Jump to content

Loupe / eyeglass / eyepiece


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ajdo said:

Thx JDM. Yes, have heard good things about ASCO loupes. Their are supposed to be on the higher end a fairer price wise. 

ASCO is just the company name as "white label ". Would be good to know if lenses are glass on the cheap ones, and if the CHF 234 ones can be insured <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I am looking for loupe(s) with a nice glass. From experience in another hobby, I learned a nice less magnified glass is better than a lesser glass quality at higher magnification.

 

A good topic.  I only have crap loupes, and its likely a problem.  With them, 10x often doesn't feel like enough for lathe work.....perhaps better glass would change that.

I had a young watchmaker over not to long ago.  He did years in school in Switzerland and has his own business so is not a wannabe (like me).  He said he spent over $100 on his loupe.  Not sure where you go to get a loupe that expensive, but I guess the point is he felt it was a crucial tool where you should get the best.  Probably something to consider in that.

On all my cheapos, I've ended up grinding slots in them so they don't fog up.  I think Bergeon has one with slots, but I always wonder why it wasn't more of a standard thing, no one else has them fog up?  I also use various DIY rigs to hold them on my head - it always seem about impossible to hold onto with they eye for more than a minute or os

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much appreciated. I tend to agree with the young watchmaker you know. By-once-cry-once and enjoy the hobby more.

From upgrade experience in other hobbies, without going overboard on desired items, one spends more on upgrades than buying right away what they would feel more comfortable with. It’s like running with flip-flops instead of getting running shoes :) Also good tools are re-sellable. Although I also understand higher cost tools may be an issue.

Will post my findings after my research and gathering other people’s input. It may help other newbies get into this hobby more easily. 

Thank you... AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The really expensive Asco loupes are achromats, the next level down (140 bucks) are aplanatic. As I've always understood, achromats are usually also aplanatic, so they deliver accurate color and an undistorted view across the lens. Aplanatic might have some color error. The color gets important when dealing with precious stones but isn't an issue for us watchmakers. I have several of both, and honestly can't tell which is in my hand without looking at the loupe body to see.

In lower powers, the aplanatic issue is sort of a non-issue, as the simple single double convex lens delivers a good image. In higher powers it's almost a necessity that the loupe be a double lens design or there is awful distortion. Most good brands go to double lens groups (two single convex lenses) at around 10x. Seems like there used to be more offerings of double lens loupes in the 5x-ish range, I have a Wild Heerbrug 5x with double lenses and am pretty sure I have an old Asco or Bergeon or two lurking around here the same.

I think all the current offering from the Swiss suppliers are good, you can't go wrong with Asco/Bergeon/Horotec.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much appreciated @NickelSilver, could not find any clear technical information about watchmakers loupes on internet that made as much sense as what you wrote. 

I am sure others will benefit as well from your wisdom on the subject! 

Actually, after your explaination, JDM’s link from this morning is much clearer. It shows the type of glass in ASCO loupes:

http://www.schurch-asco.com/e-shop/catalog/index.php?cPath=114_115&osCsid=d8c3a6eb43bf762fdb59e1e15c3a6fc7

Thank you... AJ

Edited by ajdo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a lot of those Indian aluminium loupes (no. 2...3.5) lying around in my workshop, handy like ball pens.
Today I compared one with a Bergeon 4422 that I use on my bench.
Both are single glass lens. With naked eye I could not find any advantage of the Bergeon. Same sharpness and clearness, same blurring around the edge.

Frank 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hello

I realized that I mostly use x6 mag?, distance 45 mm and object display 33 mm, why I now understand it makes me tired because I tilt face to check a lower level of a movement. :blink:

I hear x4-5 mag is most common and therefore acquired an aplanatic bergeon loupe no. 2.5 with x4 mag. But it works at a distance around 40 mm which is near x6.7 according to attached info from CousinsUK. Seems not right?  Should I buy a standard version? 

I want a loupe for the general screwing and unscrewing major wrist watch movement components, where I can keep the neck stretched and the screw driver away from cheek:unsure:. I imagine 70-90 mm and strong enough magnification to display a movement around 35 mm. 

Screenshot_20191011-192407.png

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi TheFixer

Well, I believe good lighting makes it easer.

Despite a good sight, I feel more comfortable using loupe when a tool gets in contact with a component. 

Hand motion is more controllable under a loupe due to reach, which prevents slippery of chosen tool. 

But thats just my opinionB)

 

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khan said:

Hi TheFixer

Well, I believe good lighting makes it easer.

Despite a good sight, I feel more comfortable using loupe when a tool gets in contact with a component. 

Hand motion is more controllable under a loupe due to reach, which prevents slippery of screwdriver and scratches. 

But thats just my opinionB)

 

lighting I need to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a 3.5x, obviously 10x is good for checking parts. I use Cousins clip on as i need Glasses for Reading etc. As said lighting is very important, surprising how things look so much easier. But we all have our own ways, and techniques, so best to find what your most comfy with.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Have any of you tried Dental/Doctor Magnifiers? I've found I need stereo vision while working on movements. I get migraines frequently and I've found the single loupe to trigger them. I currently have a visor that just doesn't stay in place, so I was hoping someone had experience working with these.

s-l1600.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are uncommon among watchmakers. Since the object you're working on is small and doesn't move, unlike an human, when strong magnification is needed a stereo microscope is used instead.

 

 

Edited by jdm
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be interested to see if anyone's using this type of magnifier, the different models vary in magnification and working distance.. I just dislike loupes, and tend to spend a lot of time with my microscope - which is great but not always ideal for everything.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I invested in some Carl Zeiss binocular magnifiers some years ago. They are fairly adjustable, but if you have different doipter needs for each eye are useless. They are only 2.3x mag, compared to 3.5, 4, or 5x which is typical. The working distance is quite large though.

I put them on sometimes, but honestly if I'm the least bit struggling with my 3.5x loupe I slide over to the binocular microscope. Way easier. I highly recommend AO (american optical) scopes, they are under the radar and equivalent to modern Leitz and Nikon scopes. You can always get a dud though (true for any scope 30+ years old).

There are some new "magnivisor" type binocular loupes that have been coming out, with LED lights and everything that look kinda cool, but actually my biggest concern is the lighting, as it's often easier to assess something with a fixed light source.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a dentist, I have been using binocular loupes for almost 20 years. But it's just unnatural to use it for watch repair. When doing watch repair, I prefer to hunch up with the watch right in front of my nose, with wrist and elbow supports. I find that this gives me the best stability, especially after a cup of coffee.

And binocular loupes have many designs. The 1 in the picture might not be suitable for everyone. It offers adjustable interpupillary distance, but there is no adjustment for declination angle and optical plane height. So unless your face fit the frames perfectly, the loupes might not work for you.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I'm looking for recommendations based on everyone's experience for the optimal loupe magnification/focal length that works the best for pallet jewel or escape wheel lubrication with 9415 grease. Is 10X sufficient or does higher power work better; if the latter is true at what point is the focal length too close for practicality?

I've been using a hand-held 10X triplet lens for that one task but looking for an aplanatic eye loupe, and they're available as 10X, 12X, 14X. Any thoughts and experiences are appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fixermole said:

I'm looking for recommendations based on everyone's experience for the optimal loupe magnification/focal length that works the best for pallet jewel or escape wheel lubrication

What works for me may not work for you - personal preferences.

x10 is fine, anything more - you will have to get closer, less comfortable to work with.

I like using microscope. You may want to read this:

https://meijitechno.com/how-to-change-magnification-on-stereo-microscopes/

select EMZ-5 as an example with x10 eyepieces and note he working distance, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Didn't you see the impact on your time machine? 🙂 Nobody told me this / or read it in any books but whenever I have a reading like yours one of the first things I check is the plate screws and in the majority of the cases the readings get better after tightening them, smoothing out your curves. If they are tighten enough it makes no sense to tighten them more as it brings no benefit but excessive force might cause the screwheads to brake off. You have the feel for it after a while. I have seen cases where the plate screws were not tight on purpose just to sort out some end shake issues but needless to say that's not the right way to go. Plate screws must be tight enough  just like the critical screws in automotive otherwise you screw up the whole movement in my opinion. I must stress that this is only my own opinion and i am just a hobbyist. 
    • I remember when I was in school the instructor would use whale oil on some problematic little tiny ladies watches because he felt it was a better oil. then for my birthday on my friends gave me a bottle of vintage nye watch oil. Complete with the advertisement inside which I have scanned below and what I find interesting is it hasn't gone bad in the model and it is super super thin I'm guessing the viscosity of water basically. then somewhere in the discussion group within the last year or so somebody purchased one of these bottles off of eBay and was using it on their watch. After all a bottle watch oil is? Apparently it was an expensive I'm guessing or it's what they had or something no idea what the final outcome was other than I found it amusing. then somewhere in the Internet somewhat it made up this interesting chart down below. I believe the first natural oil is there 8000 oil. Notice the friction properties in the first two columns in other words it's really good at reducing friction better than anything else.  But it does have additional specifications like contact angle which is almost never found in any spec sheet which has to do with how likely it is to spread. Big numbers are bad in those two columns and you can see spreading test it's very bad. So basically it's a really outstanding oil for a short period of time before it spreads away and of course being natural it has a habit of probably going bad very soon the best oil of course is Elgin oil at least the second version of their oil very good at reducing friction and very good at staying wherever you place it and still very fluid oil viscosity wise. then one of the most famous oils of all Swiss 9010 that I personally don't like and don't use quite a ways down on the chart personally prefer 9020 which unfortunately is not listed on this chart. It slightly heavier viscosity and has a little nicer contact angle those more likely to stay wherever you put it versus 9010 which universally requires epilam if you would like to stay wherever you putting it. then if you're in the viscosities here's an interesting chart that I found on the discussion group. ou will note there some minor variations between the viscosities listed here and the chart up above which may be attributed to the difference in temperature  universally everything is supposed to be at 20° C and the chart up above is at 40° C. Because what becomes interesting on the chart is 8000 is listed out of viscosity of 95 which does agree with their technical information and the PDF for the oil lists at 40° it is 41 where up above the chart everything is either listed as 50 or light whatever that means? Then Elgin oil is listed on the chart in a clever interesting way. you look on the chart at a viscosity of 125 you'll find Dr. Tillwich LGN oil which is the synthetic version of Elgin oil. Many years ago they had a request and gathered up a whole bunch of samples and synthesize the oil and for a while it was available for sale although it was rather expensive I had seen a bottle for about $100. and as far as viscosities go it does appear to be right in both charts in other words at 20° it's 125 and at 40° it's 50. So unfortunately it brings up the problem of viscosity or better yet contact angle determines the spread ability of your lubrication unfortunately we typically don't get contact angle we just get viscosity. So the casual trend is a heavier oil tends to not spread although as we can see from looking at the chart that isn't hundred percent true. As far as reducing friction goes viscosity doesn't necessarily come into play here either. Or basically we don't have enough of the right tech sheets to make a real proper comparison.
    • Somewhere in the back of my mind i thought you had the jewelled seitz pivot gauge, i was just asking if you had this scaled pin gauge as well. I might have just made up that thought  H. 😅
    • Yes, but the idea was that the OP wanted to be able to measure the diameter of the jewel holes in his collection of unordered jewels. Also, depending on the type of micrometre used one has to be careful not to dent the very small pivots (< 0.12mm) when pinching them in the micrometre. In my experience, the JKA Feintaster is safe to use also when measuring very small pivots. I don't understand your question, which I think was for me, no?
    • I didn't think there were any gauges under 0.1  .  I do like the old art deco tanks which are small sizes. My staff stash amounts to around half a mil. So i think I probably have that base covered. This 0.1mm set seems to be the most expensive, larger 100 piece set are about half the price. For around a 100 quid you can have sizes from 0.1 up to 4mm. Bugs me that they charge shipping for each seperate item so no combined shipping fee available.  Do you have the variable pin gauge as well ?
×
×
  • Create New...