Jump to content

Can Venus 175 & 178 parts be interchanged


Recommended Posts

According to Cousins parts database there are 2 alternative chrono runners for the 178. One with a height of 7.8mm from the Venus 150 (and 175) and one with a height of 9.2mm from the Venus 152.

However the Venus 178 parts list https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/993_Venus 178.pdf says its the same part as the 175. If you have the old one you can measure it to check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, StuartBaker104 said:

According to Cousins parts database there are 2 alternative chrono runners for the 178. One with a height of 7.8mm from the Venus 150 (and 175) and one with a height of 9.2mm from the Venus 152.

However the Venus 178 parts list https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/993_Venus 178.pdf says its the same part as the 175. If you have the old one you can measure it to check.

Thanks yes I do have the old one so I will check

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On many Swiss movements the chronograph runner is part 8000- that's kind of standard nomenclature.

The thing to consider is the length of the shaft for the runner on a 178 vs a 175.  Manual wind chronographs with an hour recorder often have runners with a longer shaft- the reason for this is that the dial has to sit 1mm or so off the plate in order to accommodate the gearing for the hour recorder; so it wouldn't surprise me if the shaft is longer on a Venus 178 chronograph runner as opposed to the Venus 175 runner.  The same goes for the minute recording runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/01/2018 at 9:16 PM, RyMoeller said:

On many Swiss movements the chronograph runner is part 8000- that's kind of standard nomenclature.

The thing to consider is the length of the shaft for the runner on a 178 vs a 175.  Manual wind chronographs with an hour recorder often have runners with a longer shaft- the reason for this is that the dial has to sit 1mm or so off the plate in order to accommodate the gearing for the hour recorder; so it wouldn't surprise me if the shaft is longer on a Venus 178 chronograph runner as opposed to the Venus 175 runner.  The same goes for the minute recording runner.

Thanks I looked into it and there is a difference in the length.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...