Jump to content

This Forum


Recommended Posts

I used to belong to another forum that initially was a platform for a free exchange of ideas. Unfortunately the forum was hijacked by two horological know-it-all's who were legends in their own minds. If somebody would post an article that had information they never thought of, they would post a response stating that "they were doing it incorrectly" or "they gave incorrect information". Often their post would start out with the phrase "DON'T YOU EVER". The owner of the forum was so impressed with their credentials that he made both of them moderators. Unfortunately for that forum the impressive credentials these two had did not manifest into evidence of either of them having any real horological knowledge. Neither of them ever posted anything of great value to the rest of us who wanted to learn. The forum members who did contribute ended up either leaving  or no longer passed tips and discoveries on to the other members. 

From what I have seen so far, this forum is set up in a much nicer member friendly way. I am glad to have found it and hope it continues to remain that way.

david

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to belong to another forum that initially was a platform for a free exchange of ideas. Unfortunately the forum was hijacked by two horological know-it-all's who were legends in their own minds.

My same experience exactly. Totally different environment here. If you were to name the two hot air ballons I don't think that would be wrong or just PM me for my curiosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious here too David.  Sounds exactly like the forum I left before finding WRT.  jdm, like your name of hot air balloons...I called em "ogres" in my parting letter to management.  Feel very lucky to have the resource of all this shared knowledge here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

If you were to name the two hot air ballons I don't think that would be wrong or just PM me for my curiosity.

Go to PM if you must discuss this sort of thing.

Thanks, Geo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry George, forum hot air ballons aren't really in a position to sue for libel... I call them by that name all the time in the respective forums. But you are right, no need to bring that shame here.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, david said:

From what I have seen so far, this forum is set up in a much nicer member friendly way. I am glad to have found it and hope it continues to remain that way.

David, we always strive to ensure that this forum remains open and friendly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I am quite happy that I know ba (or not a lot) that I would ever take a firm opinionated stance on. I think this forum is excellent from so many different perspectives not the least being humour. No room for stuffed shirts here, however looking at my current shirt straining against my breakfast I think I shall now vanish from this thread.

Cheers,

Vic

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst are the Rolex fanatics..any questions about Rolex from an amateur hobbyist and they are advised to take it to an AD...While they are quality products and regulation is not easy...they are quite simple and well within the scope of an experienced hobbyist to take apart and put together.

Anil

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, anilv said:

The worst are the Rolex fanatics..any questions about Rolex from an amateur hobbyist and they are advised to take it to an AD...While they are quality products and regulation is not easy...they are quite simple and well within the scope of an experienced hobbyist to take apart and put together.

Anil

The thing with Rolex watches is if anything goes wrong and an experienced hobbyist as you like to call them breaks a part it is going to be extremely expensive for that person to put the watch right, in some cases you won't be able to replace the part. While a qualified watchmaker/ repairer working for a living should have  adequate insurance coverage that covers such mishaps. This goes for any expensive watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing with Rolex watches is if anything goes wrong and an experienced hobbyist as you like to call them breaks a part it is going to be extremely expensive for that person to put the watch right, in some cases you won't be able to replace the part. While a qualified watchmaker/ repairer working for a living should have  adequate insurance coverage that covers such mishaps. This goes for any expensive watch.

I don’t think that Rolex are any different from any other watch. Parts are restricted for so many brands but many parts are available, beside is not like one needs parts for any work. We have here some good examples of hobbyists doing successfully with them. That is exactly the spirit of the forum, enabling skills rather than chanting the mantra of "bring it to an AD".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you used Rolex but that is the one I would have picked as back in my days Rolex where the only one that started to restrict supplying parts. I can understand today parts becoming obsolete but what other brands have become restricted.  I need to catch up with modern watchmaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, jdm said:

 

 

I don’t think that Rolex are any different from any other watch. Parts are restricted for so many brands but many parts are available, beside is not like one needs parts for any work. We have here some good examples of hobbyists doing successfully with them. That is exactly the spirit of the forum, enabling skills rather than chanting the mantra of "bring it to an AD".

I disagree with the statement Rolex are no different to any other watch. Having serviced my own Rolex I soon become aware why they are the price they are. However the restriction of parts would make me very nervous servicing a Rolex that was not my own. Unfortunately the same now applies to most swiss watches. I recently serviced/fixed a Breitling that needed a new part fortunately the part was still available but in a year or two this will not be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All comments above re Rolex are very valid but it does little for the hobby and leads to the thinking that Rolex are waayyyy up there in the horological hierarchy...and the price goes up exponentially.

I respect Rolex for the quality of their movements but there price they command nowadays is unrealistic. I was working on a Longines cal.990 recently and it was such a nicely crafted movement....probably not as robust as a Rolex but in my opinion a very nice movement with some advanced features that has been grossly underated.

I have another one (Longines 990) waiting its turn and will post some pictures up here when I get around to it.

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Rolex prices are way to high. For those who want a real quality watch at a reasonable price look at the new Baume & Mercier watches & many jewellers have them now on offer. My brother recently purchased one at a very reasonable price & I am very impressed by it,s quality..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Got another one today! It took 10 weeks, but finally arrived. Fairly complete but I added the pivot guage. The burnisher and bow came with the tool. The case is a bit rough and the tool pretty dirty, but trying to decide how much I want to restore.
    • OK, so long story short, I'm working my way through Mark's courses using a "Sea-gul ST36" (or ST3600 from some vendors) AKA an ETA 6497 clone. as a practice piece.  I've had it fully appart and cleaned it, and have had it fully back together an "running", but only briefly as my oil hadn't arrived at the time.  In the course of that work, I saw no markings on the movement that would tell me if it was a true Sea-gul or just a clone of their clone of the original ETA movement. Well, fast forward to this weekend, when my oils arrived in my mailbox and I sat down to try my hand at oiling.  Everything was going swimmingly until I got to the shock setting on the top of the balance cock.  I was able to open the lyre spring without issue, but in attempting to swing the open to access the cap jewel and chaton, I apparently accidentally pressed the launch button as I sent the lyre spring into low earth orbit.  Like most things that make into such orbits it came back down at a place not too far from where it started, but of course that also means that it is no longer in the setting. So my task is now to get said spring back into setting.  What I have read so far tells me that I seem to have two options: Another thread here seems to indicate that the spring came out without taking the balance cock apart, therefore it should go back without the need for that procedure.  That seems a bit pie in the sky for me, but the posts in said thread also gave some high level information about how to get the spring back in (putting it at an angle to the channel cut in the cock and canted so that the tabs fit in the slots, followed by some "wiggling" to get it turned around the right direction.)  I've tried this a couple of times, which have lead to more trips to low earth orbit, but with successful recovery of the orbital vehicle after each trip.  This thread also suggests that what I did to cause the initial launch was to push the spring "back" with more pressure on one side than the other, which put it under tension and caused it to deform out the slot either on one side or at the end (where there is apparently no "back stop".) The other option appears to be varying degrees of disassembly of the balance cock.  Some things I've read suggest that the whole shock setting needs to come out, while other threads here suggest that I only need to remove the regulator arm and the arm carrying the balance stud.  After the last trip the spring made, this is seeming like a better option, but I'm super short on details on how to do what needs to be done.  if I am following correctly: I need to loose the balance spring stud screw so the stud is not held in the arm. I need to somehow disengage the balance spring from the regulator (all the regulators I've seen in videos look nothing like what I see on the balance cock I have.)  What I've seen on the interwebs is a couple of "pins" that the spring passes through.  What I see on my assembly is something that looks more like a single pin with a "V" shaped notch cut in the bottom of it.  The spring is secured in that notch with something that I guessed was glue, Posts here suggest that on some of these movements glue is in fact used.  So I'm trying to figure out how to tell, how to soften dissolve it (I'm guessing IPA or acetone) and how to put it back when I'm done (superglue?  UV glue?) With the spring detached from the cock, I've read that the regulator and stud carrier are basically glorified C clamps around the shock setting and that one removes them by slipping a razor blade under one side of each and prizing them up.  I assume that they go back in the reverse manner like another C clamp, but that again is only a guess.  The place I got this information from seemed to leave that bit out. Once I have one or both arms off the shock setting the above mentioned post seemed to indicate that I could just slide the spring back in the slot, though again, I'm interpolating between the lines I read.  The alternative that I've seen demonstrated on high end movements on Youtube is to remove the entire shock setting and to replace the spring from "underneath" rotating the setting so that spring basically falls into place. I'm not anxious to try this method, as I don't have a jeweling tool to put the shock setting back into place.  That not to mention that the professional watch maker who did the demonstration described "fiddly work." So at the end of the day I'm looking for a little guidance on which pathway to follow, or if I've missed something obvious, a new direction to follow.  If this is a repair that just need to wait until my skills improve I'm totally good with that, I can get another of these movements in relatively short order, I just don't want to treat this one as disposable, and I do want to make an honest effort at fixing it and learning from this experience. Thank you in advance for reading my ramblings and for any suggestions that you might have!
    • All the best, family always comes first, and I believe you have made the right call that you mother deserves your full attention. However, when you need a little outside distraction the guys here will always be available for some banter or a heated discussion on lubrication 🤣.
    • Wire for what? if it's steel then only certain types of steel can be hardened ie high carbon steels: "Mild steel doesn't harden very well. It doesn't have enough carbon. Get something like O1, silver steel or if you want to go full watchmaker, then Sandvik 20AP". Source
    • I'm wondering if there's any specific type of wire I should get for hardening? I would assume it doesn't matter as long as the wire doesn't melt before it is at temp. 
×
×
  • Create New...