Jump to content

Major mess with chinese 2813 automatic movement


Recommended Posts

Hello guys, I don't know what happened here. Today I removed the movement from a watch with this 2813 automatic movement, it features second hand hack. I removed the rotor and then I glued a dial in a correct position (it was askew), I removed the feet from the dial and then glued it on the movement with a tiny bit of super glue. I am positive the glue didn't go in any wheel or something. However now this is what happen: The second hand hack is gone, the position for winding is gone too. I can set the hour but when I screw in the crown at the end the setting of the hour engages again and the hands go backward. I tried to remove and refit the stem several times to no avail. Any clue?

Also, the rotor moves freely in one direction and less in another, it kind seems that it's engaging the winding directly.

Edited by chriz74
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like you have dislodged the setting lever.

Unfortunately the solution to this requires removing the dial... which is just one reason why it's not a good idea to glue them on. Assuming this is a calendar movement you will also likely have to remove the date wheel. Watch out for the springs!

The rotor will feel slightly stiff in one direction and free in the other as most of these chinese movements only wind in one direction. As long as the rotor winds the watch under its own weight in one direction then this is normal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, StuartBaker104 said:

Sounds like you have dislodged the setting lever.

Unfortunately the solution to this requires removing the dial... which is just one reason why it's not a good idea to glue them on. Assuming this is a calendar movement you will also likely have to remove the date wheel. Watch out for the springs!

The rotor will feel slightly stiff in one direction and free in the other as most of these chinese movements only wind in one direction. As long as the rotor winds the watch under its own weight in one direction then this is normal.

 

I detached the dial, a tiny screw fell off from under it. 

 

Edcqck9.jpg?2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me putting the hacking lever back in the correct position was a bit hard. As i remember there is enough room to put it back in the wrong order. I had to understand how it works and then it was all clear how to reassemble. 

The movement is meant to be simple so the plate holding the hacking lever has multiple roles.

You should also reassemble the setting mechanism with the stem in place.

Keep trying! ;)

Edited by szbalogh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ouff .... could you tell me why you want to stick pieces in a watch? No part of a watch should be glued. Follow the recommendations of other members who know the watches will help you. Never stick pieces in a watch. Even Chinese .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SeikoWatch said:
Ouff .... could you tell me why you want to stick pieces in a watch? No part of a watch should be glued. Follow the recommendations of other members who know the watches will help you. Never stick pieces in a watch. Even Chinese .

the dial doesn't have feet, that's why. However I think I will throw this in the thrash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superglue has no place inside a watch. [emoji45]

Dial dots if you really need to affix a dial.

 

Sent from my Honor 5c

 

the dial doesn't have feet, that's why. However I think I will throw this in the thrash

 

As i suggested above, this is what you should use to fix the dial in place.

 

http://www.esslinger.com/watch-repair-parts-watch-dial-adhesives-pkg-of-100/

 

Sent from my Honor 5c

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to trash it mate, time to learn, this I the fun bit, you now have completely strip it down, carefully inspecting every area a you need to find where that screw Came from (if it even belongs in this movement ) as there's no quality control in those chinese factory's that screw may of dropped in whilst being made.

Anyway go careful and you will eventually find what has gone wrong and why, I have worked on loads of these movements and although all is ted as a dg 2813 they have mostly all been different with each one throwing up its own unique challenges. Or you could just junk it and buy another for under £30 but then you won't be learning for the future.

Keep asking the questions asking we are here to help you ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, chriz74 said:

the dial doesn't have feet, that's why. However I think I will throw this in the thrash

oh i see but,... no need to trash  the watch,, the missing feet can be replaced and some new feet can be soldered.... ;)  Good luck

Here we have some experts that they can help you how to do ( Sorry i have a bad english ) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/04/2017 at 11:33 PM, StuartBaker104 said:

Sounds like you have dislodged the setting lever.

Unfortunately the solution to this requires removing the dial... which is just one reason why it's not a good idea to glue them on. Assuming this is a calendar movement you will also likely have to remove the date wheel. Watch out for the springs!

The rotor will feel slightly stiff in one direction and free in the other as most of these chinese movements only wind in one direction. As long as the rotor winds the watch under its own weight in one direction then this is normal.

 

So I disassembled the part, does anyone sees where the hacking lever is? What should be done here?

 

movimento.thumb.jpg.1759aac8f5cf81ddf3285fb92a4f6bc3.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done so far mate, but as a previous member said, the hacking lever is actually on the train side of the movement, you will have to reassemble the calender side and go in from the other side. It is actuated from the setting levers where you are at the moment but it is actually a small thin ( hairspring thin ) bit of metal that almost looks like a bridle on an auto mainspring. It is located on a post and one end is pushed by a setting lever whilst the other then in turn touches the balance wheel and stops it swinging.

Keep going ok and keep asking questions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are suggesting that I need to remove the back plate again? it was a nightmare to fit it back in.

Where is this lever in the picture? I don't see any lever, I think maybe in this movement the hacking lever is on the other side. I will take another picture.

IMG_1927.JPG

Edited by chriz74
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, szbalogh said:

In this movement the 4th wheel is touched by the stopping lever.

IMG_1927.JPG.c92428873b9804420bba0aa914f8f5f1.thumb.JPG.339f445619a0f182bb14a6399320c364.JPG

I see, well, what am I supposed to do with that? It seems to me that part is not movable and should be this on the other side:

 

dsds.jpg.978dd8a8749030cc28c589618f66f8e2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all the time I've been working on these movements I have not come across anything I'm afraid, they are all similar but again all have small differences. I apologise for possibly sending you a bum steer on the eher the hacking lever was located, I haven't come across one that hacks from the stem area, only from the train side as I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spring found and refitted (I think it was the hacking lever/spring). Hacking now works but still there's something that is not working correctly. There should be three positions, unscrewed nothing should happen, mid position should wind the watch and all the way out hacks the second hand and you can set the hours/minutes had. What happens the movmt winds when all the way in and nothing happens in mid position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...