Jump to content

Has anyone worked on a seiko 619-7071 case?


jnash

Recommended Posts

Have a weird one here. 

I'm sure im missing something as the glass does not fit.

I think im missing a crystal gasket but even the inner ring seems loose.  any one have any pics of the breakdown of the case or a manual? thanks in advice

it was together when i took it apart, but im thinking glue was involved to bodge it 

Thanks in advance!

J

IMG_20170529_173143.thumb.jpg.aadc378a58a71ffaf2ce4acb39a3f85a.jpg

IMG_20170529_173156.thumb.jpg.bed6c039f4a43ebf2e96f0cd0205346b.jpg

IMG_20170529_173244.thumb.jpg.0410b6159f0b3fce0a4ca99e00d30904.jpg

 

IMG_20170529_173904.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it rotate. Is there any small gears on the bezel. If so there should be a gear on the stem to. And maybe you are missing the thin spring that should sit over the inner bezel. A thin wavy washerlike spring. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, I've done 100s of Seiko's , this is a fixed inner bezel. Just wired pi's online don't really help and you can see with all of them that there is what looks like a gap !

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. You have to remove the bezel to gain access to the crystal. Then you press the crystal out and the chapter ring will drop out. The crystal hold the chapter ring in. Check out the Seiko Watch forum at thewatchsite.com or google Seiko / citizen watch forum. Here you can download the Seiko casing guides


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done all of that, the problem is that everything is loose, I think something here is missing suck as a glass gasket etc?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk



Casing guide is your friend. Will show exploded view of case with all parts and gaskets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There must be some sort of crystal gasket? Looked at jules borel and the gasket is a EC3340B04. That is in lots of seiko models. http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=io]H[DeEX

Other then that i see no thing that is missing. http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=SEK+CS%236139-7071&submit=Search

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you however as you can see, the seiko in question is in fact a chronograph (2 buttons , one crown) with a 6139 movement, therefore caliber 6139 and the case number is 7071.

It would be great to find a guide for it to put my mind at ease! - i have never had a issue with a seiko before!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,  I have a 6139-6002 which has chrono buttons and the case data shows F2-Screw2 for 6139-600 so I suspect your case is 707(1).  This then has case data as F3-Screw3.  

The F3 is the data for the glass fitting only (see page 13 on doc) and the Screw3 is the case assembly with all parts.  

My 6139 has chrono buttons but the case info fits so I can only assume that the chrono buttons do not affect the case assembly as such and that the extra digit brings in the chrono or other form of the basic case.

Hope this helps a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...