Jump to content

Watchmakers Lathe Or Mini Lathe


Recommended Posts

I have been considering purchasing a watchmakers Lathe and or a mini metal lathe for making stems, staffs and other parts. What is the difference between the two lathes and can I buy a mini lathe vs a used boley for example. I have attached a photo of both.177801f6d2374a80c0fb6a00a9b72ff0.jpgbb4803edb042aa714cdb77a559809b9d.png

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the high precision required for making watch parts I would recommend a watchmakers lathe.  If buying second hand try to ensure all is  correct regarding condition.

A mini lathe is indeed a very handy tool and good for the likes of model and clock making, but does not generally have the higher precision required for watches.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the high precision required for making watch parts I would recommend a watchmakers lathe.  If buying second hand try to ensure all is  correct regarding condition.
A mini lathe is indeed a very handy tool and good for the likes of model and clock making, but does not generally have the higher precision required for watches.

So the precision is really up to the watchmakers hands rather that the mechanics of the lathe?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neileg said:

You'll not get much precision out of the watchmakers lathe pictured. Not until you have the motor and the headstock at the same end of the bed!

Neil

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Why not. The lathe being displayed is a Boley which one of the best you can purchase (in my opinion) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, jdrichard said:


So the precision is really up to the watchmakers hands rather that the mechanics of the lathe?
 

The accuracy that you work to comes down to the skill of the operator, the precision of the machine helps the operator achieve this.

He headstock bearings in a watchmakers lathe come in two types, adjustable plain taper bearings and very high precision ball races.  The ballraces fitted to watchmakers lathes are of a far higher tolerance fitted to mini lathes.

Whatever you go for try to make sure all parts match the lathe and are in excellent condition!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You certainly can make watch parts on a mini lathe. I would recommend Cowells Super Elite. Very expensive, not sure, if they are still made if not they would have an equivalent. Do not expect to be able to make such high precision parts on these cheap lathes made in china. A mini lathe uses cutting tools that are set and held in the lathe.

A watchmaker’s lathe fully equipped will do the work. You are in control of the tools when it comes to making the parts like balance staffs and the balance wheels you control the graver in your hands. For some parts, you can use fixed tooling.

I have kept this very basic, as it is a minefield.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that has not been talked about is the lathe bed, if you buy second hand, make sure it is in perfect condition from one end to the other, take the tailstock off and check underneath it has to be completely smooth, no nicks or rough marks, any imperfections leave it as it will not be accurate in machining.

When it comes to a mini lathe, I like the Unimat 3. This has many attachments it has a cast iron bed, and is very tough and is extremely accurate. It can be adapted into a milling machine with the right accessories. These lathes come up very often on ebay. Just the other week I bought one, as I thought I’d like to try my hand again with some clock work just as a hobby. I wished I never sold the one I had years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best type of machine I have found to make tiny watch staffs and pinions is a watch lathe. The major issue I ran into was having the pinions break off after being turned down past .012 inches or less. A mini lathe has more mass and power with a trade off of less "feel".  It  was designed for larger size parts, such as clock parts, and can remove metal faster by taking larger cuts. Also, due to more size  strength  and power, a larger lathe will have less deflection from the cutter pressure  thus providing more repeatable accuracy on each cut. That said, no matter how accurate the larger machine is, trying to turn a part down to .004 inches (.1mm)  can be difficult or next to impossible  due to overpowering the part.  Larger parts can, in theory, be made on a watch lathe but a larger more stable lathe would be the better way to go for larger work. If you are going to use the machine to make watch parts (particularly staffs, pinions, stems, tiny screws etc.) I think you will find the watch lathe a better way to go. As I mentioned in previous posts, the Sincere Lathe is the going to be the best and most affordable option for this type of machine. You can always, at a later date, purchase a larger lathe in addition to this to make larger parts.

I would also like to mention that some watchmakers will turn the pinion down as far as they can with the turning process and then grind or file it the rest of the way on a Jacot Lathe. This is generally not recommended as it can affect the concentricity and cylindrical properties of the pinion. The final burnishing on the Jacot Lathe should only be used only for the final  .01mm -.02mm. This is the difference between making a pivot and making something that looks like a pivot to the naked eye.

david

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD,

I hope this provides some insight toward your lathe purchase.

The best type of machine I have found to make tiny watch staffs and pinions is a watch lathe. The major issue I ran into was having the pinions break off after being turned down past .012 inches or less. A mini lathe has more mass and power with a trade off of less "feel".  It  was designed for larger size parts, such as clock parts, and can remove metal faster by taking larger cuts. Also, due to more size  strength  and power, a larger lathe will have less deflection from the cutter pressure  thus providing more repeatable accuracy on each cut. That said, no matter how accurate the larger machine is, trying to turn a part down to .004 inches (.1mm)  can be difficult or next to impossible  due to overpowering the part.  Larger parts can, in theory, be made on a watch lathe but a larger more stable lathe would be the better way to go for larger work. If you are going to use the machine to make watch parts (particularly staffs, pinions, stems, tiny screws etc.) I think you will find the watch lathe a better way to go. As I mentioned in previous posts, the Sincere Lathe is the going to be the best and most affordable option for this type of machine. You can always, at a later date, purchase a larger lathe in addition to this to make larger parts.

I would also like to mention that some watchmakers will turn the pinion down as far as they can with the turning process and then grind or file it the rest of the way on a Jacot Lathe. This is generally not recommended as it can affect the concentricity and cylindrical properties of the pinion. The final burnishing on the Jacot Lathe should only be used only for the final  .01mm -.02mm. This is the difference between making a pivot and making something that looks like a pivot to the naked eye.

david

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, david said:

The best type of machine I have found to make tiny watch staffs and pinions is a watch lathe. The major issue I ran into was having the pinions break off after being turned down past .012 inches or less. A mini lathe has more mass and power with a trade off of less "feel".  It  was designed for larger size parts, such as clock parts, and can remove metal faster by taking larger cuts. Also, due to more size  strength  and power, a larger lathe will have less deflection from the cutter pressure  thus providing more repeatable accuracy on each cut. That said, no matter how accurate the larger machine is, trying to turn a part down to .004 inches (.1mm)  can be difficult or next to impossible  due to overpowering the part.  Larger parts can, in theory, be made on a watch lathe but a larger more stable lathe would be the better way to go for larger work. If you are going to use the machine to make watch parts (particularly staffs, pinions, stems, tiny screws etc.) I think you will find the watch lathe a better way to go. As I mentioned in previous posts, the Sincere Lathe is the going to be the best and most affordable option for this type of machine. You can always, at a later date, purchase a larger lathe in addition to this to make larger parts.

I would also like to mention that some watchmakers will turn the pinion down as far as they can with the turning process and then grind or file it the rest of the way on a Jacot Lathe. This is generally not recommended as it can affect the concentricity and cylindrical properties of the pinion. The final burnishing on the Jacot Lathe should only be used only for the final  .01mm -.02mm. This is the difference between making a pivot and making something that looks like a pivot to the naked eye.

david

Well put David. What you have stated is the advice I received when I purchased my watchmakers lathe. One tool I find really useful is a "tip over rest" which I have not seen supplied with a mini lathe. Making balance staffs I find really difficult with only a couple of successes and that is after converting existing staffs. Lathe work is a whole new skill but well worth learning. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a rare find. If you can get it at a good price, jump on it. I have only seen three come up for sale in the past 40+ years. The machine has two drive systems which are the standard belt drive and a friction drive. The reason for the friction drive is unknown to me but I am sure Boley had a reason for it.

david

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think standard drive is faster than friction drive.  Boley lathes are very good; this is a watchmaker’s lathe and looks in fine condition. Find out the size of the bed, what accessories come with it such as collets, is it a 6mm or 8mm, 8mm is more popular are the collets in good condition. Size of the motor, speed variations. If you are getting it from ebay, make sure it is covered by money back guarantee; if other just make sure, you can get your full money back. Ask for close up photos of the lathe bed, ask if there is any damage to it, how true is it, what has been made on it.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard, I have a Boley Lienen lathe similar to that one without the friction drive and the quality is superb.  I personally like the addition of friction drive that allows delicate control of the speed.  This is great for checking out of truth shafts etc.  My own lathe doesn't have the friction drive, it has an excellent motor with delicate speed control which gives the same effect as friction drive.

If it is in good condition and you can buy it............don't miss the opportunity!

If you purchase the likes of a Boley lathe, there is always a chance that to will get drawn into collecting all the various accessories for it and this can be fun but very expensive.

Edited by Geo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
    • Hi.  I would like to take issue here regarding battery driven , watches, clocks,etc. I will and do repair these clocks in fact I have sever al in my collection as well as the regular mechanical ones. I have one on my mantle piece over 60 years old tha belonged to my wife’s Aunt,  long gone Iam afraid and it has been cleaned etc and never missed a beat and is accurate. Every one has their preduices as regards Electrical /electronic Horology but I regard it as part of the progress time line of the art of Horology and to be treated as such. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution it evolved.  Two cavemen knocking rocks together and a shard broke off , looking at it he worked out if it was stuck on the end of a stick he would have a spear. Likewise his pal seeing what he was up to picked up a piece  and did the same, now that’s evolution. Some clockmaker decided to build a clock that ran with a battery and no spring to wind up and break, progress and both the mechanical and battery driven clocks evolved, the battery ones got better to the point that if it broke you changed the complete unit. Likewise watches did the same but both can be repaired by people who approach Horology with an open mind without preduice.  We all have our likes and dislikes bu I for one would never dismiss any technology because I don’t like it.   The mobile phone is a good example of modern technology at work as is the automotive industry. There buttons and switches in my car I don’t use because to me they are not nesessary but I still drive the car.
    • I haven't gone through all the reading of what it might be or not. The first thing I would do if nothing obvious stands out is replace the mainspring, you have to start at the source of the power. Nine times out of ten that is the problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...