Jump to content

Transfering the automatic weight bearing from a 6119 to a 6105


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I just fitted a new dial to the Seiko 6105 diver I re-surrected a while back, see this post below.

While it was on my desk, there was one more thing which I wanted to address.

In the pic below you can see the rusted out original 6105 movement.

58f082e06cbd3_6105rust.jpg.6c0919efa8293671c378bb54503e21d1.jpg

The 6119 is basically a drop in replacement for the 6105. Looking at the backside of the movement you can see that the layout of the wheels and bridges are identical. The first thing you would notice is there are more jewels in the 6119 (21) compared to the 6105 (17) which is a good thing in my opinion. A not so visible difference is that on the 6105 the bridge and balance cock are chamfered at the edges compared to the squared-off edges you can see on the 6119. The 6119 is the cased movement in the picture below. The 6105 is on the right.

While the 6119 size matches the 6105, in this instance you will loose the quickset for the day function as the 6119 quicksets by pushing in the crown. For this to work in the 6105 diver you would need a gap between the crown and case. I preferred not to do so. This is another reason the 6106 will not work as the quickset for day works the same as the 6119.

The three small rings at the top of the picture are parts of the bearing assembly from the 6105.

P_20170414_154101_HDR.thumb.jpg.dc6df4e899e76c477eae999ecfe845e9.jpg

Here we see the 6119 movement with its correct autowind bridge.

P_20170414_153758.thumb.jpg.c61d7654cc832a2f61305fb2082944cf.jpg

And here we see the 6119 bridge sans bearing.. The bearing pushes in from behind and is staked to hold it in place.

P_20170414_153623.thumb.jpg.d3550d3ce28d3609e5f127da6d8310cb.jpg

Here the bearing has been fitted into the 6105 bridge and the autowind assembly has been installed back  onto the 6119 movement. The balance cock seems to be a bit different colour but is actually identical to the naked eye.

P_20170414_154926.thumb.jpg.0f7c17239c01af0194c00e58be4acfbe.jpg

The rotor is reinstalled, now all thats needed is to case it up.

P_20170414_155053.thumb.jpg.9bb4ed12cf88890e9f5244a830907c55.jpg

So that's the final chapter on the resurrection of the 6105 diver.

My intent in doing this was to retain as much of the original watch as possible. I realise that what I have done here is sort of like a ' how to counterfeit a Seiko 6105 diver' type of post but to balance this I hope it also raises awareness for those looking to buy a similar watch that a lot of things are possible and to be cautious when buying these watches.

I don't plan to sell this watch as this is probably the closest I can get to a 6105 diver within a price thats acceptable to me, but in the event that I do I will direct the buyer to this site to see for himself what has been done.

Cheers

Anilv

 

Edited by anilv
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...