Jump to content

Just wondering if you think this watch is a good one ?


Recommended Posts

There are 89 reviews on the page with 73 of those giving it 5 stars.

They are what they are good mass market quartz watches I have had two chronograph Eco drive watches both pre owned, the five year warranty is good I bought a Skyhawk A-T for less than a hundred with 3 years of warranty left on it. The Eco drive system is good but if you wear the watch under a sleeve you really have to leave the watch next to a window to get enough charge when not wearing it.I had to do that today infact with the watch I have on which is a Casio tough solar it wasnt getting enough light under my sleeve and all the hands jumped to the 12 0'clock postion and the watch stopped.

And if you dont wear it for a long time and leave them somewhere dark they can take an age to kick back into life especially the all singing dancing chronographs but the A-T did have a handy power indicator on the dial.

And like any other capacitor watch it will eventually fail and need replacement. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only my opinion. But I think the watch is very pricey for a quartz and if you really want one look for a used model. Agree with "Oldhippy" about the bracelet.
At the price advertised you could buy a very decent Seiko Automatic that would probably have a far better resale value, if you ever wanted to trade up.

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that's s good point the bracelet goes so does ur watch what's with titanium strap ?
What watch would u recommend I like that blue dial would like solar eco
 
What Seiko would be a good one ? 
Within the price range we are looking at I would recommend the Seiko skx 007 or 009. These are so popular, spare parts are cheap and in abundance. Relatively easy to work on, highly versatile and as said, being so popular, they really do hold their price well on the used market.

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, faolteam said:

Yes that's s good point the bracelet goes so does ur watch what's with titanium strap ?

What watch would u recommend I like that blue dial would like solar eco

 

What Seiko would be a good one ? 

Get a seiko 5, they come in many many combinations... and they're cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, frenchie said:

Get a seiko 5, they come in many many combinations... and they're cheaper.

There is a big difference between a solar-powered titanium watch with a sapphire crystal, and a modest automatic Seiko 5. The OP appears to be interested in the first kind, not the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jdm said:

There is a big difference between a solar-powered titanium watch with a sapphire crystal, and a modest automatic Seiko 5. The OP appears to be interested in the first kind, not the other.

That's what I get for not reading all the posts... I skimmed through an saw seiko blue dial... :) and my mind was set

How about the Seiko SNE381? Looks a lot like the Citizen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's specifically quartz (showing my bias, as I have a general dislike of Solar and Kinetic watches.) This is a far better proposition and currently can be had at £135 !
If quartz accuracy is your thing I believe these are accurate to 10 seconds a year Guaranteed b8e6f2f9af3be121ca2ef13d0a532cc5.jpg

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, faolteam said:

can someone tell me whats the diff with a titanium strap compared to a stainless steel?

also is this watch a bracelet, is it  part of the case, ?

A Ti watch or bracelet is much lighter, warmer to touch, and slightly more prone to scratch. Not everyone likes that.

You can put any strap on a watch that doesn't have an integrated bracelet, like the Seiko above. Again, that is important to some people only.

 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

A Ti watch or bracelet is much lighter, warmer to touch, and slightly more prone to scratch. Not everyone likes that.

You can put any strap on a watch that doesn't have an integrated bracelet, like the Seiko above. Again, that is important to some people only.

 

Just seen this on a webpage about the above watch WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including one or more listed chemicals which are known to the State of California to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information, go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just seen this on a webpage about the above watch WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including one or more listed chemicals which are known to the State of California to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information, go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
I'm sure the State of California have all sorts of opinions. What's the proven scientific evidence? People used to quite happily, without any measure of harm, walk around with radioactive lume! You would have to take the watch apart and breathe the stuff in or absorb through the skin to be harmful [emoji4]
Also replacing a hardlex crystal to sapphire is a simple task but slightly costly.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, faolteam said:

Just seen this on a webpage about the above watch

Which web page? Certainly not on the official Seiko one

http://seikousa.com/collections/seiko core/SNE361

It would be surprising to know that Titanium as used on watches (which is NOT Titanium dioxide) is "potentially dangerous", as  It is now the metal of choice for prosthetics, internal fixation, inner body devices and instrumentation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium_biocompatibility

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, digginstony said:

Also replacing a hardlex crystal to sapphire is a simple task but slightly costly.

About $15 unless not a common type. Plus what the repair shop will ask, which can be very little sometime.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jdm said:

But SS not Ti, and hardlex.

I beg to differ: according to Seiko's website, case and bracelet are titanium... (Or are you referring to another model you have?)

 

11 hours ago, faolteam said:

Just seen this on a webpage about the above watch 

As for the California warning, does it have something to do with the crystal (that may contain lead) rather than the bracelet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frenchie said:

I beg to differ: according to Seiko's website, case and bracelet are titanium... (Or are you referring to another model you have?)

Yes, the 381 is Ti, but the 361 is SS. 

2 hours ago, frenchie said:

As for the California warning, does it have something to do with the crystal (that may contain lead) rather than the bracelet?

Then virtually any watch or glass sold in CA should come with the warning, but it is not so. As I said, unless I see an official Seiko source and the specific chemical mentioned, I'm not convinced.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, frenchie said:

I beg to differ: according to Seiko's website, case and bracelet are titanium... (Or are you referring to another model you have?)

 

As for the California warning, does it have something to do with the crystal (that may contain lead) rather than the bracelet?

i dont know it was on Amazon.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...