Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Interestingly, it would now theoretically be possible to 3D print objects with sub 10 micron resolution, so if you know anyone with a high end 3D  printer, then you might be able to fabricate these disks. If my recent experience of examining quartz chronographs is anything to go by, you may even be able to fabricate them in nylon or other similar polymers, rather than metal.

Furthermore high quality laser cutters can in theory cut to sub 1/1200 of an inch (0.0021166582mm) so if there is a market for these spares, and you can find some way to fabricate them, then you may be able to produce and sell them.

Might be a really good opportunity. Get in there, Andy, before someone else makes their millions from your idea!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RIMG0689.thumb.JPG.89fb87f1591a3781afc8c46f17b6ebb8.JPG

A 17 Jewel "superflat" EB88XX (EB 8805) based dress watch with the rather strange moniker "Dimetron".

s-l1600.jpg&key=7b44e42985a546c84ea85b10

This arrived in a fairly sad condition, scratched up, fully wound, and locked up unable to set the hands, and of course filthy, but the sunburst blue dial made it almost irresistible. Well that and the strange name of course. 

I have absolutely no idea who actually produced it, but following its service and clean, it pretty classy. The most tricky thing about servicing the EB8805 is the date mechanism, which can be a little bit of a head-scratcher, but other than re-fitting that, things went without a hitch. No flying springs or mysterious vanishings.   

This EB88XX lacks the balance shock protection, but is fully jeweled.

The photograph doesn't do it justice, it has a very nice shimmer to the dial, and the slight wear to the plating is almost invisible under normal lighting. The crystal is the worlds worst dust magnet, but I'm going to give that a further polish anyway, then I'll give it a scoot with the glass cleaning spray and that should settle down. This is the original crystal, cleaned and polished.

I'm in two minds about the strap it is currently on. That may get swapped for something a little more formal.

It is of course a fully paid up member of the 404 club.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ro63rto said:

Love the dial and 3 style of markers.

It is pretty good, all the more so considering it cost a mere 0.99p plus P+P

image.png.c9119109cf5d1d47e28effbd414a2f5b.png

It didn't come with the case though, for that price.

I'm not a big fan of the EB8800 series movements, they are a little primitive, and prone to issues, but this one, following a bit of TLC is sitting around +/- 10sec per day with a swing in excess of 270 degrees and a sub 1ms beat error so I can't really complain.

I will certainly wear it, unlike for example the strange blue acrylic number I posted about the other day.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites



It is pretty good, all the more so considering it cost a mere 0.99p plus P+P
image.png.c9119109cf5d1d47e28effbd414a2f5b.png
It didn't come with the case though, for that price.
I'm not a big fan of the EB8800 series movements, they are a little primitive, and prone to issues, but this one, following a bit of TLC is sitting around +/- 10sec per day with a swing in excess of 270 degrees and a sub 1ms beat error so I can't really complain.


EB8800 not that bad.....
Spring to life after approx 45 years.
https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/applications/tapatalk/index.php?/topic/1685-1960's-Jaguar-Small-Brass-Desk-Clock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they work, they are pretty robust, but there are a couple of issues.

That bridge holding in the mainspring for one. It tends to weaken over time, letting the spring explosively unwind taking a few teeth with it. The lack of shock protection on a lot of them is also an issue, as I have seen quite a number with broken balances.

On the plus side, they were produced in huge numbers over a long period from 1965 onward, so getting donors for spares is not too difficult, and they are fairly easy to strip and re-assemble. Also the parts seem to be interchangeable between the jeweled and un-jeweled variants, and the numerous different balances with/without shock protection seem to be interchangeable too.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they work, they are pretty robust, but there are a couple of issues.
That bridge holding in the mainspring for one. It tends to weaken over time, letting the spring explosively unwind taking a few teeth with it. The lack of shock protection on a lot of them is also an issue, as I have seen quite a number with broken balances.
On the plus side, they were produced in huge numbers over a long period from 1965 onward, so getting donors for spares is not too difficult, and they are fairly easy to strip and re-assemble. Also the parts seem to be interchangeable between the jeweled and un-jeweled variants, and the numerous different balances with/without shock protection seem to be interchangeable too.
What are they like compared to a BFG866 ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ro63rto said:
10 minutes ago, AndyHull said:
When they work, they are pretty robust, but there are a couple of issues.
That bridge holding in the mainspring for one. It tends to weaken over time, letting the spring explosively unwind taking a few teeth with it. The lack of shock protection on a lot of them is also an issue, as I have seen quite a number with broken balances.
On the plus side, they were produced in huge numbers over a long period from 1965 onward, so getting donors for spares is not too difficult, and they are fairly easy to strip and re-assemble. Also the parts seem to be interchangeable between the jeweled and un-jeweled variants, and the numerous different balances with/without shock protection seem to be interchangeable too.

What are they like compared to a BFG866 ?

I would think pretty similar in terms of robustness. In my opinion,  the BFG866 is more of a faf to put back together.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there is one mystery solved. I know where it was made, roughly when, and by whom.

http://www.mikrolisk.de/show.php?site=280&suchwort=Bero&searchWhere=all

Dimetron        Bero SA     Biel, Schweiz; registriert am 22.11.1973

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biel/Bienne

.. so it may not be a Rolex, but it was made in the same town as Rolex.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, AndyHull said:

I'm not a big fan of the EB8800 series movements, they are a little primitive, and prone to issues, but this one, following a bit of TLC is sitting around +/- 10sec per day with a swing in excess of 270 degrees and a sub 1ms beat error so I can't really complain.

The "Dimetron" ran flawlessly overnight and all day today, and this is what I currently see (not rewound yet), so maybe I'll revise my opinion on the EB88XX - Give it a bath, and off it goes.

image.png.28188e7b376bcbe23804ed9215521f04.png

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a "Two for one" day today, and speaking of unaligned dates, I finally got round to sorting the sticky day disk on this bright yellow HMT Rajat, so it is getting a bit of an airing along side the "Dimetron".

RIMG0694.thumb.JPG.d40b7783d8249b18f912943fe98965bb.JPG

This picture gives a slightly better impression of the shimmering blue sunburst  dial of the Dimetron and the almost fluorescent yellow of the HMT. Its all so bright I think I need to wear shades.B) 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, yankeedog said:

you should be able to do standard round crystal,no?

Yes, a standard round crystal will fit but it I'll be keeping this one for now as it fits with the design of the case lines.

I'm not a huge fan of the faceted crystals typically but this one fits the case design. A replacement nos one would be nice but I'll tty polishing this one of not when I can get some buffing wheels and compound to try it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AndyHull said:

It is a "Two for one" day today, and speaking of unaligned dates, I finally got round to sorting the sticky day disk on this bright yellow HMT Rajat, so it is getting a bit of an airing along side the "Dimetron".

RIMG0694.thumb.JPG.d40b7783d8249b18f912943fe98965bb.JPG

This picture gives a slightly better impression of the shimmering blue sunburst  dial of the Dimetron and the almost fluorescent yellow of the HMT. Its all so bright I think I need to wear shades.B) 

 

 

Not familiar  with hmt automatics.citizen licensed movement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, yankeedog said:

Not familiar  with hmt automatics.citizen licensed movement?

Yes, the HMT 6501 is licensed Citizen 6501.

HMT_6501.jpg

It is a shame they have ceased production, as they are well made, and virtually indistinguishable from the Citizen 6501

apart from the logo and brushed finish on the rotor.

Citizen_6501.jpg

The same, or very similar movement is also referred to as the HMT6906

HMT_6906.jpg

Edited by AndyHull
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
×
×
  • Create New...