Jump to content

Replacing or Enhancing the Crown post?


Recommended Posts

Hello,

I have a watch with a very basic waterproof crown with a flush post/hidden gasket. 

I've read elsewhere that the best thing to do is to simply replace these types of crowns.

However, I'd like to somehow waterproof my watch without replacing this crown.

I'm (likely naively) wondering if i can replace the post to a japanese-style post to waterproof, or if I can use extenders and somehow sandwich a gasket between the thicker parts.

So in brief:

1. Is there a way to remove/replace the existing crown post? (I've seen crown posts being sold but am not sure how that works)

2. Are there any other options for waterproofing this type of crown?

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would help if you could tell us what the watch is and post some pictures, then tell us a little about your knowledge / ability. Some watch manufacturers have unique crown types which are difficult to replace. Some use very standardised parts. For some it is possible to get new replacements, for others it’s almost impossible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some photos! I attempted to take photos of the inside of the crown but its proving to be rather difficult.

I'm a complete novice, but I am willing to take this to a skilled watchmaker or slowly take the time to learn/practice to get this to work.

This is a very cheap but personal quartz Wenger Swiss Army (70181) that I'd like to try and keep original externally.

I'd like to be able to waterproof this crown without needing to get a new crown altogether.

Is there a way (I'm open unorthodox approaches) to add gaskets on this to restore the 100M water resistance?

Crown.jpg

Crown2.jpg

Tube.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With some bent pick, clean out what remains of the gasket inside the crown, try to measure it the best you can and order a replacement from Cousins UK. Or replace the entire crown. There isn't anything else that you can practically do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clockboy said:

If you want to truly waterproof the watch you would have to change the pipe to a screw down pipe & screw down crown. 

That is for a diver's watch really. Screw down doesn't do waterproofing, it's just a safety device to prevent accidental pulling of the crown. Good waterproofing can be had with o-rings in the crown, as in this case, or on the stem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Depends on how many atmospheres the watch is going to be subjected too. All truly waterproof watches must have a screw down crown. The weakest part with regards to water ingress is the crown & pipe. 

Yes, screw down crown is a requirement for a diver's watch, for which there is an international certification, ISO 6425

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_watch

However, as mentioned above, a screwed crown in itself does not have any waterproofing capability. You can try that yourself, remove gaskets on a screw down watch and do a pressure testing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clockboy said:

The screw down crown adds pressure to the seals thats how they work better than just a seal.

Not really. If you think about it, the screw down crown threading is just a retention mechanism. Seals are in between stem and inside pendant tube, and/or crown and and the outside of the pendant tube. They are not influenced by the screw down as it's "force vector" does not change their position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jdm said:

Not really. If you think about it, the screw down crown threading is just a retention mechanism. Seals are in between stem and inside pendant tube, and/or crown and and the outside of the pendant tube. They are not influenced by the screw down as it's "force vector" does not change their position. 

If the design of the crown incorporates a gasket that locates between the end of the case tube and the underside of the crown (Rolex Twinlock & Triplock, Vostok Amphibia) then screwing down the crown most definitely improves the seal as it increases the compression on the gasket.

http://blog.watchdoctor.biz/2016/10/09/rolex-screw-crown-works/

image.png.fad6fa1a52beed3d39dbd87d28cc9e75.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, back at the original question, I think it’s important to establish the objective, and then clarify the options and outcomes. The OP describes an ambition to get back to the original 100m waterproofness, so let’s look at that.

JDM’s answer above is about the extent of it.

If you can find an accrediter repairer who has a Wenger parts account, they may be able to obtain a new crown with the Wenger logo on it.  They will fit the crown using the correct grade of loctite to attach it to the stem, if necessary, they can replace the case tube, they will lubricate the stem and seal with the correct lubricants (both different), refit the stem and a new caseback seal (also lubricated), and then pressure test to confirm all is good.  My guess is that this would cost £70 to £100.  If the correct crown is not available then a similar style generic one could be fitted and the cost could be a little less.

A quick google search suggests that someone like InTime might be able to do this.

It is unlikely you will find a repairer who is willing to fiddle around with trying to replace the crown seal.

If you want to tackle this yourself then you have the choice of trying to find a replacement o-ring as JDM describes, or a generic crown. Loctite is optional, but adds security against the crown coming off, so I would reccomend. A pin vice is preferable to hold the stem, but smooth jawed pliers would do for a one-off. Silicone grease for the seal is recommended, but you could get away with not greasing the stem. So you should be able to do all this for around £20. You may need to shorten the stem or pack the hole in the crown if it’s a little short... read the sticky thread on fitting a new stem. Let’s assume you don’t want to spend hundreds or more on a pressure tester, so you will be guessing that all is good when you've finished.

You pays your money and takes your choice.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Marc said:

If the design of the crown incorporates a gasket that locates between the end of the case tube and the underside of the crown (Rolex Twinlock & Triplock, Vostok Amphibia) then screwing down the crown most definitely improves the seal as it increases the compression on the gasket.

Correct. But Twinlock and Triplelock are the (patented) very best of crown lock mechanisms, with features not found on the large majority of other watches, for example the extremely popular Seiko divers (O-ring on the stem), or IWC and other Swiss watches (O-ring inside the the crown). These others make about 99% of screw down crown watches ever made, from that my point above explained.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...