short because the first one i made break during the thread cutting. I made the second shorten to avoid a new brake. Using the home made tap the screw fits perfectly.

[To made the tap : use an old drill, anneal it, turn it to dimension (0.8mm for my number 12 hole), cut the tread, file the thread three times at 120° using the lathe indexing plate to form the tap and sharpen using an india and arkansas stones, harden then temper ]

I made several tests with the india screw plate and never succeed. The taps are not bad but without the corresponding screw plate there are of little interest. Finally, as you may expect; the antique Swiss screw plate is the great winner.

 

5a9c41e57d30a_screwplatestaps800x600.jpg.a4c4345fa52706c749530b1301f4ddd5.jpg

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an Indian one and it is shite. I did cut a screw with it using annealed rod once. Not very pretty. No chance with blue steel rod!

The mini HSS tap and die sets are good though. Made in China, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...