Jump to content

Watch Parts: Eu Commission Final Ruling - Announced 29 July 2014

Mark
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
Posted

Source: https://www.cousinsuk.com/page/news

Commission closes its investigation into the refusal by several manufacturers of prestige/luxury

watches to supply spare parts to independent repairers.

The European Commission has closed its antitrust investigation in the sectors of the supply of spare

parts and the provision of repair and maintenance services for luxury/prestige watches in several

member states (notably France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK).

The investigation concerned watches which are typically worth repairing and maintaining (in that

regard, the Commission focused on watches sold above a certain retail price). The Commission

investigated, further to a complaint by the European Confederation of Watch and Clock Repairers'

Association ("CEAHR"), whether the discontinuance of the supplies of spare parts by prestige watch

manufacturers to independent watch repairers (i.e. repairers that do not belong to their respective

official networks for repair and maintenance services) may constitute an infringement of EU

competition rules on restrictive agreements and abuse of a dominant position (Articles 101 and 102 of

the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, respectively). Following a comprehensive investigation, the

Commission has concluded that there is limited likelihood of finding such an infringement in the

present case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RosscoInOshawa WRT Addict

RosscoInOshawa

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure if I'm just being naive but is this a way of the larger prestige manufacturer's stopping amateur watch repairers who may not know what they are doing (me for instance) from buying parts and attempting repair of a watch, only to have it fail and then they blame the manufacturer and perhaps tarnish their reputation?  Or just corporate greed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobm12 Distinguished Member

bobm12

Posted
Posted

I believe it is a way to not just do that, but to have all distributors and independent watchmakers (and of course hobbyists like me) on a leach or worst. Total Swiss-watch-world dominance scheme! I wonder what the Asian market will do. Maybe the Swiss are shooting themselves in the foot (long term).

 

Something to think about:

 

Existing clone Chinese made ETA/Unitas movements 1 to 1 swappable.

Nice looking and dependable Japanese name brands.

Name brand Cloning market (for those that don't care)...

 

Maybe I'm stating the already known pattern here, but the reality is they are not the only ones out there! It is a pity they have assumed that position that negates their design for serviceability and thus an opportunity for everyone to be able to do so for profit or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted

Well, we've mentioned this before on the forum. I'll repeat my own view that two things will happen:

 

(1) The market for s/h "spares or repair" watches will blossom (2) non-Swatch Swiss watch movement firms, and Asian firms, will also blossom.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, we've mentioned this before on the forum. I'll repeat my own view that two things will happen:

(1) The market for s/h "spares or repair" watches will blossom (2) non-Swatch Swiss watch movement firms, and Asian firms, will also blossom.

Very true.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RosscoInOshawa WRT Addict

RosscoInOshawa

Posted
Posted (edited)

Well, we've mentioned this before on the forum. I'll repeat my own view that two things will happen:

 

(1) The market for s/h "spares or repair" watches will blossom (2) non-Swatch Swiss watch movement firms, and Asian firms, will also blossom.

Will, bear with me as I'm not familiar with this issue but you're saying the market for buying and selling of "spare parts" watches and/or the sale of replacement movements will blossom?

 

I haven't had to buy any spare watch parts yet, or price them, but judging solely on the inflated cost of Swiss made tools so far, is the same likely to be true, inflated pricing on Swiss made watch parts or as they are trying to do, block the sale entirely?  

 

That's sad, it IS corporate greed then.

Edited by RosscoInOshawa
Link to comment
Share on other sites
clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted (edited)

In this months bhi journal (August) a letter has been published by myself "has the industry hit a destruct button"  

The BHI CEO Dudley Giles also relied.

To summarise his reply. The BHI is not a trade association but the BHI board of directors is keenly aware that the membership wishes to know where they stand. The conclusion is that the BHI feels honour bound to move in step with "our european colleagues" He also reminds members of the failed attempt by CEAHR several years ago to address the imposition of anti-competitive & restrictive practices.

I take it from this that nothing will happen and the only change will be is in time any future customers will gradually move away from Swiss watches as the bad news spreads.

Edited by clockboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Distinguished Member

Mark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's the watch owners who will ultimately be screwed as 'choice' is removed from the equation when deciding on who to send their repairs to. The watch houses will be able to charge whatever they damn well like and the customer can take it or leave it.

Watch repairers on the other hand will always have work to do, so will not lose out much.

I feel for the watch owners.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon
      Introducing myself

      By Jon · Posted

      Hi there  
    • Jon
      Movement inserted from crytal side

      By Jon · Posted

      Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • JohnR725
      Main spring

      By JohnR725 · Posted

      It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Zedster
      Movement inserted from crytal side

      By Zedster · Posted

      Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • Jon
      Main spring

      By Jon · Posted

      I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...