Jump to content

Handwind Seiko Cronos cal.54

anilv
 Share

Recommended Posts

anilv Distinguished Member

anilv

Posted
Posted (edited)

Seiko watches have been a personal favorite of mine because of the quality of the materials used and also the quality of the design.

I recently purchased a hand-wind Seiko Cronos which was advertised as non-running and I thought I'd share my experience with it.

As received, the watch was in decent cosmetic condition but not running.

1.thumb.jpg.dc2ccf59d3e7f79984cb7e9322a57d96.jpg

Caseback is in decent shape and the case itself seems to be pretty much unworn. Its Gold-plated but no indication of the thickness. Serial is the 7 digit type used in the 60s so this would be April '61?

2.thumb.jpg.56ef447f592b697f87564885dc60a9ff.jpg

I popped the front bezel off as the movement comes out the front, you can see some damage to the dial where the hands have grazed the dial.

3.thumb.jpg.fc8e8092d211a645297a4b7e94a47e4c.jpg

Another pic of the damaged area. Its a shame as the dial is in good condition otherwise.

4.thumb.jpg.6861a55eae3a3e96dad5daf8647c93dd.jpg

The Seiko calibre 54. These came in 54A, 54B and 54C.. not to sure which one this is as there's not much info about these movements. Decent looking and 23 jewels for a handwind is pretty awesome. A full bridge for the balance-wheel no less...just like Rolex! One of the case screws is missing.

5.thumb.jpg.72e5a58bb4da95bc2dde9ea62f41c03e.jpg

The dial side of the movement with the dial removed... not as pretty as the other side, cap jewels present but in a simpler design.

8.thumb.jpg.60a074560d88654df424325366035c2f.jpg

With the ratchet-wheel, balance-wheel and pallet-fork removed.. here we see the first sign of a problem. The barrel arbor hole has been 'massaged' to reduce barrel endshake.

11.thumb.jpg.6526864e66af80eab11d67b856d16870.jpg

The underside of the barrel-bridge.. negligible end-shake on the barrel so it will go back in as it is.

12.thumb.jpg.66ecaf0f37fb2737caaaa64f1e09a1fc.jpg

Some wheels...pretty similar to a lot of other Seiko movements.

13.thumb.jpg.3fbf5f9046a6f2529ee5ea06a8f66e5c.jpg

Dial-side dismantled.. It is at this point I realised that Seiko was not above playing the 'jewel' game.

14.thumb.jpg.4021c60793da452c04ff69a36da0504e.jpg

In the picture below, you can see that the jewel for the pallet fork has an oil 'sink' . In these jewels the endshake is controlled by the inner flat surface, rather than cap jewel which makes the cap jewel superflous. Compare this to the escape wheel jewel where the jewel is domed on the outside and the oil sits in the gap between the curved jewel and the cap jewel. Here the cap jewel serves to ensure minimal friction as the point of the pivot rides on the cap-jewel whereas in normal uncapped settings the pivot's 'shoulder' hits the flat inner surface of the jewel. I'm not sure if Seiko did this to raise the jewel count, pallet-fork pivots are not usually oiled so it could be that having cap jewels here MAY reduce friction in this case as endshake is more controlled.

15.thumb.jpg.55183b263cecf112ccbca2b807374f85.jpg

Below we see the other side of these jewels, the escape wheel jewel is the one with a flat side.

15a.thumb.jpg.5ae35207172e0f7d0baaa77018333432.jpg

Mainspring looks good.

16.thumb.jpg.68243aa9d96e8e6d271e1292916e4880.jpg

Ditto the barrel

17.thumb.jpg.43b1979286f080d93efb046b1302b942.jpg

The cap jewels have been cleaned, The double jewelled one goes back in one position only as the cutouts match the holes in the dial where you check the pallet/escape-wheel engagement.

18a.thumb.jpg.6374547894d39438f8c5a8c740c7e668.jpg

Diafix settings with the spring in the open position and cap-jewels about to be removed...

19.thumb.jpg.ed319d7c4d235371dea8501a50474423.jpg

Dirty jewels..

20.jpg.703fba88b2386a807bd54a3ab44fd61b.jpg

And here we see the bottom of the train bridge. again we see another jewel which does not require a 'cap'. The fourth-wheel (seconds) jewel is flat on this side and has the oil-sink on the other. This wheel needs to be oiled and hence the cap-jewel is just a 'dustcap'.

21.thumb.jpg.ae218b48764fa029ebb1dcb0913f0250.jpg

view of the oil-sink and 'proper' capped jewels for the escape and third wheel.

22.thumb.jpg.0b947c053491df78e27fea61f490f7cc.jpg

All cleaned up and oiled. Fitting the diafix jewels went smoothly enough.. sometimes they cause problems but not today!

24.thumb.jpg.f0a050c19fd31d31b30e298431f28012.jpg

Train bridge installed and checked for smooth runnig.. all good but.........

25.thumb.jpg.18733be49161380c2e179a7cc2591c1f.jpg

The diafix springs were all over the place so I adjusted how they were aligned.. I think it looks a bit better now! (the upper left spring looks like it has one leg out of the groove but its actually OK).

26.thumb.jpg.ed37326f498ceaa420b3a64c4e057759.jpg

Everything running smoothly.

27.thumb.jpg.212c70aba91097d686adb37fe23f4a1b.jpg

Overall it was a nice movement to work on but the most difficult part about working on these watches is getting the clearance of the hands correct. I had to remove the bezel twice before it ran without hands snagging on each other and I believe that it wouldn't take much to get them out of alignment.

This movement was used as the basis for some early Grand Seiko watches and while I haven't timed it, it has been running well for the last few days. I really think that the 2 cap jewels I mentioned above are unnecessary and it would have been better to jewel the barrel arbor but even with 21 functional jewels it still is a nice running watch!

Hope you enjoyed reading about this as much as I enjoyed working on it!

 

Anilv

 

Ps.. while outwardly clean, the initial rinse in lighter fluid showed how much of dirt was in the movement. Here the balance and pallet fork was removed, the mainspring given a few turns and it was left to unwind in the fluid. I find that this helps clean the pivots but you have to prevent the wheels from turning (I used a sliver of pegwood) until the movement is submerged in the lighter fluid otherwise the wheels spin too fast and could wear the pivots unnecessarily.

10.jpg

 

23.jpg

Edited by anilv
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RyMoeller Super WRT Addict

RyMoeller

Posted
Posted

Nice write-up for an interesting movement.

Even though those Diafix springs can be a real headache (it gave me shivers just seeing them in the pictures), that appears to be a high quality Seiko movement.  I especially like Seiko's use of balance bridges in their better movements; they fly a bit under the radar but put together a solid watch.

Great tip regarding unwinding the watch in fluid.  I can see how that would be helpful in both cleaning the pivots and jewel bearings. :)

Nice work and thanks for sharing!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
Sven New Member

Sven

Posted
Posted

I have one with a broken Setting lever spring (I used your picture below to indicate the part) and would like to look up the part number and see I can find a new one, so looking for the parts list. Any suggestions welcome!

288sbo4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VWatchie
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By VWatchie · Posted

      That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • Michael1962
      I'm going to be setting up a decent little workshop here at home.

      By Michael1962 · Posted

      I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • nickelsilver
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • Neverenoughwatches
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • VWatchie
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By VWatchie · Posted

      That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...