Jump to content

Old style rubbed in jewels


TimFitz

Recommended Posts

I am ready to tackle replacing a rubbed in jewel on a Hamilton  18s #934 pocket watch movement. I have done the other kinds, but have been waiting until I have been working on watches for a few years before I try this. Many people say don't buy those old watches with rubbed in jewels, why work that hard, buy more modern ones with the screws holding them In.

Well I like a challenge,  so I have an old school set of tools to do the job. (photo attached )

Does anyone have advice on the pitfalls or tricks I need to know? Maybe a link to a video?

I would be much obliged

tool.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/11/2017 at 8:13 AM, oldhippy said:

Tim, theres a thread on this forum about rubbed in jewels. If you use the search you should find it. Good for you in having a go at something different.

Mark has done a video on rubbed in jewels

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

The thing with rubbed in jewels is everything is wonky. The original jewels had a specific form usually quite domed with a distinct bevel on the underside. If you have a stock of antique jewels you might find one that fits your pivot _and_ fits the plate/bridge diameter. Provided you have that, often the material of the bridge/plate has become quite fragile, from time as well as being work hardened from the original burnishing. So sometimes the material that you want to reburnish crumbles apart.

 

If you don't have antique jewels, friction jewels lack the pronounced bevel that takes the burnished over material. They can be modified but it's a process with diamond paste and lathes and grinding gear. Sometimes though you get lucky and a Seitz jewel will seat and hold. You also have no adjustment for height, where the jewel seats is it.

 

On many antique pieces I will bore out the whole jewel area, including the dome often cut into the plate/bridge outside the jewel. Then make a bushing that fits well and will take a friction jewel. The bushing gets its concave dome, finished properly,  jewel gets fitted, all pressed in and you have at least a few hundredths of adjustment as well and if you use german silver on a grey bridge it's invisible (for gold plated best to plate the bushing). If it's not a Breguet or other historical piece this is often the best possible repair. For a Breguet you make the jewel, period. No boring out of that stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...