Jump to content

Has anyone worked on a seiko 619-7071 case?


jnash

Recommended Posts

Have a weird one here. 

I'm sure im missing something as the glass does not fit.

I think im missing a crystal gasket but even the inner ring seems loose.  any one have any pics of the breakdown of the case or a manual? thanks in advice

it was together when i took it apart, but im thinking glue was involved to bodge it 

Thanks in advance!

J

IMG_20170529_173143.thumb.jpg.aadc378a58a71ffaf2ce4acb39a3f85a.jpg

IMG_20170529_173156.thumb.jpg.bed6c039f4a43ebf2e96f0cd0205346b.jpg

IMG_20170529_173244.thumb.jpg.0410b6159f0b3fce0a4ca99e00d30904.jpg

 

IMG_20170529_173904.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it rotate. Is there any small gears on the bezel. If so there should be a gear on the stem to. And maybe you are missing the thin spring that should sit over the inner bezel. A thin wavy washerlike spring. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, I've done 100s of Seiko's , this is a fixed inner bezel. Just wired pi's online don't really help and you can see with all of them that there is what looks like a gap !

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. You have to remove the bezel to gain access to the crystal. Then you press the crystal out and the chapter ring will drop out. The crystal hold the chapter ring in. Check out the Seiko Watch forum at thewatchsite.com or google Seiko / citizen watch forum. Here you can download the Seiko casing guides


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done all of that, the problem is that everything is loose, I think something here is missing suck as a glass gasket etc?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk



Casing guide is your friend. Will show exploded view of case with all parts and gaskets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There must be some sort of crystal gasket? Looked at jules borel and the gasket is a EC3340B04. That is in lots of seiko models. http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=io]H[DeEX

Other then that i see no thing that is missing. http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=SEK+CS%236139-7071&submit=Search

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you however as you can see, the seiko in question is in fact a chronograph (2 buttons , one crown) with a 6139 movement, therefore caliber 6139 and the case number is 7071.

It would be great to find a guide for it to put my mind at ease! - i have never had a issue with a seiko before!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,  I have a 6139-6002 which has chrono buttons and the case data shows F2-Screw2 for 6139-600 so I suspect your case is 707(1).  This then has case data as F3-Screw3.  

The F3 is the data for the glass fitting only (see page 13 on doc) and the Screw3 is the case assembly with all parts.  

My 6139 has chrono buttons but the case info fits so I can only assume that the chrono buttons do not affect the case assembly as such and that the extra digit brings in the chrono or other form of the basic case.

Hope this helps a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...