Jump to content

Possibly stupid beginner question...


Pip

Recommended Posts

Oh, so you don't set the seconds hand to 12 as well?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Just re-read that and it may have sounded a bit facetious. It was an honest question so apologies if it came out wrong.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can set the second hand anywhere convenient. I too try very hard to have it pointing exactly at one of the second marks, not between them. That's less important with a mechanical watch, which usually advances 5 or more times per second, but important with a battery operated watch which advances only once per second.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Pip, I was trained to set all the hands at 12.

As said previously, advance the watch until the day and date change, at that point fit the hour hand, I advance 24 hours again to make sure it's on the money, date must change first, followed closely by day, (I was trained at a Rolex funded school, these were their tolerances) once happy with hour hand alignment fit minute, again at 12, once again advance 24 hours to confirm day and date change are correct, a consistent date change in a 4 minute window is acceptable, two minutes to and two minutes after 12. Again set seconds hand with all hands at 12.

The reason for this is you can get your hand spacing correct, the space from the dial to the hour hand, hour to minute, minute to seconds should all be consistent, obviously as said earlier it is vital the seconds clears the crystal, if that is an issue lower the whole hand group, again you are looking for equal gaps between the hands, small points like this really make a watchmaker stand out from the crowd, make it a habit!

Good luck and keep enjoying working on your watches.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a note for those who come searching for information on this topic in the future.  I did eventually find the Mark's video on how to replace these springs, as someone observed, he does in fact make the replacement look easy.  (It actually is relatively easy once you have the knack of it.) If you're enrolled in one of Mark's online courses, the demonstration of how to replace this spring is in the Bonus Videos section of his course site, and is called "C2B1 – Sea-Gull Style Shock Springs".
    • If the metal was twice as thick, it wouldn't snap so easily.  The thickness is governed by the space available so you can't use thicker metal.  If you glued two pieces together, the likelihood of snapping would be reduced.  That's my theory anyway, could be wrong. 
    • there are various approaches to learning watch repair. A lot of people want to jump right in and every single watches something to be repaired restored. But other times like this it's disposable it's here for you to learn and when you're through learning you throw it away. yes you definitely should try this you have a learning movement you need to learn and the best way to learn is by doing something.
    • Sorry, the friction will be so great that the wheel will barely turn, if the movement will start at all, the amplitude will be verry lo.
    • If I can’t re-pivot the wheel, the logical thing to do is to descend the pivot hole.  Plan is to either stick a suitably sized hole jewel (from a barrel bridge or something) or fashion a blob of epoxy on the underside of the escape wheel cock so the wheel sits on its one pivot on the base plate and the staff with the broken off pivot (which I’ll polish as best as I can) becomes the upper pivot. As long as it doesn’t foul the 4th wheel it should work? I know it’s a bodge job, and if this were a rare movement, or belonged to someone else I would not do this. I’m just interested to see if I can get the thing to run. 
×
×
  • Create New...