Jump to content

STP 1-11 and ETA 2824 parts compatibility question


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a Zodiac Sea Wolf (new release) powered by a STP 1-11 movement. Watch runs great but I had a small incident while setting the time (slipped from my hands and fell on the countertop about 4-6 inches below ). Watch still ran fine but the stem was bent a little.

 

Before it broke while operating it, I decided to remove it from the movement; it was partially broken and snapped in two in my hands once removed.

 

I took precautions to remove it like a ETA 2824 stem (position #3-time setting mode). However, I have an uncut 2824 stem here in my spare parts and tried to insert it inside the watch movement to repair it myself. It did fit nicely and I was able to handwind the watch, change the date and set the time, but the watch stays in "hacked mode" and the balance wheel won't run.

 

I did take it to my watch guy this morning so he can have a look (it was his first STP 1-11 he ever saw). He'll order the right parts for it and fix it.

 

I wonder what could be the reason for the watch to stop running after the stem was removed and reinserted (2824 stem looked like a perfect fit when looked at with magnification compared to the STP 1-11)? It still ran good after the small drop. I just hope I did not mess up the keyless works with my small experiment...

 

I'll keep you informed of the outcome.

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Seb

 

Envoyé de mon Nexus 5X en utilisant Tapatalk

 

Envoyé de mon Nexus 5X en utilisant Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned, the STP 1-11 is a new movement, so no surprise there's no much information about it. I vaguely recall to have read that they re-used an ETA balance complete. The manufacturer may not even be organized to provide spare parts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you look at the STP it is virtually a clone of the ETA as can be seen on the tech drawing

 

 

STP1-11_Technical_Package_complete.pdf

there could be subtle size differences though, I would look at the stop lever though as it could have slipped

Edited by Danh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Some news.

 

Watch is still with my watch guy.

 

He checked under a loupe a 2824 stem as a replacement for the STP one. Even if they look similar, he still preferred to order a real STP one.

 

As I expected, he has no parts in hand for this movement and will need to order everything, making a rather routine repair job a 2-3 week thing!

 

Thanks!

 

Seb

 

Envoyé de mon Nexus 5X en utilisant Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

Just a quick update.

The watch was ready last week; stem was changed and keyless works resetted. Cost, 60$ CAD, pretty good for me. Even took a bit of time to regulate it for me, the watch runs an amazing +1s/day after a week.

Everything feels nice and smooth when operating the crown but when adjusting the time, there is a slight "loose" feeling where the hands don't move instantly when turning the crown, maybe 0.5mm of play. I'm okay with this since I might have damaged something when it broke on me and no extra parts were changed.

Cheers,

Seb

Envoyé de mon Nexus 5X en utilisant Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See, what has happen is a normal consequece of the reducing the hammer size and changing it's shape by the removing metal from it. But here the hammer is adjustable and just adjustment is needed to correct, and this is what You have done. There is a rule for the adjustment and it is that the hammer must lay firmly on the seconds counter heart and there should be a litle free play in the same time of the minutes counter heart/hammer which alows counter movement of about 0.5 min on the small dial hand (+/- 0.25). Of course, there is no way to make one hammer to delay from the other, as they are one single part. What has changed too is the slope of the hammer head and thus the orientation of the heart has changed, and thus the switching finger position. This led to need of the finger position correction. The rule here is that switching of the minute counter has to start when the seconds counter hand is on '59'. Of course, the seconds hand must be positioned as so the resetting is at '0' exactly. If switching is earlier than 59, there will be no problem, but it will be wrong as reading can be not correct. If the switching starts later, the problems that You described can happen.
    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
×
×
  • Create New...