Jump to content

Tweezers advice?


Recommended Posts

I tried a lot of of different tweezers as I pinged parts much too often. This was before I fully realized the importance of holding the parts as gently as you can without dropping them. 

After trying steel, titanium and brass I came across bronze tweezers from Boley and I have never looked back. Bronze is so soft and nice with a great feel. Just perfect for me for most anything apart from hairspring adjustment where it's Dumont #5. 

Stian 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

This is an interesting and "Helpful" thread and I thank you as I am shopping for tools. From this thread I have gathered that I should get Dumont #2 and #5 in brass. For S.S. I could go then with #3 and another #5. Advice would be greatly appreciated as well.

I too am amazed at Mark's video's and how steady his hands are, his knowledge and techniques, awestruck best clarify's this.

I have been doing some practice on junk watches, and finding that other than my unsteady hands, I have issues with tweezers and parts "popping" out and sailing away. The tweezers I am using are not the best and have not been shaped yet for watch work.  I also am wondering if I am squeezing too hard on them. I have made a small bench to work with, making it so that I would have good posture from the height and plenty of light. Probably my Irish luck so all suggestions and thoughts on the things that make a good technique will be very much appreciated.

Limited budget so I am keeping this to 4 tweezers to start with.

Have a wonderful day folks and blessings

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am using vetus tweezers but I haven't interrogated their quality at all...  Probably they're fake because i paid for them only $1 dollar... I don't know if it is necessary to get high quality tweezers....  Buy my budget is very limited... 

By the way i always make propaganda for cheap Chinese products on the forum. I am aware of that but it is not easy to live in a third world country, especially if you have lost your job... Everything is problem in such countries, you know... I need for your understanding...  Sorry for that... 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Few more question about Dumont tweezers before placing order.
 
1- While researching I read people preferring Dumont “brass” for certain tasks due to metal’s softness. For none-brass tweezers, should one choose DumonXel RC36 or harder DumoStar RC62 ?
 
2- Also, would one use “matte” rather than “polished” tweezers due to potential light reflexion or is it just a personal preference?
 
Lastly tweezers #3 & #5 have 2 different size specs.
 
Dumont #3 - straight tweezers sizes specs: 0.1/0.17mm vs 0.04/0.08mm
 
Dumont #5 - straight tweezers sizes specs : 0.06/0.1mm vs 0.01/0.05mm
 
3- Which specs for #3 and #5 are more adequate for watch repair ?
 
For information sharing, you will find Dumont straight tweezers specs sheet below:
 
 
Thank you,
AJ
Edited by ajdo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
17 hours ago, Kobus said:

Are the recommendation for pocket watch tweezers different than for wrist watches.

So for arguments sake settle on no. 2 and 5 for wrist watches, what is the recommendation for pocket watches?

Get brass tweezers, cheap but great for general handling, won't scratch parts, are easy to shape and dress as needed.
I now use steel /specialized tweezers only when necessary.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kobus said:

Are the recommendation for pocket watch tweezers different than for wrist watches.

So for arguments sake settle on no. 2 and 5 for wrist watches, what is the recommendation for pocket watches?

I use the same size tweezers for handling wristwatch and pocket watch parts; 1AM brass. No.2 steel are also good for handling almost anything, as long as you are gentle. No.5 steel for tweaking hairsprings etc. but not for picking things up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It boils down to personal preference.

If you have a light enough touch then No.5 and No.4 are fine for picking things up, but with a greater risk of things flying if you get a little heavier handed as the tips are more prone to flex. Also your No.5's won't last long if you do too much heavy lifting with them.

My go to tweezers are old carbon steel No.4's, some of which started life as No.5's but have been dressed so often that they are now effectively No.4's. I use these for handling screws, springs, and handling wheels by their steel pinions. For installing wire springs I use the same No.4's sometimes with a little assistance from some carbon steel No.2's. For handling plates, bridges, cocks, cut springs, and wheels where I'm handling the wheel rather than the pinion, I use brass No.3's. I also make extensive use of a couple of shaped brass rods of different diameters, and peg wood for handling and maneuvering parts. I haven't tried the acrylic swizzel sticks yet but I believe that they are very good.

The same set of tools does for everything from ladies wrist watch calibers through gents wrist and pocket watches up to desk clocks, and only gets bigger in scale if I need to use pliers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I would always recommend buying some old high quality tweezers instead of new ones of less quality. Tweezers are extension of your hands, and this is job done with hands.

Just keep attention that the tweezers are in fair condition, I bought used Dumont 2, 3, 4 and 5 as a pack and got them cheaper. For the beginning, 3 and 5 should do the job pretty well though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/2/2021 at 4:01 PM, StickDog said:

I've had good luck with Viola tweezers made in Italy.  Quality and finish matches Swiss.  Some brass models.  Priced around $10 a pair new on flea bay.  Think you'll be pleasantly surprised by price and quality.

Indeed. Wonder if they're still in business? Got mine from a material house on the days they were closing down.

DSC_0409_copy_768x1022.thumb.jpg.90f837193ddd3a3ab113b6f4b08fa641.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number 5 is very fine and delicate. I wouldn't bother with standard stainless steel as it's too soft for this pattern in my opinion.

 

If you are going to do work on quartz watches then I'd get the Dumostar. If you are doing work on mechanical watches and don't require antimagnetism then I'd find a set of "original" carbon steel types as it is the hardest. I use both types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello! I realized, as many others have, that steel tweezers have a reasonable chance of scratching bridges and mainplates despite being quite careful, so I bought some Bergeon Brass tweezers, which cost substantially more than the steel Bergeon tweezers. Now, the brass tweezers do not scratch the bridges and mainplates as much during handling, but you can still sometimes scratch the edges of bridges if you grip them by the tip of these brass tweezers.

I was wondering if minimizing brass tweezers scratching bridges and mainplates is down to user technique, or do you have to polish the edges of the brass tweezers until completely smooth? Also, I noticed that Bergeon does also carry what it calls as nickel tweezers (7420-PM-S5), although it contains copper, nickel and zinc, and is actually nickel silver/ German silver. Would this nickel tweezers be less likely to scratch bridges and mainplates, or face the same issues as brass tweezers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ifibrin said:

Hello! I realized, as many others have, that steel tweezers have a reasonable chance of scratching bridges and mainplates despite being quite careful, so I bought some Bergeon Brass tweezers, which cost substantially more than the steel Bergeon tweezers. Now, the brass tweezers do not scratch the bridges and mainplates as much during handling, but you can still sometimes scratch the edges of bridges if you grip them by the tip of these brass tweezers.

I was wondering if minimizing brass tweezers scratching bridges and mainplates is down to user technique, or do you have to polish the edges of the brass tweezers until completely smooth? Also, I noticed that Bergeon does also carry what it calls as nickel tweezers (7420-PM-S5), although it contains copper, nickel and zinc, and is actually nickel silver/ German silver. Would this nickel tweezers be less likely to scratch bridges and mainplates, or face the same issues as brass tweezers?

I use the Bergeon brass tweezers as well, I really love it for small parts and general use. i think it is actually manufactured by Dumont. But it is slightly softer, and the large/heavy parts (eg. bridges/barrels) may dent it ever so slightly. Also the parts may still get scratched in the process anyway. Brass tweezers may be overkill for handling large parts.

So what I actually do is I switch to an ultra cheap PVC/silicone tipped tweezers (from AliEx) for large parts, you can bend it to make it work better for you. The PVC tips makes it so much easier to grip these large parts, and is chemically inert. I even modified one just for picking up dials by holding it at the edges.

tweezers.thumb.jpg.ff5f09a7860eca6e9271ba1244351fd6.jpg

Edited by Zero
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Zero said:

I use the Bergeon brass tweezers as well, I really love it for small parts and general use. i think it is actually manufactured by Dumont. But it is slightly softer, and the large/heavy parts (eg. bridges/barrels) may dent it ever so slightly. Also the parts may still get scratched in the process anyway. Brass tweezers may be overkill for handling large parts.

So what I actually do is I switch to an ultra cheap PVC/silicone tipped tweezers (from AliEx) for large parts, you can bend it to make it work better for you. The PVC tips makes it so much easier to grip these large parts, and is chemically inert. I even modified one just for picking up dials by holding it at the edges.

tweezers.thumb.jpg.ff5f09a7860eca6e9271ba1244351fd6.jpg

Hello fellow Singaporean!

Now that you point it out, the small scratches on the edges of my brass tweezers may be from the large parts denting the brass tweezers! But the brass tweezers also can scratch the bridges and mainplate if you handle them wrongly, although to a much less degree than steel tweezers.

I like your PVC idea. Maybe I can make some plastic sleeves for my tweezers? The dial handling tweezers are a fantastic idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ifibrin said:

Hello fellow Singaporean!

Now that you point it out, the small scratches on the edges of my brass tweezers may be from the large parts denting the brass tweezers! But the brass tweezers also can scratch the bridges and mainplate if you handle them wrongly, although to a much less degree than steel tweezers.

I like your PVC idea. Maybe I can make some plastic sleeves for my tweezers? The dial handling tweezers are a fantastic idea.

Hi! 😃

I came up with the dial tweezers solution because I accidentally knocked off a tiny lume pip on the edge of one of my dials.

Plastic sleeves will work. Generic plastics may not be as robust as PVC though, which is supposedly chemically inert. I have seen junk watch parts create perplexing dents in my plastic containers. I'm assuming the oils caused the corrosion, as I didn't clean them before storage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ifibrin said:

Now, the brass tweezers do not scratch the bridges and mainplates as much during handling, but you can still sometimes scratch the edges of bridges if you grip them by the tip of these brass tweezers.

Maybe you can check out bronze tweezers. I don't know if these have been discussed in this topic but they have a reputation among demanding tools users. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have lots of vintage tweezers and have been primarily using a Dumont #3.  Have been very happy with them but I had to dress them a little.  They are not perfect.  So, it is Christmas, so I treated myself to a brand new pair of Dumont #3.

First impression:  Not as good as the vintage tweezer.  Action is harder. Relaxed spread is greater, so you have to squeeze further to close.  They are nice and pointed, so that is nice.

I hope my opinion changes.  Of all tools, tweezers are the most personal because of the delicate feedback you get as you are picking something up.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
×
×
  • Create New...