Jump to content

My First Balance Staff - Need some advive


Recommended Posts

I just completed cutting my first balance staff on a lathe. All went well on the balance/hairspring side, including undercutting and leaving enough material to make the rivet. On the roller table side however, i cut a smidgen too much. Is there any way to tighten the roller table on or di i need to cut a new staff? I thought shellac on the post would harden and keep the table on. I still need to jacott the pivots, so am i waisting my time?

a661fc5f83101f0c50e6545520c5acf2.jpg9448f018ba52bc5ef968bc5b4f4572b9.jpg3c3e89d6b4af556e1689c44da6b6107a.jpg1fa364090bf8573a1573fe5b75db3049.jpga4dc217c5419d43dca0d97c40c1efb15.jpg26d4ecb70462e727ae771970d2d81a9e.jpgb2350b43733b2e39b0354d80d4f46aa5.jpg5b4c9e301b8ee136310fa056540830ed.jpg3aa5394b4d32b37db8f3cc63b55a2a67.jpg6b9c2d27bd3c565309c52db146a43f28.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just completed cutting my first balance staff on a lathe. All went well on the balance/hairspring side, including undercutting and leaving enough material to make the rivet. On the roller table side however, i cut a smidgen too much. Is there any way to tighten the roller table on or di i need to cut a new staff? I thought shellac on the post would harden and keep the table on. I still need to jacott the pivots, so am i waisting my time?
a661fc5f83101f0c50e6545520c5acf2.jpg&key=b63cfe8f836ff14588d3c1c5f13600455fa785f06c37f0c09647ab1e1c649c4b9448f018ba52bc5ef968bc5b4f4572b9.jpg&key=a150f0a233c327a68af670bb2cab24a85616bb20889a849a9c04e63f9794eaf13c3e89d6b4af556e1689c44da6b6107a.jpg&key=429ae1a5f0fa40a6eae5074b62565652e2e68ed4b84e84fa6bf4e9ac7577b0131fa364090bf8573a1573fe5b75db3049.jpg&key=4afb3571344584787b4c366efb07ac9f7704f5efbb9f37274e08c1d06a5749eea4dc217c5419d43dca0d97c40c1efb15.jpg&key=3d8c789ab151e06eac6e3d3e87d87c931ccade8993c72f9679c58c09ac46fd3326d4ecb70462e727ae771970d2d81a9e.jpg&key=becc5cd55829a6f37fe357ecef8f6529bc405976072628b86c948936a8f5cb5bb2350b43733b2e39b0354d80d4f46aa5.jpg&key=57c0ea5c34d285f72ebb03f87e472c7bc90d6407fcb6c3a4b8a0a3fbfc0aa46f5b4c9e301b8ee136310fa056540830ed.jpg&key=e2be288fe7c1abecd4f750c87b875a430eeff3b837579a7a603d8d7151987dbc3aa5394b4d32b37db8f3cc63b55a2a67.jpg&key=98fde1ccf489a7287489bf7be057875e66544264ac70259f3f4ef4b5c3fa8be16b9c2d27bd3c565309c52db146a43f28.jpg&key=6aa72996c4296f0d2638e431327f81b4de3bac241fb6ff01e769113f1f375b27
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Amazing job and well beyond my capabilities! But I'm thinking forget the staff and concentrate on the roller table.
Try closing the hole with a suitable stake. Careful not to catch the jewel

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing job and well beyond my capabilities! But I'm thinking forget the staff and concentrate on the roller table.

Try closing the hole with a suitable stake. Careful not to catch the jewel

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

Turns out you can close the hole in a balance table using the following:

e08da0802507253cbdfa3983e3813994.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It worked. Now all i need to do is reduce the pivot size.066b34e7449d8121f48dd58f3efeb696.jpg&key=2e09e2bc75e7013778e9dac2d7ced237c7beea7b6e31b66d6b374ebbc4770f7e06fd1a18ae23b55de00406c58be6b238.jpg&key=3ecc20adea0d2bb606e715d3d0865230a4b21cdacec9e042e6abe25a664672b1ad7a86877432a4f0e940e05c14273413.jpg&key=88f2283ef9e039d019b8bbe99c10d8596351212d1233fb0de3e4646d9d94f784
Remember, i play guitar, thus the long nails:)
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Excellent, is that a reverso staking set and you've used two stakes, the bottom being solid flat. Or is it a traditional stump ?

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent, is that a reverso staking set and you've used two stakes, the bottom being solid flat. Or is it a traditional stump ?

 

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

 

You are correct. Flat Stake on bottom and round one on the top. Took a bit of pounding as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have achieved what is probably the hardest thing to make in in horology. You could have used lock tight; there are many types such as a thread lock tight, many people who make parts on lathes use it.

When using a punch you have to be very careful not to split the roller.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have achieved what is probably the hardest thing to make in in horology. You could have used lock tight; there are many types such as a thread lock tight, many people who make parts on lathes use it.


When using a punch you have to be very careful not to split the roller.

Good advice. I'm going to cut a second balance staff this week. Finishing the pivots tonight, as my 4 new 0.2 and 0.4 round and flat carbide gravers are coming in tonight and a really need that round shape to finish the cone on the pivot.

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the two sets of videos on using a lathe and I have the bible book on lathes "modern watchmakers lathe and how to use it" as well as practical watch repair and many other books. I have watched and read it all so my brain has the knowledge. Then I practiced for a week (4 hours or so) on brass stock. I then cot a stem using blue steel. And then I tackled the balance staff; taking my time and measuring and fitting as I built the part. I have learned about taking it slow as I over cut the roller table shaft a bit....good lesson. Next staff will be a lot better.

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you doing anything different this time?


I am taking more time to taper the shaft so I don’t over cut any part (like the roller table last time). I also got four 0.2 and 0.4 square and round carbide gravers to finish the pivot better. I also started with 1.97 mm blue steel this time, so less cutting to the first diameter.

I am going to cut the staff with the stock attached and only leaving the Roller Table side pivot to complete. So i will complete one pivot before cutting off the part and reattaching to finish the roller side. I also purchased a triangle shaped Arkansas stone to finish the pivots, just prior to burnishing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you did ~works~ in an <insert zenophobic ethnic slur here> worker kind of way. If you blow a measurement on a staff, only solution is to start again. What you did would work on a clock, but centricity on a watch balance is too critical. By tightening the roller table in a staking set you've mangled the center and I'd be surprised if you got that thing even well poised. Like I said though, it will ~work~ but you've just forfeited precision and introduced positional timing variability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tim said:

What you did ~works~ in an <insert zenophobic ethnic slur here> worker kind of way. If you blow a measurement on a staff, only solution is to start again. What you did would work on a clock, but centricity on a watch balance is too critical. By tightening the roller table in a staking set you've mangled the center and I'd be surprised if you got that thing even well poised. Like I said though, it will ~work~ but you've just forfeited precision and introduced positional timing variability. 

It will cause poor time keeping in a clock, so in fact it will not work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experience with this is mainly pocket watches, in particular, "Waltham" The roller table is a friction fit and once removed for any reason can, on reassembly become loose, especially if removed several times. Reducing the bore size of the roller table is a method of rectification and would have Zero effect on the balance poise.
Also when fitting a new staff; even a factory manufactured one, on these old watches it is quite common to secure the balance wheel to the shaft in the way Jdrichard has done. Though a suitable hollow stump under the wheel arm is advisable, to avoid distortion to the balance wheel itself.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experience with this is mainly pocket watches, in particular, "Waltham" The roller table is a friction fit and once removed for any reason can, on reassembly become loose, especially if removed several times. Reducing the bore size of the roller table is a method of rectification and would have Zero effect on the balance poise.
Also when fitting a new staff; even a factory manufactured one, on these old watches it is quite common to secure the balance wheel to the shaft in the way Jdrichard has done. Though a suitable hollow stump under the wheel arm is advisable, to avoid distortion to the balance wheel itself.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk



Digg is correct. This is a riveted staff so there is only one way to put it on. It is NOT a friction fit staff. I could have cut another staff, however, the text books do state that you can adjust the hole on the roller table the way i did it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
    • Now this has happened I bet China or India just to name two will start to produce none genuine parts.  I did. But idiot Boris Johnson failed miserably in his negotiations. The E U stitched up the UK like a kipper. Nigel Farage  offered his help but big head Boris declined. So this is why we are in this mess all because Johnson wasn't clever enough.  
×
×
  • Create New...