Jump to content

Loupe / eyeglass / eyepiece


Recommended Posts

Talk to a microsurgeons secretary or even your dentist, ask what company sells them optical supplies, ask company's representative for free examination of your eyes, your eye glasses, combination of your eye glasses with the device and free trial period at home.

You pay more for just the piece at stores. Prices are not so high to shy away from.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PaulnKC....Your only a youngster...Its personal preference I know but I use a long arm microscope. I prefer it to anything else. Plenty of working space between the lens and the watch and possibly less eye strain. More expensive than most but hell you only have to buy it once.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Talk to a microsurgeons secretary or even your dentist, ask what company sells them optical supplies, ask company's representative for free examination of your eyes, your eye glasses, combination of your eye glasses with the device and free trial period at home.

You pay more for just the piece at stores. Prices are not so high to shy away from.

 

Wow - I would never have thought of that. I will have to investigate this (if I don't find something more "off the shelf" first)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chrisdt said:

PaulnKC....Your only a youngster...Its personal preference I know but I use a long arm microscope. I prefer it to anything else. Plenty of working space between the lens and the watch and possibly less eye strain. More expensive than most but hell you only have to buy it once.

I suppose age is always relative. And yes I am younger than some.

Can you share some specifics about the long arm microscope that you use?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, vinn3 said:

the "head band magnifier"  was the choice of the industry.  your eye glasses wil fit under it.  i have used that for years.    eye doctors don't like it, but what do they know?     vin

Vinn3, is this like the OptiVisor that I have? Can you give me some specifics to see exactly what you are suggesting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guy's, my apologies if this has been discussed before 

I currently use an optivisor ( DA-7) which has a focal length of 6 inches and 2.75 X magnification 

However I would love to get into using eye loupes and train myself to do so, I have a x10 loupe but the focal distance is far too short to work comfortably and I use it solely for inspection 

I know it all comes down to personal preference but I would love to hear about the focal lengths / magnification that you seasoned guys prefer for general assembly / dissembly and or inspection of jewels / pallets 

 

Thanks in advance 

Ramone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eye loupes have a sort of standard progression of working distance/magnification. If you look at the image, the "value" is the working distance in inches. Your 10x has 1 inch, which is pretty tight, and you'd only use that for inspection not general work. Most people use something between 2.5x and 5x for general work, I mostly use a 3x. As you go to higher powers it becomes more critical that the loupe be at the right distance, as your eye compensates for the little variations and the weaker the easier, so higher powers can be fatiguing.

If you get an unmarked loupe in an Ebay score or flea market, you can determine the focal length by focusing the sun (like we did as kids with a magnifying glass) and measuring the distance from lens to object. This is essentially the same as the working distance, and then you know the power.

loupe.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to "double up" on 3x reading glasses with my normal reading prescription for general work, and use a 10x loupe for close up inspection of pivots and so forth.

Good light is as important as magnification, and I use an angle-poise desk mounted magnifying lamp in conjunction with the 3x reading glasses. I also have a very bright focus-able LED torch which I can clamp in place on the angle-poise and point at the area I want to see, which helps in some circumstances.

The reading glasses are just "pound shop" cheap ones, nothing fancy. You can, at a pinch wear three pairs one behind the other, but it does get a bit awkward. Using reading glasses in this way, I can go from about 3x to just under 10x magnification, but the higher the magnification, the lower the depth of focus, so things become more fiddly as the magnification improves.

One other trick is "indirect inspection" by using the macro on my camera in conjunction with the magnifying lamp to take pictures of things I am struggling to get a decent view of otherwise. I then transfer those to my laptop and zoom in on screen.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, vinn3 said:

   I have used eye glasses for more years than I will admit.  problems and pain will occur  with magnification ,  see a opthomoligist.     vin

Thanks vinn3 for the advice, I will definitely look after my eyes,  I take breaks from time to time 

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Eye loupes have a sort of standard progression of working distance/magnification. If you look at the image, the "value" is the working distance in inches. Your 10x has 1 inch, which is pretty tight, and you'd only use that for inspection not general work. Most people use something between 2.5x and 5x for general work, I mostly use a 3x. As you go to higher powers it becomes more critical that the loupe be at the right distance, as your eye compensates for the little variations and the weaker the easier, so higher powers can be fatiguing.

If you get an unmarked loupe in an Ebay score or flea market, you can determine the focal length by focusing the sun (like we did as kids with a magnifying glass) and measuring the distance from lens to object. This is essentially the same as the working distance, and then you know the power.

loupe.jpg

Thanks nickelsilver 

This really explains it for me, I would definitely try out a 2.5X mag loupe It would be similar to the strength of the optivisor I'm using at the moment, I would probably have to be about 2 inches closer to the work which shouldn't be a problem 

Thanks for the picture of the ASCO loupes aswell 

I will use it as a reference for focal length and strength of magnification 

Thank you,  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyHull said:

I tend to "double up" on 3x reading glasses with my normal reading prescription for general work, and use a 10x loupe for close up inspection of pivots and so forth.

Good light is as important as magnification, and I use an angle-poise desk mounted magnifying lamp in conjunction with the 3x reading glasses. I also have a very bright focus-able LED torch which I can clamp in place on the angle-poise and point at the area I want to see, which helps in some circumstances.

The reading glasses are just "pound shop" cheap ones, nothing fancy. You can, at a pinch wear three pairs one behind the other, but it does get a bit awkward. Using reading glasses in this way, I can go from about 3x to just under 10x magnification, but the higher the magnification, the lower the depth of focus, so things become more fiddly as the magnification improves.

One other trick is "indirect inspection" by using the macro on my camera in conjunction with the magnifying lamp to take pictures of things I am struggling to get a decent view of otherwise. I then transfer those to my laptop and zoom in on screen.

Thank you Andy 

I will definitely need to upgrade my light I'm currently using a desk top reading lamp 

This is a poor light but I plan on getting something better,  I guess loupes are useless with no light 

I plan on using the 2.5X magnification loupe with a head spring 'holder' so I don't have to squint to keep it from falling 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally not a fan of eye loops i dont like using only one eye, i do use them for inspection and more tedious work, like staking a new staff, fitting jewels, escapement inspection, etc. Normal work i use a headband magnifier, up to 5x, because anything higher you have to get too close and head gear is banging into the table and blocking out my light. for extreme inspections like jewel holes, pivots, pivot polishing, i have a 4" led microscope from 50x up to 1000x. I can actually see surface texture of a pivot, i can even connect to computer monitor and take snap shots directly from the scope on an SD card. Purchased on ebay for $60 the best money i ever spent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AMScope also has a range of affordable stereo microscopes.  You might be able to get one in the range of $250USD, depending on what you want.  We have a couple at work that we use for PCB rework and research and they're fine.  Certainly not top quality, but functional.  I find I can work for hours using them without issue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ramone said:

Thank you Andy 

I will definitely need to upgrade my light I'm currently using a desk top reading lamp 

This is a poor light but I plan on getting something better,  I guess loupes are useless with no light 

I plan on using the 2.5X magnification loupe with a head spring 'holder' so I don't have to squint to keep it from falling 

 

  "head band  magnifier"   good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, vinn3 said:

  "head band  magnifier"   good idea.

They are pretty useful too I have one in the office.

I think the order of usefulness of different magnifiers goes something like this.

With my naked eye, I can see the watch and tell the time.

With my reading glasses I can appreciate the texture of the dial, and do simple tasks, like fit a winding stem and hands.

With an additional pair of glasses I can lift and re-fit a balance, work with most bridges, align pivots and so forth.

With the illuminated desk magnifier and my reading glasses, and some fine tweezers and a couple of pins I can do more delicate work, like sorting out hairsprings.

RIMG0595.thumb.JPG.d4177590285a63c9cfa63dc44b6108f5.JPG
With 2 pairs of 3.5 reading glasses (or a head magnifier or better still the 10x loupe) I can examine the general state of the pivots, judge the level of dirt on the jewels.

RIMG0597.thumb.JPG.5a0f2c719758d64cd45e9324e11905b9.JPG

With my optical microscope at its lowest magnification I can examine the actual wear on the pivots, jewels etc.

RIMG0591.thumb.JPG.cb3e5f82ebb442113e8ce232c06b16bd.JPG


With the next stage, I can see the surface detail of the metal finish on individual watch teeth, and the smallest of debris, and globs of gunk trapped between the teeth.

RIMG0592.thumb.JPG.b46ea622bac88fc33c6b5fc73879a5b5.JPG

The maximum optical magnification lets me see the structure of the fungal spores on the surface of the dial. :D

RIMG0594.thumb.JPG.27d9fc4f4f4e3b9876437d9400ececbe.JPG

... and finally, with my naked eye I can see that this work area is in serious need of a tidy again. :P Fortunately this is generally *not* where I tend to work on the delicate stuff, but I know what my next task is.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The microscope is just a fairly conventional, if slightly ancient optical microscope, but I can illuminate from both above and below, which helps to give good contrast.

I have an adapter that I fabricated a while back, which allows me to fix a Canon point and shoot camera in place of one of the eye pieces. It is in a box somewhere in the attic. I have yet to track it down following a house move over a year ago. :unsure:

Microscopes are another area where good controllable lighting is critical for good results.

If you want to know a little more about this particular microscope, -> click here <-

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Just buy different loupe’s and find what you are comfortable with. Our eyesight is precious; you do not want to strain your sight.

If the loupe fogs up, drill a hole in the side.

Thank for the tip Hippy,  I have experienced fogging up of the lens before 

I'll drill a hole on the side for some ventilation 

Will be getting a number 4 (2.5X magnification)  loupe soon,  a bergeon 4422 

Will give it a shot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, saswatch88 said:

personally not a fan of eye loops i dont like using only one eye, i do use them for inspection and more tedious work, like staking a new staff, fitting jewels, escapement inspection, etc. Normal work i use a headband magnifier, up to 5x, because anything higher you have to get too close and head gear is banging into the table and blocking out my light. for extreme inspections like jewel holes, pivots, pivot polishing, i have a 4" led microscope from 50x up to 1000x. I can actually see surface texture of a pivot, i can even connect to computer monitor and take snap shots directly from the scope on an SD card. Purchased on ebay for $60 the best money i ever spent.

Thank you saswatch for the info 

I'm currently using a headband magnifier aswell ( optivisor)  but I would love to try out working with loupes 

 

The microscope must be amazing to use 

I'm sure the detail at even 40X magnification is crisp 

I'll definitely look at getting one in the future for inspection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dpastl said:

AMScope also has a range of affordable stereo microscopes.  You might be able to get one in the range of $250USD, depending on what you want.  We have a couple at work that we use for PCB rework and research and they're fine.  Certainly not top quality, but functional.  I find I can work for hours using them without issue.

Thank you Dpastl 

I'll consider getting one in the future 

It would be a dream for inspection of jewels / pivots/ escapement 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This seems to be complicated case... We have many variables here and we need to exclude some of them to make some progress. We have plots that show amplitude variations, but we don't know if this variations are significant, as they can be 'amplified' or 'smoothed' by the software. So, some observation of the amplitude by eye will be of help. Then, if we really have not isochronical work, then the main reason for this would be the hairspring being not 'linear'. And not linear may be sometimes not only because 'touching', but because bad hairsping material structure. Some of the advanced watchmakers claim that repairing badly bent hairspring is useless, because this springs will never be isochronic again.  Well, my own observations are that such thing happens, but not in all the cases and it depends on the case if the result is acceptable or not. I will not suppose here that this spring has been repaired, but it has some strange behavior watching at it's work. It will be good if it is possible to test the movement with another balance or thest the balance on another movement...
    • The more common Jewel hole diameters are from about 0.07mm to 0.50mm. Those are the sizes in the Seitz jewel gauge tool.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • OK, several things to say here. The thought thay if with the old spring the movement works 16 hours, then replacing the spring will solve that - is totally wrong. With a new spring the movement probably will work for 17 hours. The power reserve is practically not reduced when the spring gets weak with the age. It is rather something wrong with the movement. As You worked on the hairspring, we need to  confirm that it is OK now before everything else. So, thake the lever out and do the free oscillations test. What is the result? I expect numbers, not only 'it is good' or 'it is not good'. Then, this is no jewels pin lever movement, so this is not unusual to have not well regulated or even worn escapement, this is the main reason that this kind of watches doesn't work as long and reliable as the jeweled escapement ones. You can find many of them with no wear at the crown and case, and this is because they stopped working normally pritty soon after purchase.
    • Welcome 🙂 Inherited watches are very tricky. Some of them, or all, do have sentimental value, perhaps not to you but perhaps to others in the family. Ruining them doesn't make you popular. Start on innocent watches who do no harm, not to your wallet nor to others 😉 BTW; for in the future it would be helpful to others to mention your location in your profile. Success 🤗  
×
×
  • Create New...