Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

On 12/3/2019 at 5:11 PM, yankeedog said:

Most esteemed  friends...I present  to you my Mumbai  Homage. Old amphibia case with 2209 movement. A glorious  fake dial glued in place. However, unlike  most fakes you will find the 200 meter rating  is legitimate. I am sorry..I just had to.

20191203_120513.jpg

THAT is stunning.

A genuine Voslex Amphibimariner, ultra rare status on the eBay 'rare' scale. :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, watchguy74 said:

Not that I could see was hoping you might know.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

You would probably need to remove the mechanism, to check. The date code, if there is one,  will be below the level of the crystal, and not visible without removing the movement from the case.

EDIT: I didn't know Timex did "jump hour" digital watches, but a quick google trawl shows a couple of examples including one with a Swiss jeweled movement.


Strictly speaking it isn't a "jump hour", but a direct read digital. I couldn't find any similar examples, so it is also fairly rare. Maybe not a true jump hour, but none the less, it is pretty neat. I want one. :D

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, watchguy74 said:

Picked this up recently do not know much about it but really liking it maybe@JerseyMo may know something about it as he is the Timex king emoji16.png.e4825025dd43271e32be2ec26c7deb9d.jpgd20dab400dc467c5c59af00e85bacb4c.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Does the white "TIMEX" disk rotate around a static dial disk with the numbers on it, or does the numeric plate rotate under a fixed white "TIMEX" disk?

My guess is that the dial is fixed, and the "TIMEX" plate is effectively a circular plastic hour hand with a window that shows the numbers on the dial beneath, in which case it is a very similar arrangement to my tennis playing Snoopy with its transparent second hand with a tennis ball on it.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the white "TIMEX" disk rotate around a static dial disk with the numbers on it, or does the numeric plate rotate under a fixed white "TIMEX" disk?

My guess is that the dial is fixed, and the "TIMEX" plate is effectively a circular plastic hour hand with a window that shows the numbers on the dial beneath, in which case it is a very similar arrangement to my tennis playing Snoopy with its transparent second hand with a tennis ball on it.
Yes the Timex disc rotates around like a minute hand.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, watchguy74 said:

Yes the Timex disc rotates around like a minute hand.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

A nifty solution, since this allowed them to use a standard mechanism. 

Did you find the dial style number?
It will be printed on the metal dial disk down at the 3 O'clock position, and as I said before, you  may not be able to see it without removing the mechanism from the case.
My guess is that it starts with 3XXX the last two digits will be the year of manufacture.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nifty solution, since this allowed them to use a standard mechanism. 

Did you find the dial style number?

It will be printed on the metal dial disk down at the 3 O'clock position, and as I said before, you  may not be able to see it without removing the mechanism from the case.

My guess is that it starts with 3XXX the last two digits will be the year of manufacture.

There isn't any numbers anyplace I can see here is photo with dial removed.ea433dbd3a13b3b34d56291326a27aba.jpg&key=9d016f3e262e3e0e41b33e4ebc583d07bd2a86c45022f748b4736da37ec155fe1526e954cfa3f93e4af71d126cb6378e.jpg&key=be32c074b56ef63cc965645c4529d89e5382d5fb8d9ef75ee70ac2d842339ada

 

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

 

 

f619cc23d33660eb1ca5707956e31b55.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if this is a prototype? An idea Timex toyed around with and developed a prototype and possibly a few sales samples and then abandoned without going into full production. We can estimate the age by the movement, if it dates to the late 60's through the late 70's, then Jump hour/ direct read watches were en-vogue. Many companies develop products without ever going into production, this may very well be such an example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The number might be visible if the hands were removed, but that seems like a slightly dangerous move.

Typically it would be on the dial plate, so in this case,  the circular hour hand would be covering it completely.

No worries, the exact designation is of purely academic interest. It looks too well finished for a prototype, but you never know of course.

No doubt some former Timex employee (in Dundee perhaps) might know the history of this particular piece.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having worked for many years in manufacturing, my experience allows me to make a few assumptions. If Timex was ramping up to begin production on this and the market for this type of watch suddenly crashed, (which it did) they would very logically pull the plug on it. There could easily have been a small handful of these of a more refined quality than a crude prototype. It is also logical to conclude a former employee may have ended up with this piece because of their access. In any case, it is an amazing watch.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's watch is my vintage Vostok Komandirskie. You may recognize it as the exact model Mark featured in his recent YouTube video with the pallet issue. I liked the one he chose so much, I had to get one for myself. I absolutely LOVE the patina on the dial. As Mark mentioned his was a bit of a Frankenwatch, mine is as well. Amphibia case, Komandirskie movement and dial and a no name bracelet that was once two tone gold and stainless but the gold was scrubbed away. I'm still waiting on my scuba dude like the one mark also featured, but that one is taking the slow road from Russia:rolleyes:

20191213_074717.jpg

20191213_085225.jpg

20191213_085313.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2019 at 8:55 AM, FLwatchguy73 said:

Today's watch is my vintage Vostok Komandirskie. You may recognize it as the exact model Mark featured in his recent YouTube video with the pallet issue. I liked the one he chose so much, I had to get one for myself. I absolutely LOVE the patina on the dial. As Mark mentioned his was a bit of a Frankenwatch, mine is as well. Amphibia case, Komandirskie movement and dial and a no name bracelet that was once two tone gold and stainless but the gold was scrubbed away. I'm still waiting on my scuba dude like the one mark also featured, but that one is taking the slow road from Russia:rolleyes:

20191213_074717.jpg

20191213_085225.jpg

20191213_085313.jpg

I would  call it an amphibia with a komamdirskie dial. It is after all the case that qualifies it as an amphibia. And since  it is a 24xx movement  current  production  dials from mother  Russia will  fit.very cool.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AS1187 powered  Mondia. This one runs pretty  nicely. About 220 degrees  amplitude  10 seconds  fast at .7 ms beat error..curiously it is all stainless swiss cased..and has an acceptable  beat error. I have noticed  that  very  often  cheaply cased AS1187's  have pretty  large  beat errors. Factory  seconds maybe.Or hasty  off shore  assembly. 

20191214_125514.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, yankeedog said:

I would  call it an amphibia with a komamdirskie dial. It is after all the case that qualifies it as an amphibia. And since  it is a 24xx movement  current  production  dials from mother  Russia will  fit.very cool.

Amphibirskie or Komanphibia...hmm:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...