Jump to content

Fix For Balance Wheel And Spring


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I took a preliminary view of this movement ( looks like someone was using it to dig a trench) and I noticed the balance wheel and spring have come apart. This may be may first opportunity to fix a hair spring. Only I don't know where to start.

 

post-253-0-15054900-1404937362_thumb.jpg

 

It is hard to see, but the end of the hair spring is attached so what appear to be part of the balance cock which has in turn become loose. I can't figure out how that spring came to be on top of the balance cock and where to affix that end (looks like a ring).

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated and I thank you in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Robert, you really have a tricky problem here, so here's my take on it.

It looks like a Seiko movement,and the part that is free (for setting the beat) should be underneath the regulator.

There should be a small screw securing the hairspring stud to the piece that is loose. Slacken this screw and remove the part from the hairspring.

Remove the remaining parts of the balance assembly in the normal way and pin it upside down on a piece of cork to make it easier to work on.

Turn the movable guide pin on the regulator to allow the hairspring and balance to be removed from the cock. Place the balance out of the way to be worked on later.

Now assemble the balance cock assembly correctly with the regulator on top of the beat adjuster.

It's now time to sort out the hairspring. It should be perfectly concentric with the balance staff and flat and parallel to the balance wheel. If not, then here comes the hard bit. You will have to stroke it very very gently to get the desired shape. I used two pairs of fine tweezers for doing this. Be careful not to twist the spring in the process, or it will not slide smoothly through the guide pins. If you are lucky you may manage this with the hairspring still attached to the balance staff, if not, remove it having first noted the position it is fitted relative to the roller jewel. ALL OF THE ABOVE IS VERY DIFFICULT AND YOU MAY END UP TOTALY DESTROYING THE HAIRSPRING.

If successful, reassemble and let the timing begin. You will have to adjust the beat first then regulate it.

Have fun!

Edited by Geo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent instructions Geo, I appreciate your help. I'll do exactly as you say. This is some sort of Seiko clone I got in a batch of movements "for training purposes". If I screw up it is no big deal although I would prefer not to. Somehow I get attached to those poor, mistreated movements regardless of pedigree!  :nurse:  I can easily tell you, this one never had a gold case for sure!

 

In any case, I'll get back with any developments (I'll be working on it in the morning)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is a clone, could the the beat adjuster possibly be mounted on top of the regulator? I' sure it will be clear how it goes when you study it with a lupe.

I meant to say that when pinning it to the piece of cork, I use a small screwdriver through the screw hole in the balance cock.

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Geo, I did part of the job but had to interrupt it for other matters. The balance is free and the spring is as fine as possible (I had to play with it but in the end I managed to leave it in almost pristine shape). That's what took so long.

 

Absolutely, the beat adjuster does go on top of the regulator as you rightly guessed, I just have to find a way to attach it there my guru friend! ("looking around my work bench and figuring what to use, mental inventory: hammer, chisel, metal saw,.... too big, tiny watch screwdrivers... I guess not, rodico, super-glue...ok back to that later...no pinning stuff in my **BLEEP**nal yet, 'will have to improvise!") :phew:

 

I will assemble the whole thing either tomorrow morning or tonight when I get home from work. Then it will be time for full disassembly of the movement, prep for cleaning, ultrasonic bath, x20 inspection and if everything checks, reassembly and testing. Thanks for your help, I'll keep you posted of new developments and post a picture of the wheel and cock complete.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again I got a problem with a air spring,the air spring has broken in two just past the regulator part,so balance wheel no longer on spring,can I repair this on my bravingtons watch or can I get a new spring to put in the watch,hope any one can help

Repairing the spring is not an option, you will have to fit, or have fitted a new hairspring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Christopher, if you have good experience taking watches apart and servicing them, then you may be ready to progress to the highly delicate job of fitting a hairspring, if not I suggest that you take it to a professional watch repairer to have it replace.

Could take a high definition picture of the movement, to allow identification of the movement. Bravingtons used movements from different manufactures in their watches. This is required to see if a hairspring is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi chriseames168, when the movement is identified -- just as Geo said -- and if you are in the US -- or want to try this option --, otto frei has all sort of hairsprings to be fitted. You only need certain specs (regarding the wire dimensions, as listed in his page) to have the right one sent. Once you get it, you can fit it, which might involve some cutting to size and "fabricating" the proper dog leg, etc. Alternatively, he may have a complete balance/hairspring assembly available...I recently ordered one (without the cock) for an eta 2801-2. It is a little pricey that way but most of the work is already done for you, specially if you don't have the right tools or the experience in that kind of job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An update about the original thread:

 

I was able to re-attach the actual parts to the cock. They are held in place by a U-clip that attaches to the lower jewel housing. This housing has a lip all around that holds down both parts of the regulator (rings, one of them loose originally). My solution -- thanks Geo for valuable instructions -- was to "think inverted", i.e. upon disassembly, I set up first the jewel assembly, upside down, on the bench, on top the two regulator parts and finally the cock upside down. Holding/pressing down with tweezers the jewel housing protrudes from the cock enough to insert the clip back in place. Now with the whole thing re-assembled is time to re-attach the hair spring. Pictures will be coming soon....to be continued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Geo, I've been working on this on and off since it requires lots of time and patience. On the other hand, I was looking at this bunch of movements (Seiko like, not Seiko) and they have a different shock protection system (as in the original picture in this thread). I don't know if I ever said that I lost the bottom part of a 7S26 diashock assembly, the one on the main plate. Maybe much later when I'm done with the "hairspring movement" I'll "transplant" one of these easy to work on shock systems  to the 7S26 plate and see if it works...OK this is work in progress for now but I'll post the results in time.

 

(This is hilarious, I was trying to edit and clicked in the "like it" button!! ooops!

Edited by bobm12
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again I got a problem with a air spring,the air spring has broken in two just past the regulator part,so balance wheel no longer on spring,can I repair this on my bravingtons watch or can I get a new spring to put in the watch,hope any one can help

I've managed to ascertain that the movement in your watch is an ETA 1256. I would suggest that you buy a movement with a good balance wheel and hairspring on EBay. Here is a photo of the movement, maybe someone on the forum has one lying around and can help you.

post-124-0-53011000-1405374163_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Geo, is your middle name Sherlock by any chance? :thumbsu:  I think I have a "practice" movement that came with the same/similar automatic system but is not ETA. Some sort of clone (of something). The balance is shot so it is useless even if it ever fits, sorry (I would have donated it for a good cause if at all usable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Geo, is your middle name Sherlock by any chance? :thumbsu: 

I wish!

Christopher could not manage to post pictures so he emailed them to me and asked if I could help. The resolution was low but there was enough information for me to guess the calibre number. I then found a hi resolution photo on the net and used that. Being ETA it has been used in many high end watches, so picking up a movement on EBay is a good option. The movement dates from between 1950 & 1954.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is confusing.. first we're talking about a seiko and then an ETA1256?

 

Anyway.. the ETA is one of my favourites...

 

1.it was the first autowind by ETA ..

 

2.On most of the ones I've seen the automodule screws are labelled 'A' with instructions on the rotor to 'remove 'a''. I can imagine back in the day when auto's where 'new-fangled' and watchmakers had to be guided thru this amazing new technology.

 

3.The dial feet are symetrical.. it is possible to make a 'left-handed' watch for your lefty friends.!!

 

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is confusing.. first we're talking about a seiko and then an ETA1256?

 

Hi Anil.

The confusion was caused by Christopher coming in with hairspring questions not related to the original post by Robert!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an update of the work involved, after this step we will re-attach the balance and spring. Notice that the outermost part of the regulator is where the hairspring is attached. So basically we are thinking inverted since the cock is upside down for assembly. More to come... 

post-253-0-75722300-1405776361_thumb.jpg

post-253-0-06983700-1405776397_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I've been having "fun" with this movement ever since I started fixing it,

 

First, I lost the camera SD ship to take more pictures, but I "passed" that step (I reassembled it)

Then the SD ship re-appeared and I disassembled the whole thing to take the pictures above.

Then and just after that final picture, I lost the clip! It just jumped into nowhere.

Now we need to wait until I lose another part and in substitution the clip reappears!

Edited by bobm12
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
    • Hi.  I would like to take issue here regarding battery driven , watches, clocks,etc. I will and do repair these clocks in fact I have sever al in my collection as well as the regular mechanical ones. I have one on my mantle piece over 60 years old tha belonged to my wife’s Aunt,  long gone Iam afraid and it has been cleaned etc and never missed a beat and is accurate. Every one has their preduices as regards Electrical /electronic Horology but I regard it as part of the progress time line of the art of Horology and to be treated as such. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution it evolved.  Two cavemen knocking rocks together and a shard broke off , looking at it he worked out if it was stuck on the end of a stick he would have a spear. Likewise his pal seeing what he was up to picked up a piece  and did the same, now that’s evolution. Some clockmaker decided to build a clock that ran with a battery and no spring to wind up and break, progress and both the mechanical and battery driven clocks evolved, the battery ones got better to the point that if it broke you changed the complete unit. Likewise watches did the same but both can be repaired by people who approach Horology with an open mind without preduice.  We all have our likes and dislikes bu I for one would never dismiss any technology because I don’t like it.   The mobile phone is a good example of modern technology at work as is the automotive industry. There buttons and switches in my car I don’t use because to me they are not nesessary but I still drive the car.
    • I haven't gone through all the reading of what it might be or not. The first thing I would do if nothing obvious stands out is replace the mainspring, you have to start at the source of the power. Nine times out of ten that is the problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...