Jump to content

how to remover the rotor on an ETA 2452


Recommended Posts

Others I've seen have a screw in the centre of the rotor....this one, I'm sure how to remove the rotor.  It looks like this.  Thanks!

 

ETA_2452-3.jpg

 

EDIT.....ok figured it out, 2 screws and the whole automatic winder comes out, rotor is screwed on from the bottom.....should have scratch head before asking :)

 

 

Edited by measuretwice
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad you found it out!

On these watches, the rotor runs bare between the bearing surfaces formed by the rotor and the slotted retaining screw. If you have one which has too much end shake you can remove a bit of the raised portion on the inner side of the rotor, this effectively closes the bearing up. Do it a bit at a time so you don't remove too much metal. You should not have problem with the rotor hitting the mainplates as the amount removed is very little but check it anyway. In the event it does hit the movement plates then you need to grind off a bit from the edges as well.

Anilv

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch is mostly disassembled.  I didn't find any major issues so am hoping this one is a win (one of a pile of unknowns from a retired watchmaker)

I have few more questions if I could ask for help on....

The cannon pinion friction fit is I assume between the copper coloured piece and shaft?  Unlike others that are a tube pressed onto a tube, this looks like it has three sprung legs.  How to remove?  Gently press out with a staking tool?

GgDhHVX.jpg

97u3HW6.jpg

 

This assembly looks riveted together, is it supposed to come apart or run through the cleaner as is?

cUQ1JJV.jpg

SKJAtd1.jpg

 

These wheels are from the automatic winder.  the square piece looks like it might be a nut?  Not sure how they come apart, or even they do.  Any ideas how to disassemble or run them through the cleaner as is?

 

BwvZMga.jpg

 

Lastly, the barrel and lid has some light scoring from the spring.  Is this normal, should clean it up or just leave it?

Oq135d4.jpg

 

Thanks for any and all help

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pics 1 & 2 - canon pinion. This can be dismantled if needs be but there is a risk altering the tension at the friction coupling or distorting the sprung arms so I don't bother. Just run it through the cleaner as is and lubricate the friction coupling on reinstallation.

Pics 3 & 4 - The date driving wheel doesn't come apart. Just through the cleaner as it is.

Pic 5 - Auto winding reverser wheels. These don't come apart either. The official ETA guidance is that they shouldn't even be cleaned, just replaced. However that's is rarely required. Run them through the cleaner as they are. Lubricating these is a contentious subject. I have a 1 part 9010 to 30 parts naphtha solution that I dunk them in and then leave them to allow the naphtha to evaporate. This leaves them coated with the thinnest film of 9010, and I have never had any issues with them sticking. There is also a product called Lubeta which is specifically for lubricating reversers which is used in a similar way. Do a forum search or Google "lubricating reverser wheels" and you will find various solutions and much disagreement as to what should and shouldn't be considered. Find what works for you and ignore the critics :D

Pic 6 - The main spring barrel. The damage doesn't look too bad but if it were mine I would use it as it is and see how the watch performed, but I would also look out for a replacement. You could try polishing out the damage but it's fiddly unless you have a lathe, in which case mount it up in a step collet and see if you can clean it up without either weakening the parts or making too much room inside the barrel. Easiest though is to replace. When you have the problem sorted check the main spring for flatness and if it is out replace it. The problem is most likely caused by a distorted M/S and highlights what can happen when a spring is inexpertly hand wound into the barrel. You should always use a M/S winder where possible, and perfect the art of hand winding for when a winder isn't an option.

Edited by Marc
spelling correction
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the comprehensive answer!  Its really great getting help like this as no matter how many books and videos one takes in, its hard to find answers to such movement specific things.  I do have a lathe but probably won't worry about this time as you're saying its not too bad.  Also I have mainspring winders so am careful there.

I like that at all the answers were clean as is - makes life easy :)

Off to load the cleaner

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, measuretwice said:

thanks....can you comment on judging when the amount of end shake becomes a problem ?   The rotor doesn't seem to interfere with anything.

Hi,

My usual method is pressing on the rotor on the edge away from the weight. If the rotor weight has noticeable movement I would consider tightening up the bearings. Problem with any bearings which are not fully to spec is that the more freeplay the faster it degrades. On my own watches I may not do so if I know that the watch will see limited use.

A NOS rotor does turn up from time to time but this is only half the solution as it does not address wear on the other components. Previously you could 'harvest' the parts from other watches obtained cheaply but even these are thin on the ground.

On these watches if you are using them regularly  I would suggest an annual clean and oil of the automatic reversers and rotor bearings at least. When these are neglected, debris will be the result and this affects the running of the watch.

Anil

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
×
×
  • Create New...