Jump to content

Subtle timegraph issues?


dieale2

Recommended Posts

I am using tg-timer to time an Unitas 6340. The ebay seller said it was serviced. Apart from the slow rate, it actually looks pretty good. However, I noticed some subtle problems with the waveform of the graph. First, on the bottom panel, there is an extra noise detected. According to this, something is glazing in the balance. Second, in the middle panel, right before the pallet locks the wheel, there is an extra noise. Does that mean the balance is hitting something it's not suppose to?

I am new to watch repairing so I am wondering if I am reading this graph right.

unitas6430.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another timegraph of a watch. It's a vintage Russian watch that I bought from ebay. It looks like it obliviously needs a rebuilt from the irregular chart. It doesn't say it's been serviced and you can see the results.

russian_something_something_timegraph.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May be the case but there’s not tons of info on sound wave analysis. I’ll leave it to more experienced guys to comment.

I’d stick to the standard rate, BE and amplitude on a few positions.

I would go chasing the sound waveform if all else looks fine.

Of course, just MHO.

Cheers!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a number of things that can cause this You need to carefully observe the balance wheel under a loupe is it untrue? and catching somewhere? pallet fork bridge maybe, is the hairspring out of shape and catching the center wheel ? 

careful observation of the balance may make the cause obvious.

Timegrapher's can show you symptoms  but quite often you have to do the diagnosis.

It should also run better than -90 seconds a day

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

May be the case but there’s not tons of info on sound wave analysis. I’ll leave it to more experienced guys to comment.

I’d stick to the standard rate, BE and amplitude on a few positions.

I would go chasing the sound waveform if all else looks fine.

Of course, just MHO.

Cheers!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Sorry, meant “I wouldn’t go chasing...”





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rather liked something that my instructor said when I was in school don't please the timing machine. Timing machine points you in directions gives you clues but perhaps think of it more as reading a crystal ball it's not always an exact science. Then when you toss in the Oscilloscope part and start trying to make interpretations from that things get much more complicated. If you get obsessed about having perfect waveforms which are going to be absolutely impossible to have you going to be chasing your tail forever.

Then you have a rather impressive amplitude which is a little excessive?

Then realistically to do proper analysis of a watch it needs to be done in multiple positions. Problems don't always show up when the watch is in only one position. So what tends to work well is six position timing. So this is dial-up and dial down and Use of the crown is used as a reference which would be crown up down left and right.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I will comment the picture in the first post: 

- the extra noise in the bottom is most probably a ringing hairspring. It comes from sti:cky regulator pins and does no harm (often you can hear this ringing).

- there is no extra noise in the middle, waveform is absolutely normal. The tick noise can contain three, four or more single pulses. If you wonder where they come from, study books dealing with escapements.

What else you can see in the same picture: your TM does not recognize the first pulse of the noise! A common issue of certain TMs,  A Weishi user has no chance to recognize this faulty measurement, your scope picture  fortunately shows it. Hence the too high amplitude value, what JohnR already mentioned.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, praezis said:

What else you can see in the same picture: your TM does not recognize the first pulse of the noise! A common issue of certain TMs,  A Weishi user has no chance to recognize this faulty measurement, your scope picture  fortunately shows it.

A recent Mark's video documents that: A fault not revealed by a standard time-grapher.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello everyone, for what it's worth, here is my approach: 1. Escape wheel submerged in Epilame, then dried quickly with a hairdryer. Then the final tip of the pivots are cleaned by poking into pithwood. The logic being that the Epilame is removed at the intended contact point (to avoid any residue that may mix with the oil), but remains in the areas where oil is not supposed to spread to (further down the pivot towards the wheel). The escape wheel teeth also benefit from having Epilame to keep the 9415 in place.  2. I use a syringe to treat only the pallet stones. I suspend the pallet fork with some Rodico so that the stones hang downwards. I notably use a rather thick needle where a drop WON'T form, but rather where the Epilame liquid stays in the needle tip, which I then dip into the pallet stones. It requires some practice to get the right amount of Epilame into the needle tip, but it works for me now. This way, no drop will "jump" onto the pallet fork and potentially go all the way to the pivots.  3. I let the movement run for a few minutes without lubricating the pallet stones... to scrape off the Epilame in the intended contact "channel". Then I remove the balance again and lubricate the exit pallet stone with 3-4 successive drops. See the "channel" that forms on the pallet stone in the picture -- not so easy to see, but it's visible.       I am conflicted about the use of Epliame in balance jewel settings. My impression is that the two jewels sufficiently suspend the oil (even 9010). Apparently Rolex recommends NOT to use Epliame there (heard from a former Rolex service center watchmaker), as it could cause additional wear. Apart from that, I follow specific instructions where I can find them. E.g. the infamous Rolex reverser wheels or sometimes (parts of) the seconds wheel. Exception: I'm currently servicing an Eta 2824 and will probably ignore the service sheet that recommends treating the whole keyless works with Epilame and then using HP1300... I'll skip the Epilame and use 9504 grease.        
    • I'm going to give this a try today/tomorrow on my UTC33/Seiko 66, thanks!
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Don't forget Mark is a hard working watch maker so he is also tied up with work. I'm sure he is keeping his eye on this forum making sure it is running along nicely. 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.    
×
×
  • Create New...