Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

On 6/8/2019 at 10:48 AM, ro63rto said:

Engineer today

New OEM crystal gasket and crystal

Still to do - refinish bezel, refinish bracelet, find or make bezel filler ring

 

2I4T0lb.jpg&key=e4efa397a0050d583419126dd7da8884a3b6eb515ba6d481c43010d392fb2df0

 

 

I suppose You could refinish as suggested.I think it looks great as is.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I barely managed to resist the urge to don my ten gallon hat and chaps and head off to the pub with no beer

RIMG0509.thumb.JPG.49e93f25769856b92772c0418d33fbc0.JPG

The "Rodeo" is getting a ride round the range on my wrist today.

It is actually pretty well behaved in terms of keeping time. That mystery 17 jewel french movement performs about -10 to +15 s/day hovering near 0.3 ms and managing a fairly healthy 287 degrees of swing at 21600bph.

299711459_Screenshotat2019-06-1313-58-06.png.54b7d7c539fc4ddc9a02a35b5b64e95e.png

The bizarre transparent burgundy case sometimes makes it appear that the crown is backlit by an LED.

A strange but interesting addition to the 404 club collection.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7A28-7040? Got one of those in Hong Kong back in '83.still have it.but it isn't running.
Yup. Dec '82 so quite an early one.
Unfortunately got just the head. It's on a SS bracelet I got off eBay for £10.
It went off with a few others to George Clarkson in Berlin to perform his magic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a fancy watch branded? I mean, I haven't heard the brand Depraz anytime before. So I was just wondering if that's genuine with good quality.

The D logo looks like an old font used by sports company Donnay [emoji1]

"Depraz" name looks to have been registered in 23/05/1986

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I searched Depraz a few weeks ago and could not find any reference. There was an ad on ebay for a watch. It was priced £10 and did not sell.

I found a lot of ref to Dubois-Depraz which if I remember right was more of a high end movement. So I came to the conclusion it was a cheap knock off. Can't confirm that though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, noirrac1j said:

Are those decorative CORK inserts?!?

 

Joe

I think it is all ceramic. I believe the term is "Fat Lava".

This has apparently become collectible, so if you have any garish pottery from the period, you may find it is worth more than you thought.

Incidentally, some of the glazes used contain uranium, which is unsurprisingly, mildly radioactive, so grab a nice red or green example, and you have something to store all that used radium and tritium lume in. Collect enough and you can get yourself on an international "watch" list of an entirely different sort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eezy said:

I searched Depraz a few weeks ago and could not find any reference.

I did a full service on a 70's Depraz a few weeks ago.

Details on my blog if anyone is interested.

Link in my signature below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Marc said:

I did a full service on a 70's Depraz a few weeks ago.

Details on my blog if anyone is interested.

Link in my signature below.

Thank you Marc. That's more info than I found. 

So it is a separate company to Dubois Depraz but not a copy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...