Jump to content

Antique Lathe -- thoughts?


PWR

Recommended Posts

 

My first thought is that it is a wheel cutter but I do not see a indexing plate. A antique for sure and eBay will be best for selling it. 

This is a Topping Tool.

The cutters are split and shaped in such a way that they self index to the next tooth by screw action.  The initial cutting of the teeth are usually made on on a lathe fitted with an index plate.  Once all the teeth are cut, the wheel is transferred to this "Topping Tool" for shaping the tops of the teeth.

PWR if I was you I'd sell it in a specialist auction or on eBay.  Going by the condition of the tool, you should get upwards of £1000.

Edited by Geo
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't want to sell it then keep it. Things like this can only increases in value.

 

You've still got a couple of years to catch up on me..............now what were we talking about???

The stroke I had didn't help. Geo I thought I was the oldest on here. :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Never really known any watchmaker to actually use these things... they usually end up sat in a cabinet -bought by non-watchmakers- as an ornament because they are shiny or look 'interesting'..

 

 

Actually my grandfather did use this!!!!   Of course that was 1930s into the 1950's......but there is no rust and little dust so perhaps my Dad did use it when I wasn't looking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually my grandfather did use this!!!!   Of course that was 1930s into the 1950's......but there is no rust and little dust so perhaps my Dad did use it when I wasn't looking!

In the past, making new parts was quite normal and taught in schools. Now even watchmakers with an high reputation when confronted with the need of turning an cutting a wheel won't do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

That looks like a ROUNDING UP TOOL.  Before modern motorized  high precision machinery was available to small shops, gear teeth would be cut and would not be concentric with the center hole of the gear. I suspect that watch repair shops did not even have electricity in those days, let alone machinery powered by motors. The cutters are actually rotary files with an offset guide to force the gear teeth into the cutter. The process is  similar to the way gear hobs cut gears  today. The gear hob cutter has the teeth positioned on a helix and the cutter forces its way through the gear blank with a threading action. Due to the way a hob cuts, indexing the gear blank to cut each tooth individually is not necessary.  

The cutters on a Rounding Up Tool  work the same way. A watch gear could actually have the teeth rough cut by hand with a saw and hand file  and then formed to the final shape with a  Rounding Up Tool. 

Here is a video of the tool in action:

https://youtu.be/Pej-FQBR1ss

david

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is.
    • I recently bought this but not on ebay. I figured if I want something Japanese I better check Japanese auction sites since these don't seem to pop up on ebay. I paid 83 € plus shipping & taxes. I think it was pretty reasonable for a complete set in good condition.
    • Did you take the friction pinion off the large driving wheel and grease it? Although, now that I think about it, that shouldn't have any effect on the free running of the train if the friction pinion isn't interacting withe minute wheel/setting wheel...
    • I did in fact use Rodico to get the spring into general position and "hold" it there while I used a fine oiler to make subtle positional adjustments.
    • The two measurements of particular importance wound be the height and the strength,  the length would obviously correspond with the increase/reduction of half mm of barrel diameter. There is a big difference in price considering that the more expensive one is the shortest. The longer one might be ok ? But then it is taking up more room in the barrel, might it effect the unwinding ? I wouldn't have thought so for just that small amount.  Ideally a pro might reduce the longer one to suit. But there is some information that might help, do you have the one that was fitted to measure up, though not necessarily the right one.
×
×
  • Create New...