Jump to content

ISA 8172: Second, hour, minute hands do not advance

SudoHalt
 Share

Recommended Posts

SudoHalt Member

SudoHalt

Posted
Posted

Hello,

My father has a watch which has the ISA 8172 Quartz Movement inside. Its battery was dead, so I have bought a brand new battery as a replacement.

To my surprise, the new battery did not seem to work; the second hand did not advance, which also prevented the minute and hour hands from moving. Most of the time, the second hand would be completely idle, whereas sometimes it will periodically shake in its place like the second hand of a clock with a near-dead battery. At very rare occasions, the second hand works for a few minutes at most. As a side note, the second hand on this watch is in a subdial.

To prove to myself that it's not a battery problem, I tried the chronograph function which worked flawlessly. The central second hand of the chronograph works just fine and the chronograph's minutes subdial has no problems. I have tested the same battery on other watches too.

My last resort was to think of any clear obstacle which could prevent the second hand from moving. I decided to disassemble the watch so as to remove the dial which may be an obstacle. Basically, I left the watch movement bare, putting back on only the watch's second hand and the hour hand. Leaving it for a few days, I did not notice any sign of functionality.

Is there anything I can do to fix this problem or should I just toss it away for a replacement movement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnR725 Distinguished Member

JohnR725

Posted
Posted

troubleshooting quartz watches requires more than just visually examining things. You need electrical test equipment to verify that the coil is good and the circuit is working. Chronographs become more complicated considerably more circuitry more coils just more things to go wrong. This is where having a really good tech sheet for servicing is nice unfortunately totally lacking for this watch. the lack of proper servicing information indicates that they don't expect anyone to service their watch. Replacing the movement would be the best option.

http://www.isaswiss.com/public/ftp/mouvements_docs/technique/8172-220.pdf

 

https://mspf.azylis.net:50002/GED/SITEWEB-technical datasheet/DATASHEET 8172/8172_USER-MANUAL.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neileg WRT Addict

Neileg

Posted
Posted

A half decent quartz watch tester should have a Line Free function. This spins up the movement with a magnet and will often free up the mechanism from sticky lube or light corrosion. This may be all you need. About 30GBP on eBay

Cheers, Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VWatchie
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By VWatchie · Posted

      That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • Michael1962
      I'm going to be setting up a decent little workshop here at home.

      By Michael1962 · Posted

      I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • nickelsilver
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • Neverenoughwatches
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • VWatchie
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By VWatchie · Posted

      That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...