Jump to content

Omega 1342 trimmer.


Recommended Posts

Hello, everyone,

I have an Omega 1342 watch that I need to adjust the time keeping ability of, using the 

small internal trimmer.

The watch gains about 2 to 3 seconds per week, so I need to know which way the trimmer needs to be adjusted.

Clockwise, or anti clockwise?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is almost like a chronometer 2-3 sec a week that is 1,5 minutes a year. I would probably leave hat as is . Adjusting 1342 trimmer is tricky as not just left or right. If you turn to much it could go over to - or + 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking this was such a strange complaint until I realised we weren't talking about a mechanical calibre, but an early quartz, and I'm not exactly sure what the expectation should be with such a movement. I will say many people wear mechanical watches that are much much less accurate than that and don't consider it a problem, though. My Seiko for example, according to my timer should gain something like 15 seconds a day, but in reality, I never notice any inaccuracy. 

I remember reading about quartz trimmers in a horology book before. if I remember correctly the results of adjusting it are completely unpredictable, a small nudge one way might add a lot of time, a little time, lose a little time or lose a lot of time, what ever way you turn it. I think you can monitor the effects through oscilloscope somehow, but trial and error would be your only way in all likely-hood. 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this job you need a quartz analyzer. The watch should gain 0-15 sec per month not week. When you get an analyzer you can easily adjust a trimmer. I like to adjust them to 2 sec per month if I can.

When adjusting it is like adjusting the beat error in a mechanical watch you have to center it just right or it goes too positive or too negative either way you turn it.

Try to buy the Witschi Tech Handy Two. I have learned that servicing Quartz watches you can't go without one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That machine is around £2,000. I'm not sure it's a given that everyone should have one.:wacko:



If you want to service Omega's you have to have one by Omega standard. If you don't know how to read your rate, consumption and coil resistance you shouldn't be servicing ETA's and up. Especially trimmer watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see the use for trimmer watches, the necessity, even.

I was just trying to point out the fact that it is £2k (and also really rather large) shouldn't be taken for granted. 

Edited by Ishima
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose when considering a quartz movement we are trying to obtain perfection but in reality it's a nonsense. Unless you're engaged in some type of profession that requires complete accuracy such as " Global Navigation" 2 seconds a week or even 20 seconds a week or even per day, is of little consequence to the average person.
I think my old 1984 Omega 1430 gains or loses 5 seconds a week I can't remember. I wouldn't even consider having any adjustments made to it.
I would leave well alone !
Also as Ishima makes reference too " according to my timer should gain something like 15 seconds a day but in reality, I never notice any inaccuracy " Due to variables with a mechanical movement, may even prove to be more accurate than a quartz movement, over an extended period of time, due to the consistent nature of the quartz movement with regards to time gained or lost. In some cases anyway. Now there's a thought.

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My "thanks" to everyone that contributed to my question about adjusting the Omega 1342 trimmer.

For me, the Witschi timer is but a dream.

So it will have to be a case of small adjustments, lots of patience and making notes.

Regards.

Len.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Len33 said:

So it will have to be a case of small adjustments, lots of patience and making notes.

I wish you well Len.  I believe the trimmer can regulates +/- 1.2 seconds per day, please don't go mad in the process of seeking perfection! :unsure:

Edited by Geo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, Rogart63!

I don't know the answer to that.

All I do know, is that it is an 'in house' Omega movement and no other ETA movement will fit the case.

Out of interest, what difference would it make if the Omega 1342 is/was thermocompensated?

Regards.

Len.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I recognize myself all too well. It takes a lot of experience and discipline to recognize when it's time to cancel and come back at a later time. Very well said! We should have a forum dedicated to this topic as it is critical to achieve success when working on watches. It's a lot more important than most other things related to watch repair. And yes, just a short break can make a world of difference!
    • Hello Wai and welcome to the forum. A little information to enlighten you a little more TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf
    • I am certainly not the first one who happen to ruin the chronograph center-wheel of a Seiko 6139B. The internet, when you search for it, is littered with stories, even here on WRT there are some. One of the problems is that the service manual of the 6139A is readily available on the net, not so with the service manual of the 6139B. On top, reading other forums & stories, there are people who claim that there is hardly any difference between the 6139A and the 6139B movement, so the 6139A service manual will suffice. However, one of the crucial differences is the design of the chronograph center-wheel. Also the Seiko reference numbers are different. For the 6139A, the reference number for the chronograph center-wheel is 888610 and for the 6139B: 888611 or 888612, depending on which manual you are reading (and perhaps there is a difference between these two wheel too !??) To lubricated the 6139A chronograph center-wheel, the following graphic picture in the 6139A service manual is given; One has to press down the sprocket and oil it. Unaware of the difference in chrono center-wheel design, I pressed down on the sprocket, but there was no movement. Perhaps not understanding or interpreting the drawing correctly, I pressed with the tweezers on the 4th wheel. This caused the 4th wheel, which turned out to be a press fit to the sprocket by the 6139B, to strip off the sprocket. Thereby me joining the line of all the others, who tried this before and are now searching for "how to fix" this misfortune. In an older thread on WRT, member @ricardopalamino place a picture in which he shows the difference in center-wheel design between the 6139A and the 6139B. To the left the 6139B and to the right the 6139A. As can be seen on the left center-wheel, the 4th wheel is pressed onto a sprocket. Pressing down on it, as shown in the 6139A service manual, gives a ruinous result. People did several attempts to repair the damage, but so far, I haven't found a success story. Here is one of the attempts; Reading what already has been tried, I tried a different approach ..... but sadly failed too. Nevertheless, I'll show what I've done; perhaps somebody may fine-tune or expand on the idea and has success? In my staking set was an anvil with a 4.5mm hole, exact the size needed to fit the chrono center-wheel "up-side-down". The distance between the clutch parts and the 4th wheel was 0.25mm. To support the 4th wheel as close as possible up to its center, I used feeler gauge blades, on one side a 0.25mm blade, and on the other side a combination of 0.15mm + 0.10mm blades. This allowed me to tap the sprocket back onto the 4th wheel ...... The thickness of 0.25 blades doesn't prevent some "spring" action, and so my 4th wheel was slightly deformed. The re-attachment seemed successful, but when trying to true the wheel, the connection failed again 😭 Currently there is a NOS 6139B chronograph center-wheel on eBay. Last Sunday the price was €150, on Monday the seller increased the price to €165 !!         Prevention is better than the cure and I do hope that anyone in the future, searching for a 6139 manual, with read my "Warning". As for my Seiko, I'm not going to invest €165 for one part and since the rest is pretty good, I will sell the watch for "parts or repair" 😞  
    • Off the top of my head I can't remember which was which, but one of the hands had the clutch with the very fine radial teeth as described above, the other had a flat disc with two tiny 'pins', there was what looked like the remains of something black smeared on the opposite face, maybe the remains of rotted rubber? When I can get some good pictures of both I will post
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...