Jump to content

Transfering the automatic weight bearing from a 6119 to a 6105


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I just fitted a new dial to the Seiko 6105 diver I re-surrected a while back, see this post below.

While it was on my desk, there was one more thing which I wanted to address.

In the pic below you can see the rusted out original 6105 movement.

58f082e06cbd3_6105rust.jpg.6c0919efa8293671c378bb54503e21d1.jpg

The 6119 is basically a drop in replacement for the 6105. Looking at the backside of the movement you can see that the layout of the wheels and bridges are identical. The first thing you would notice is there are more jewels in the 6119 (21) compared to the 6105 (17) which is a good thing in my opinion. A not so visible difference is that on the 6105 the bridge and balance cock are chamfered at the edges compared to the squared-off edges you can see on the 6119. The 6119 is the cased movement in the picture below. The 6105 is on the right.

While the 6119 size matches the 6105, in this instance you will loose the quickset for the day function as the 6119 quicksets by pushing in the crown. For this to work in the 6105 diver you would need a gap between the crown and case. I preferred not to do so. This is another reason the 6106 will not work as the quickset for day works the same as the 6119.

The three small rings at the top of the picture are parts of the bearing assembly from the 6105.

P_20170414_154101_HDR.thumb.jpg.dc6df4e899e76c477eae999ecfe845e9.jpg

Here we see the 6119 movement with its correct autowind bridge.

P_20170414_153758.thumb.jpg.c61d7654cc832a2f61305fb2082944cf.jpg

And here we see the 6119 bridge sans bearing.. The bearing pushes in from behind and is staked to hold it in place.

P_20170414_153623.thumb.jpg.d3550d3ce28d3609e5f127da6d8310cb.jpg

Here the bearing has been fitted into the 6105 bridge and the autowind assembly has been installed back  onto the 6119 movement. The balance cock seems to be a bit different colour but is actually identical to the naked eye.

P_20170414_154926.thumb.jpg.0f7c17239c01af0194c00e58be4acfbe.jpg

The rotor is reinstalled, now all thats needed is to case it up.

P_20170414_155053.thumb.jpg.9bb4ed12cf88890e9f5244a830907c55.jpg

So that's the final chapter on the resurrection of the 6105 diver.

My intent in doing this was to retain as much of the original watch as possible. I realise that what I have done here is sort of like a ' how to counterfeit a Seiko 6105 diver' type of post but to balance this I hope it also raises awareness for those looking to buy a similar watch that a lot of things are possible and to be cautious when buying these watches.

I don't plan to sell this watch as this is probably the closest I can get to a 6105 diver within a price thats acceptable to me, but in the event that I do I will direct the buyer to this site to see for himself what has been done.

Cheers

Anilv

 

Edited by anilv
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is.
×
×
  • Create New...