Jump to content

Earnshaw Skeleton stopped


jp278

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I've got a Thomas Earnshaw Academy that's completely stopped working. It was dropped from a few feet onto a bathroom rug and unfortunately the minute hand managed to come loose. 

I got a watchmaker to put the hand back on for me but to get the watch working again would've been around £200 (more than the watch is worth). The balance wheel isn't moving and the main spring is fully wound. If the watch is tapped or shaken slightly the balance wheel does spin back and forth a little but nowhere near what it should. I'd also add that nothing looks out of place, the hairspring seems to be alright through the exhibition case. 

Because the balance wheel does spin slightly if the watch is shaken, is it more likely to be an issue between the main spring and balance? Or is it worth writing off the movement and replacing the watch?

Thanks in advance for any help, sorry if it's a tad vague! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I googled the watch. Does the movement look like this? It does have incabloc protection which should prevent a short drop onto a rug, and you said the balance does tic for a few? If the balance staff got bent that would explain its erratic behavior,but also the escape wheel could have been damaged. The movement can be repaired, but if you don't have the necessary tools or skill, it will cost you. The alternative is to sell it for parts or repairer's special.

J

5a60d0fb77835_ScreenShot2018-01-18at11_52_48AM.png.fdccc70e4bd448f95ed9e74d5485b94b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, fjseal said:

Is it possible that the impulse jewel has become disengaged from the pallet fork, or could that not happen?

YEs that could happen. If the watch was running when it fell, which it is safe to say it probably was, then the pallet fork jewel(s) could have become loosened or sustained a chip upon impact. 

J

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
×
×
  • Create New...