Jump to content

Any experience with this kind of case?


avion

Recommended Posts

I've worked on these cases..

The movement fits into a caseback and the crystal is fitted on the caseback. Then the whole assembly is press fitted into the upper case.

First check if the upper case does NOT go around the stem (in case my memory is faulty!). Then press on the crystal while supporting the lugs. If you're using your thumbs be aware that it can 'let go' suddenly.

The reason I remember these cases is that replacements crystals are not easy to source and I usually had to modify something to fit.

Good luck.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Ishima - no it's definitely not a screw type

@anilv - I'm not sure what you mean by "check if the upper case does NOT go around the stem". I'd be surprise if the method of pressing the crystal should be applied here since it's stated on the baseback " Benrus #2155 - Remove with blade"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

If the back doesn’t come off, then it comes out from the front. It will have a two-piece stem. You pull the stem, lift off the glass and the movement can be taken out.

thanks. So something like in:

 

from minute 1:05

I need to use the blade after to take the bezel out ?

If so, I shall check if the stem is indeed a two-piece stem and let you know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, anilv said:

The reason I remember these cases is that replacements crystals are not easy to source and I usually had to modify something to fit.

Good luck.

Anilv

I'm glad to know that it's not just me. I've been going nuts trying to find a crystal to fit what looks to be a ladies Sea-Hawk, possibly aka, "Mermaid", for this type case. What makes it difficult for me is that the, at least arguably, most important dimension is the ID of the crystal, not the OD, as is the usual case. I've tried a couple of different sizes, without the step, and I'm getting close, but still don't have the dial covered yet. :-(  I don't remember it being as difficult with my men's Sea Hawk. But this ladies version is a tough one.

As far as the OP's watch, I don't know if it does need the Benrus press, but the company did make a special tool for their waterproof cases.  And yes, the watch back does say to use a "watch blade", so I have my doubts, as the Benrus tool is a screw-fed press, i.e. very un-blade-like. I have the tool, but still no crystal. Good luck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MrRoundel said:

As far as the OP's watch, I don't know if it does need the Benrus press, but the company did make a special tool for their waterproof cases.  And yes, the watch back does say to use a "watch blade", so I have my doubts, as the Benrus tool is a screw-fed press, i.e. very un-blade-like.

The press is to close the case, but to open it you go around the case back seam with a sharp blade. A normal "case knife" won't work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 3:39 PM, vinn3 said:

first verify that you have a "two part" stem.  or take the crystal out with the "claw tool"  as illustrated above.  vin

After giving it a few shots I'm quite positive that this is not a two parts stem :/

Any other suggestions? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Some two-piece stems are sods to pull out. I used my nippers, pull the button out to set hands and with nippers behind give one hell of a tug.

 

I used nippers and strong leverage. If it's a two parts, then it must be glued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the original image of the back of the watch, and the fact that the "Benrus" is slightly askew, I'm pretty convinced that this is a conventional "back-loader". It would be unforgivable of Benrus to have a crooked logo on the back of a one-piece front-loader, no? Of course, I  don't know that there weren't some sort of two-piece front-loaders made. If that's the case, I'm back to not-quite-square one.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
    • Why just the bottom mike ? Is it worth polishing the whole arm ?
    • The one thing I took time over was to round and polish the curves at the bottom of the jumper arm. The slightest mark (left over from cutting of filing) acts as a stress raiser, just where you don't need it. 
    • I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.
×
×
  • Create New...