Jump to content

Handwind Seiko Cronos cal.54


Recommended Posts

Seiko watches have been a personal favorite of mine because of the quality of the materials used and also the quality of the design.

I recently purchased a hand-wind Seiko Cronos which was advertised as non-running and I thought I'd share my experience with it.

As received, the watch was in decent cosmetic condition but not running.

1.thumb.jpg.dc2ccf59d3e7f79984cb7e9322a57d96.jpg

Caseback is in decent shape and the case itself seems to be pretty much unworn. Its Gold-plated but no indication of the thickness. Serial is the 7 digit type used in the 60s so this would be April '61?

2.thumb.jpg.56ef447f592b697f87564885dc60a9ff.jpg

I popped the front bezel off as the movement comes out the front, you can see some damage to the dial where the hands have grazed the dial.

3.thumb.jpg.fc8e8092d211a645297a4b7e94a47e4c.jpg

Another pic of the damaged area. Its a shame as the dial is in good condition otherwise.

4.thumb.jpg.6861a55eae3a3e96dad5daf8647c93dd.jpg

The Seiko calibre 54. These came in 54A, 54B and 54C.. not to sure which one this is as there's not much info about these movements. Decent looking and 23 jewels for a handwind is pretty awesome. A full bridge for the balance-wheel no less...just like Rolex! One of the case screws is missing.

5.thumb.jpg.72e5a58bb4da95bc2dde9ea62f41c03e.jpg

The dial side of the movement with the dial removed... not as pretty as the other side, cap jewels present but in a simpler design.

8.thumb.jpg.60a074560d88654df424325366035c2f.jpg

With the ratchet-wheel, balance-wheel and pallet-fork removed.. here we see the first sign of a problem. The barrel arbor hole has been 'massaged' to reduce barrel endshake.

11.thumb.jpg.6526864e66af80eab11d67b856d16870.jpg

The underside of the barrel-bridge.. negligible end-shake on the barrel so it will go back in as it is.

12.thumb.jpg.66ecaf0f37fb2737caaaa64f1e09a1fc.jpg

Some wheels...pretty similar to a lot of other Seiko movements.

13.thumb.jpg.3fbf5f9046a6f2529ee5ea06a8f66e5c.jpg

Dial-side dismantled.. It is at this point I realised that Seiko was not above playing the 'jewel' game.

14.thumb.jpg.4021c60793da452c04ff69a36da0504e.jpg

In the picture below, you can see that the jewel for the pallet fork has an oil 'sink' . In these jewels the endshake is controlled by the inner flat surface, rather than cap jewel which makes the cap jewel superflous. Compare this to the escape wheel jewel where the jewel is domed on the outside and the oil sits in the gap between the curved jewel and the cap jewel. Here the cap jewel serves to ensure minimal friction as the point of the pivot rides on the cap-jewel whereas in normal uncapped settings the pivot's 'shoulder' hits the flat inner surface of the jewel. I'm not sure if Seiko did this to raise the jewel count, pallet-fork pivots are not usually oiled so it could be that having cap jewels here MAY reduce friction in this case as endshake is more controlled.

15.thumb.jpg.55183b263cecf112ccbca2b807374f85.jpg

Below we see the other side of these jewels, the escape wheel jewel is the one with a flat side.

15a.thumb.jpg.5ae35207172e0f7d0baaa77018333432.jpg

Mainspring looks good.

16.thumb.jpg.68243aa9d96e8e6d271e1292916e4880.jpg

Ditto the barrel

17.thumb.jpg.43b1979286f080d93efb046b1302b942.jpg

The cap jewels have been cleaned, The double jewelled one goes back in one position only as the cutouts match the holes in the dial where you check the pallet/escape-wheel engagement.

18a.thumb.jpg.6374547894d39438f8c5a8c740c7e668.jpg

Diafix settings with the spring in the open position and cap-jewels about to be removed...

19.thumb.jpg.ed319d7c4d235371dea8501a50474423.jpg

Dirty jewels..

20.jpg.703fba88b2386a807bd54a3ab44fd61b.jpg

And here we see the bottom of the train bridge. again we see another jewel which does not require a 'cap'. The fourth-wheel (seconds) jewel is flat on this side and has the oil-sink on the other. This wheel needs to be oiled and hence the cap-jewel is just a 'dustcap'.

21.thumb.jpg.ae218b48764fa029ebb1dcb0913f0250.jpg

view of the oil-sink and 'proper' capped jewels for the escape and third wheel.

22.thumb.jpg.0b947c053491df78e27fea61f490f7cc.jpg

All cleaned up and oiled. Fitting the diafix jewels went smoothly enough.. sometimes they cause problems but not today!

24.thumb.jpg.f0a050c19fd31d31b30e298431f28012.jpg

Train bridge installed and checked for smooth runnig.. all good but.........

25.thumb.jpg.18733be49161380c2e179a7cc2591c1f.jpg

The diafix springs were all over the place so I adjusted how they were aligned.. I think it looks a bit better now! (the upper left spring looks like it has one leg out of the groove but its actually OK).

26.thumb.jpg.ed37326f498ceaa420b3a64c4e057759.jpg

Everything running smoothly.

27.thumb.jpg.212c70aba91097d686adb37fe23f4a1b.jpg

Overall it was a nice movement to work on but the most difficult part about working on these watches is getting the clearance of the hands correct. I had to remove the bezel twice before it ran without hands snagging on each other and I believe that it wouldn't take much to get them out of alignment.

This movement was used as the basis for some early Grand Seiko watches and while I haven't timed it, it has been running well for the last few days. I really think that the 2 cap jewels I mentioned above are unnecessary and it would have been better to jewel the barrel arbor but even with 21 functional jewels it still is a nice running watch!

Hope you enjoyed reading about this as much as I enjoyed working on it!

 

Anilv

 

Ps.. while outwardly clean, the initial rinse in lighter fluid showed how much of dirt was in the movement. Here the balance and pallet fork was removed, the mainspring given a few turns and it was left to unwind in the fluid. I find that this helps clean the pivots but you have to prevent the wheels from turning (I used a sliver of pegwood) until the movement is submerged in the lighter fluid otherwise the wheels spin too fast and could wear the pivots unnecessarily.

10.jpg

 

23.jpg

Edited by anilv
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice write-up for an interesting movement.

Even though those Diafix springs can be a real headache (it gave me shivers just seeing them in the pictures), that appears to be a high quality Seiko movement.  I especially like Seiko's use of balance bridges in their better movements; they fly a bit under the radar but put together a solid watch.

Great tip regarding unwinding the watch in fluid.  I can see how that would be helpful in both cleaning the pivots and jewel bearings. :)

Nice work and thanks for sharing!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have one with a broken Setting lever spring (I used your picture below to indicate the part) and would like to look up the part number and see I can find a new one, so looking for the parts list. Any suggestions welcome!

288sbo4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @AndyGSi    Lucky Mr pilk posted this relevant page from good Dr ranfft's database. Cal 620  &  Cal 630  beat 19800 per hour, so they share  exact same escapement.  Cal 625   &   Cal 635      beat 21600 per hour, they both share same exact escapement .  All are listed as  members of one family, and staff  U2920 fits all, regardless of the beat or complications.  Cal 620 was developed before other cals listed there, so in the world of Omega and Zenith, cal 620 is called the base cal for this family. No gear of 19800 and 21600 beaters, in gear trains interchange. Roller tables and impulse jewels can be the same providing  lift angles be.  So even if a group of members in a family beat different, same ole U2920 fits all. Notice ,  Dr ranfft calls 620, 625, 630 and 635  a family, not " completely independent movements " . Rgds
    • Mild collector, mostly Omega dive watches.  My son and I recently finished a week long watchmaking class with AWCI (fantastic experience with unbelievably skilled watchmakers.  We learned a ton which only scratched the surface   So NEXT WE PRACTICE PRACTICE no prctice.  Have a few movements already, especially the one we learned on.  Can’t wait to get my new glasses and start rolling.  I’m doing this for fun, but my son (23) is exploring it as a career.  And wants to go to one of the big schools like Seattle   (Per recommendation)    In any case, time to get to reading the wealth of wisdom here! we are in the north Atlanta/Roswell area  Note that I also have a vehicle addiction (land rovers, bmw, bronco), but I’m starting that culling to fund more tweezers and epilame   😉 David  
    • So i've been trying to source a bellmatic dial for some time that's compatible with the bellmatic i own and theres a handful on ebay but none appear to be compatible. Ebay japan doesn't even let me look at listings but i've heard of various ebay like sites in japan where users sell things and it seems like seiko parts like that would be a lot easier to find in japan. I'm not looking for a watch parts specific place but just a place where people in japan would sell watches to each other and parts and that sort of thing among whatever else they want to sell. the phillipines and thailand also seem to be a pretty rich place to find seiko parts so if there's a market in those places i could search too that anybody knows of that might work also. I've heard of a few over the years but i can't remember the names of any of them. Any help would be appreciated.
    • Thanks! You learn something new every day. I wasn't sure about the difference between a beat and an oscillation. So good to know. 2 beats = 1 oscillation.  I sure will. It's going to be interesting. So far I've turned the balance near 300° before letting it go and on a really healthy balance it has been swinging for about 70-90 seconds in the horizontal positions. Anyway, when doing the test, I'll only swing it 180°. I will be surprised to see it swing for only 25 seconds or less, but we shall see. That could be because I've never tried to count oscillations and only assumed it would be impossible or difficult. Anyway, let's see when I get a chance, hopefully in a month or so as I'm still on vacation and far, very far, from a workbench. Here's Kalle Slaap doing the kind of test that I do (start at 12:30). An interesting observation is that when Kalle starts the balance towards the end of the video at 14:40, it oscillates for about 50 seconds before the video ends. It is difficult to judge whether the balance swings more than 180° at the start, but it looks like it could be close to 180°.  
    • Thanks for the comments I ‘ll pay attention to both points. 
×
×
  • Create New...