Jump to content

Omega 551 MS?


jdm

Recommended Posts

I'm getting a new MS to service my Constellation Chronometer. For the 551, Cousins actually returns 550 parts: GR25331X 1.05 x .11 x 360 x 9.5. But the 550 should be different, 17 jewels to begin with.
I suspect 551 and 552 are the same so correct is: GR2628X 1.10 x .105 x 360 x 11 Automatic

Can someone confirm? I do not want to dismantle the mov.t as I will not be doing the work myself on this piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the Omega 551 mainspring interchanges with quite a few Omega watches list below.. Then what's interesting is this is the best fit list of cross references the mainspring catalog doesn't 100% agree with this.  Although looking at the catalog it looks like all of the spring is if there is a variation are so close it's not going to matter.

OME 550 (CD1)
OME 551
OME 552
OME 560 (CD1)
OME 561 (CD1)
OME 562 (CD1)
OME 563 (CD1)
OME 564 (CD1)
OME 565 (CD1)
OME 750 (CD1)
OME 751 (CD1)
OME 752 (CD1)

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jdm said:

I'm getting a new MS to service my Constellation Chronometer. For the 551, Cousins actually returns 550 parts: GR25331X 1.05 x .11 x 360 x 9.5. But the 550 should be different, 17 jewels to begin with.
I suspect 551 and 552 are the same so correct is: GR2628X 1.10 x .105 x 360 x 11 Automatic

Can someone confirm? I do not want to dismantle the mov.t as I will not be doing the work myself on this piece.

Pm sent

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rodabod said:

The 550 through to 752 listed above are all the same base caliber, therefore the same mainspring.

They could be the same base, but as mentioned above Generale Ressorts and Cousins UK list different mainsprings for e.g. 551 and 552.

Once again the link to GR catalog (with numerous hand corrections):
https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/7810_GR Pages 141 - 150.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The additional jewels for the 24 jewels movements is for the auto winder, so shouldn't effect the loading of the gear train. The balances I believe are all the same, with some receiving additional adjustment for chronometer grading. I wonder if the GR reference is made from measurements of original springs fitted, and perhaps Omega updates them over time? Perhaps the metallurgy of the springs changed through the years, although all would be white alloy. The GR catalogue also quotes various springs for the Cal 26X range, but I believe these should probably all be the same. There's an argument that running a centre-seconds hand adds to the load (it will typically reduce amplitude by something like 5-10 degrees when adjusted) but that's not enough to significantly affect performance.

I see that on the Cousins website they list three different springs if you search for a Cal 565...

On my Cal 552 I have a 1.10 x .105 x 360 (11) spring which reaches 300 degrees amplitude, if that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's another thought here which is it doesn't really matter what you perceive the spring is supposed to be. Your unfortunately stuck with the problem of what spring can you get today. This is a common problem with American pocket watches there might have been three or four different sizes of a spring for a specific watch that came in various jewel counts. Then the early steel springs have a different strength then the modern white Springs and today you just get one spring..

Then If you look at the current Omega technical documents for the 551 in the parts list it refers to the mainspring as this 550/1208 So the number 550 is the base caliber Omega's telling you to use the 550 mainspring. The same thing with the mainspring barrel the complete barrel for the 550 is identical to the 551.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
    • nevenbekriev- You nailed it with your description of me and my reaction when the clock started ticking again. I am a newbie.  I love the sound and idea of mechanical clocks but the idea of owning one and trying to keep them running has never appealed to me. My wife bought this one and an antique German wall clock.  When I looked into having someone repair them for me, the universal response was "it's really expensive to work on them, you should just replace the movement". So, I had nothing to lose, I started researching them and opened them up. The wife is happy because she hears the sound of the clocks again. But I have gone down the "accuracy" rabbit hole. In the vertical position, the balance wheel was not floating. It was sitting on the bottom of the frame. I adjusted the lower spring collet and got it floating. It easily passed the 270 degree 3 to 5 minute oscillation test. It took 8 minutes for the wheel to completely stop moving.  I put it the unit back in the movement and checked the safety pin. It does not touch the safety roller anywhere in +/-270 degrees rotation from neutral position. But the amplitude of the rotation with the spring fully wound is weak based on what you are saying. It rotates +/-90 degrees from the neutral position.  No, I did not take the movement completely apart.  That seemed way outside my skill set at the time. There is a reason I became an electrical engineer and not a mechanical engineer. I am much more comfortable with moving electrons than tiny moving metal parts. Will I do it in the long run? Anything can happen. I don't seem to be able to let it go.
×
×
  • Create New...