Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ro63rto said:

Today I shall be wearing this old USSR Sekonda
I've had it ages and never got round to reluming the hands.

fr7gYWa.jpg

Nice. Looks like a mid 70's vintage. Another watch with the 'day number/day name' arrangement like the 'Voken Automatic' too. I wonder if this style was more common in this period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AndyHull said:

I'm slowly working my way through all of the recent accusations. 

RIMG0237.thumb.JPG.230ae4f51de1c3bbe5628cdb3192a026.JPG

Today's watch of today a USSR Sekonda, which needed some major hairspring massaging, and the removal of every bodies favorite bicycle chain restorer (WD40). It says USSR, so it is clearly pre-1991 but its exact age, I don't know.

RIMG0242.thumb.JPG.a4f80b84aaa09b7a4a391fee0a2b4626.JPG

It will need a crystal, but it is now ticking along nicely. Another one for the club.

I seem to be monopolizing this thread somewhat, has anybody else recently picked up something nice to inspire us with?

Nice linen dial too. That particular watch has a lot going for it. I've been quietly taking my Seiko SKX007 apart again. I noticed that the day wheel was out of alignment with the date wheel by just enough to be annoying.  I've been accused of being OCD and ADD in the past. I want everything to be perfect, just not for very long. 

Relax Andy, you aren't monopolizing the thread at all. I'll have several to post over the next few days and besides, your posts are always informative and worth reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with a little OCD, when it comes to getting things just right.

Although when I had it back in beat to within 0.1ms and the thing was sitting at +20s/day or so, my OCD was screaming that the spring still wasn't perfectly kink free, as you can see from the image below.

The problem there of course is that you enter the territory of "fixing it till its broken worse", if you are not careful.

RIMG0247.thumb.JPG.37b26a2c1618c238011a7daa867a86f3.JPG

It was pretty messed up, with a near 90 degree kink in it, and a distinctly conical shape. The surrounding area and the HS was completely slicked with what I assume was WD40.

I presume the two were probably related. Some previous "repairer" probably gave it a scoot with the bike chain redeemer and watch nemesis, and caused the hairspring to gum together and concertina.

I cleaned the HS first, then carefully massaged it in situ, using a pair of very fine needle nosed tweezers. It probably took a good twenty minutes of small adjustments to get things perfectly concentric once more, and a further ten minutes to get it back in beat and also restore its accuracy.

I also resisted any urge to try to clean up the very slight mark on the dial from a previous issue with the hour hand touching the surface.

RIMG0249.thumb.JPG.644910328f8b549089c45d34a1c025ee.JPG

It presumably isn't obvious until I point it out, but once you know it is there, it can't be un-seen.  I'll just console myself with the idea that it adds to its character, otherwise I might be tempted to start fiddling and damage the rest of the dial.

Perhaps my OCD will get the better of me when I replace the crystal though. :D

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting photos and stories. I have a Sekonda and a Slava that share the same movement and case design, although they differ in the details. Both are automatic winding, with day/date display. They're nice to wear, and relatively accurate.

 

DSC_1681.JPG

DSC_1683.JPG

Edited by Gryf
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AndyHull said:

It presumably isn't obvious until I point it out, but once you know it is there, it can't be un-seen.  I'll just console myself with the idea that it adds to its character, otherwise I might be tempted to start fiddling and damage the rest of the dial.

 

I , like a few others , have damaged more then a couple of dials . More then I like to admit , and without regard of the brand or value of the watch . 

On the last few , thinking I had learned my lesson  ,  I used experience to tell myself ," stop , don't do it "...........to bad I didn't listen . 

I am starting to appreciate the character of any given watch , to the point that I am starting to accept patina and a clean rather then polished piece .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2015 at 4:01 AM, mk3 said:

 

Im sure that many of you wear different watches that have just been worked on, acquired or whatever. I tend to wear a watch on my left wrist for a while, whereas I find myself more frequently wearing a watch on the right too that I am testing or just because it appeals to me that day.

I do sometimes have one on each wrist when checking one out, partly because my most worn is a Seiko 5 (7s36 automatic with no manual wind).  One thing I discovered is that the Seiko runs about 10 seconds/day slower if worn on my right wrist.

 

20181010_074847.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strangely enough, I tend to do something similar.

The test watch on the left arm, and a quartz number on the right. Recently I have been using a Swatch as the watch to compare with.

Today, however I've been wearing a rather odd watch that came with a bundle of other stuff.

It is the most generic watch I have ever encountered. It has absolutely no branding on it.

The caseback is completely blank, the strap (which does appear to be leather).. blank..  and it arrived in a completely unworn condition.

Not a mark on it.

Quality wise, it is reasonable. Not a dollar store watch, but then again not something you would spend more than maybe forty bucks on, new.

So today I stuffed a battery in it, and substituted it for the Swatch.

This would actually make the ultimate crime of the century watch, since it appears to be completely untraceable.

The styling is very much what you would expect for a completely vanilla watch. Not unpleasant, but not particularly inspiring either.

Having said that, it wouldn't look out of place next to any of the modern "designer" watches.. yes you "Daniel Wellington".. I'm talking about you and your like. 

RIMG0266.thumb.JPG.aedcd57b89b1e4574d9926507c88302f.JPG

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice one Andy, but I can't help but wonder how that watch came to be. No branding at all is certainly not the norm. The chapter ring is a nice addition and I feel certain that it's a fairly recent design since it has the date but no day. More and more that complication is missing from new watches. Could you at least tell the country of origin from the movement when you had it open?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Strangely enough, I tend to do something similar.

The test watch on the left arm, and a quartz number on the right. Recently I have been using a Swatch as the watch to compare with.

Today, however I've been wearing a rather odd watch that came with a bundle of other stuff.

It is the most generic watch I have ever encountered. It has absolutely no branding on it.

The caseback is completely blank, the strap (which does appear to be leather).. blank..  and it arrived in a completely unworn

I like it...pure watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Todays. On test.

Nice little orient, suspect over oiled and ineffectually done, timegrapher results all over the place but eBay seller insists I should wear it a day to see. (Sigh).

It's not gaining as badly as expected but.....

2019-03-19 10.33.35.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AndyHull said:

is the most generic watch I have ever encountered. It has absolutely no branding on it.

T

RIMG0266.thumb.JPG.aedcd57b89b1e4574d9926507c88302f.JPG

I have a quartz alarm clock, also with no branding at all.  Turns out it's the most accurate clock I own (without some sort of automatic synching).  It's gained 6 seconds since I reset it for the end of DST, so it's on track for 18 seconds/year.

 

DSC00524.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a good rich dial colour. I like the gradient across the face.

This one is not nearly so vibrant, but not too shabby either.

RIMG0272.thumb.JPG.ab12ecd97edfa42058bf20cb1099cccd.JPG

I gave this little Ninio a quick spring clean. I suspect the dial has been repainted at some stage, but if so, they have made a reasonable job of it.

It is sitting around +/-20 sec/day, so not quite in the same league as the alarm clock, but not bad for a 17 jewel mass produced item.

Speaking of accuracy, the golden Citizen Cryston Quartz I mentioned the other day is actually loosing about 1 minute per day, so it looks like some previous attempt at repair included fiddling with the trimmer capacitor on the circuit board.

I'll need to dig out my frequency counter and fiddle it back to the correct place at some stage. I'll post a few pictures if and when I get some spare time to take a look at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What can I say. It is orange. Very, very orange... and black of course.
Where the no name white dial above, was brand free, this one screams its brand at you from the caseback and the dial.

RIMG0293.thumb.JPG.cd7ec854094c1ef8253554ca9f732db1.JPG

A fun watch, but not one for the big formal occasions I would suggest.. Its just a shame that the lumed hands are fake. Oh.. and I've just spotted. I've set the wrong date. :blink:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, m1ks said:

Todays. On test.

Nice little orient, suspect over oiled and ineffectually done, timegrapher results all over the place but eBay seller insists I should wear it a day to see. (Sigh).

It's not gaining as badly as expected but.....

imageproxy.php?img=&key=77f0dcc5ac0f9d5b

2019-03-19 10.33.35.jpg

I have a similar watch, with a blue dial. It is pretty erratic on the timer too. It keeps reasonable time over the course of the day, but doesn't look great in timegrapher.

When I get a chance to tear it apart again, I'll take a closer look and see if I can spot what is going on. My gut feeling is worn balance pivots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndyHull said:

I have a similar watch, with a blue dial. It is pretty erratic on the timer too. It keeps reasonable time over the course of the day, but doesn't look great in timegrapher.

When I get a chance to tear it apart again, I'll take a closer look and see if I can spot what is going on. My gut feeling is worn balance pivots. 

I'm going to test my other orient. That was a new boxed one I bought for my Dad many years ago which had little wear because it was quite dressy. I'll see how that looks on the timegrapher.

The green one above has a problem with the day/date changeover which bothers me more than gaining about 3 minutes over the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, m1ks said:

Todays on test on the wrist.

A nice little HMT pilot, (which I suspect is a bit of a frankenwatch, but I like it).

 

2019-03-20 12.21.11.jpg

I think it may well be a re-dial, but I'm no expert.

Somebody is missing a trick with those HMT re-dials. They clearly can make pretty much anything they want, so why don't they set up a "customize your own HMT" web site. 

Some of their re-dials are actually pretty neat, although I do object to all of the "Genuine Forits" and "Real Swiss 17 Jewel" fakes that show up regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndyHull said:

I think it may well be a re-dial, but I'm no expert.

Somebody is missing a trick with those HMT re-dials. They clearly can make pretty much anything they want, so why don't they set up a "customize your own HMT" web site. 

Some of their re-dials are actually pretty neat, although I do object to all of the "Genuine Forits" and "Real Swiss 17 Jewel" fakes that show up regularly.

Yes, the re dials are common but for the price of these watches getting a 100% original really doesn't matter. I particularly liked the red dial and submariner esque markers.

A website like that would be a great idea but I don't think HMT are in business any more?

Lovely 17 jewel mvt on these also. Based on citizen. (Sort of built under license), good and simple).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The red dial works very well.

You are correct, they don't really produce them in volume any more, however they do produce the odd batch now and then. 
Keep checking their website from time to time, HMT are in my opinion one of the most undervalued brands.

https://www.hmtwatches.in/18/products/eco-frnd-mechl-gents.htm

The quality is up to the standard of Citizen, since they were tied in with Citizen for their technology, and their mechanicals have the advantage of nearly all featuring stainless steel cases. I have a couple of very nice examples, which I picked up for pocket money prices on ebay.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today, I'm sporting a 25 jewel automatic "Suizo", which I would estimate is from the late fifties. It is going well, but I had to pop a little thread lock in the crown as it kept undoing itself.

It had a fairly lengthy crystal polishing session, but there are still a couple of deep scratches remaining, so I may replace that. I resisted the urge to clean the dial, as it looks a little delicate. Maybe if I replace the crystal I might be tempted to revisit that idea.

It was on a rather dilapidated "depilatory band", which may once have been roughly golden in colour,  but I think it looks a whole lot more refined on a simple brown leather strap.

RIMG0299.thumb.JPG.4557978c93d16f624d20d39fa7485c98.JPG

It arrived with the usual layers of grime, both internal and external, but is now shining like a new pin and ticking away nicely.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's choice is actually a fairly recent vintage. I purchased it from an acquaintance that just didn't care for it any longer. He stated that it was also inaccurate, losing several minutes/day. After some good spirited haggling, I bought it for $25. I replaced the original nylon band with a new one that I had on hand. Mine is an 18mm zulu style with matte finished stainless hardware to match the case. My  photo shows it in the process of changing the date at 11:45 pm. It didn't finish rolling over the day disc until 03:00, which is about normal for this movement. 

The watch is powered by the Seiko 7S26c movement and after wearing it and leaving it on the nightstand both dial up and dial down over consecutive nights, it is +4 seconds from when I set it a week ago. I have no idea what he was referring to regarding accuracy as this is well within mfgr's specs. It has the display style back but nothing fancy to see there. The original strap had a leather insert where the holes are punched and it had dry rotted. My total outlay so far is $31 USD. It's a nice little package with the matte finish stainless case. It won't be quite so prone to showing scratches as I intend this to be my daily wearer when mowing or working in my yard.

Seiko5_50.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi this is my first post, so be gentle.
This is my work watch. I got it from eBay for about £17. It had trouble displaying the date. I rectified this by putting the correct sized cell in it and haven't looked back. The supplied cell was so big it pushed the date wheel against the internals causing it to catch.It has loads of scratches, the chrome has worn off, the dial is Sun bleached but it is water tight and the lume still shines. I love the look of it, real honest grafting watch.7f0f6934da3e4f539ec110f2e13a9873.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Got another one today! It took 10 weeks, but finally arrived. Fairly complete but I added the pivot guage. The burnisher and bow came with the tool. The case is a bit rough and the tool pretty dirty, but trying to decide how much I want to restore.
    • OK, so long story short, I'm working my way through Mark's courses using a "Sea-gul ST36" (or ST3600 from some vendors) AKA an ETA 6497 clone. as a practice piece.  I've had it fully appart and cleaned it, and have had it fully back together an "running", but only briefly as my oil hadn't arrived at the time.  In the course of that work, I saw no markings on the movement that would tell me if it was a true Sea-gul or just a clone of their clone of the original ETA movement. Well, fast forward to this weekend, when my oils arrived in my mailbox and I sat down to try my hand at oiling.  Everything was going swimmingly until I got to the shock setting on the top of the balance cock.  I was able to open the lyre spring without issue, but in attempting to swing the open to access the cap jewel and chaton, I apparently accidentally pressed the launch button as I sent the lyre spring into low earth orbit.  Like most things that make into such orbits it came back down at a place not too far from where it started, but of course that also means that it is no longer in the setting. So my task is now to get said spring back into setting.  What I have read so far tells me that I seem to have two options: Another thread here seems to indicate that the spring came out without taking the balance cock apart, therefore it should go back without the need for that procedure.  That seems a bit pie in the sky for me, but the posts in said thread also gave some high level information about how to get the spring back in (putting it at an angle to the channel cut in the cock and canted so that the tabs fit in the slots, followed by some "wiggling" to get it turned around the right direction.)  I've tried this a couple of times, which have lead to more trips to low earth orbit, but with successful recovery of the orbital vehicle after each trip.  This thread also suggests that what I did to cause the initial launch was to push the spring "back" with more pressure on one side than the other, which put it under tension and caused it to deform out the slot either on one side or at the end (where there is apparently no "back stop".) The other option appears to be varying degrees of disassembly of the balance cock.  Some things I've read suggest that the whole shock setting needs to come out, while other threads here suggest that I only need to remove the regulator arm and the arm carrying the balance stud.  After the last trip the spring made, this is seeming like a better option, but I'm super short on details on how to do what needs to be done.  if I am following correctly: I need to loose the balance spring stud screw so the stud is not held in the arm. I need to somehow disengage the balance spring from the regulator (all the regulators I've seen in videos look nothing like what I see on the balance cock I have.)  What I've seen on the interwebs is a couple of "pins" that the spring passes through.  What I see on my assembly is something that looks more like a single pin with a "V" shaped notch cut in the bottom of it.  The spring is secured in that notch with something that I guessed was glue, Posts here suggest that on some of these movements glue is in fact used.  So I'm trying to figure out how to tell, how to soften dissolve it (I'm guessing IPA or acetone) and how to put it back when I'm done (superglue?  UV glue?) With the spring detached from the cock, I've read that the regulator and stud carrier are basically glorified C clamps around the shock setting and that one removes them by slipping a razor blade under one side of each and prizing them up.  I assume that they go back in the reverse manner like another C clamp, but that again is only a guess.  The place I got this information from seemed to leave that bit out. Once I have one or both arms off the shock setting the above mentioned post seemed to indicate that I could just slide the spring back in the slot, though again, I'm interpolating between the lines I read.  The alternative that I've seen demonstrated on high end movements on Youtube is to remove the entire shock setting and to replace the spring from "underneath" rotating the setting so that spring basically falls into place. I'm not anxious to try this method, as I don't have a jeweling tool to put the shock setting back into place.  That not to mention that the professional watch maker who did the demonstration described "fiddly work." So at the end of the day I'm looking for a little guidance on which pathway to follow, or if I've missed something obvious, a new direction to follow.  If this is a repair that just need to wait until my skills improve I'm totally good with that, I can get another of these movements in relatively short order, I just don't want to treat this one as disposable, and I do want to make an honest effort at fixing it and learning from this experience. Thank you in advance for reading my ramblings and for any suggestions that you might have!
    • All the best, family always comes first, and I believe you have made the right call that you mother deserves your full attention. However, when you need a little outside distraction the guys here will always be available for some banter or a heated discussion on lubrication 🤣.
    • Wire for what? if it's steel then only certain types of steel can be hardened ie high carbon steels: "Mild steel doesn't harden very well. It doesn't have enough carbon. Get something like O1, silver steel or if you want to go full watchmaker, then Sandvik 20AP". Source
    • I'm wondering if there's any specific type of wire I should get for hardening? I would assume it doesn't matter as long as the wire doesn't melt before it is at temp. 
×
×
  • Create New...