Jump to content

Create own watch from existing movement?


Recommended Posts

I've come across this online site that sell movements without the face or the dials or anything. It is the online shop for a physical shop that is close to me but I was wondering what is the reason behind selling these movements like this? Is it to build your own watch by choosing a face and the hands and all that or is it to practice with. Some clearer info would be appreciated

 

Untitled.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could do that but in most cases its to replace an existing movement in a watch because quite often that is the most economical thing to do with quartz movements especially total replacement of the movement is often the cheapest and quickest option than expending the time and effort to fix an existing movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of these movements are quartz. When repairing a quartz watch, a new movement is often the most cost effective fix. The same can be true of inexpensive mechanical watches. That’s why most new bare movements are bought.
You could as you suggest build your own watch, and some folks will rescue a dead mechanical watch with a quartz movement.
Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaah that makes more sense. The odds of finding the exact movement for the one you need might be a bit slim? I've also wondered about the watch balance wheel. Do they all differ depending on the movement they are being used in or are the more basic mechanical watches using a standard type of balance wheel?

Thanks for the info so far. I'm most likely going to asking questions as they come up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaah that makes more sense. The odds of finding the exact movement for the one you need might be a bit slim? I've also wondered about the watch balance wheel. Do they all differ depending on the movement they are being used in or are the more basic mechanical watches using a standard type of balance wheel?
Thanks for the info so far. I'm most likely going to asking questions as they come up.
Interesting and I see where you're coming from but interchangeable parts does not denote cheapness, in fact it's the opposite. The initial set up of such machinery would be beyond the financial capabilities of most watchmakers.
Seiko enjoy a high degree of interchangeable parts including balance assemblies which is why they may be so popular with the watch repairer

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Neileg said:

Balance wheels aren’t really standardised but a dozen quartz movements might cover 90% of the watches you come across.

What diggingstony meant to say is simply that Seiko balances are interchangeable across 7S, 4R, 6R, 70x and may be even older movements. Indeed, a nice point for repairers and tinkerers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What diggingstony meant to say is simply that Seiko balances are interchangeable across 7S, 4R, 6R, 70x and may be even older movements. Indeed, a nice point for repairers and tinkerers.

Yes I understood the point. All I meant was that quartz movements are less varied than mechanical watches (on the whole).
Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...