Jump to content

Landeron Chronograph with aftermarket dial - redial?


Recommended Posts

Since June 8th will be my B-Day, and if all goes well I will also become father for the first time (well, that will probably NOT happen on the same day, but I can still wish, can't I?) I decided to pull the trigger on a watch I liked on eBay.

The only issue is that I did so, while surfing the site with my mobile phone, so the pictures were rather small...

Are you starting to get the picture of the issue, here?

Fact is, that after analyzing the seller pics on my PC, I started noticing "strange" things... I will leave the pics talk for themselves... The movement looks ok, as does the case, the permanent seconds hand and minute counter are detached from their pinions, but that was declared in the auction, so no issue.

The issue is that the dial markings appear not to match. Check the tachymeter marking for "60" which logically should be directly over and properly aligned with the 12 hour marking. Is it the picture angle that plays tricks on my eyes, or is it a bit shifted to the right??

I have not received the watch yet, so a personal inspection is yet to be made. Could eventually this be a reason to give the watch back? No mentio on a redial on the auction text... 

What do you experts think?

$_57 (4).JPG

$_57 (5).JPG

$_57 (10).JPG

$_57 (2).JPG

$_57 (3).JPG

$_57 (6).JPG

$_57 (8).JPG

Edited by GeorgeClarkson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things I see that are a bit strange:

- No brand name

- It doesn't say swiss made anywhere

- On the small dial to the left, you can clearly see that the "45" markers aren't aligned

- Strange markings on the outer section of the dial at the 12 o'clock, 1 o'clock and between 2 and 3 o'clock positions

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting. have you compared it to other ebay pics? i'd be curious to see what you find.

yeah - no "swiss made" on it is the first thing i noticed. another thing - the crystal bezel seems to be in remarkeable condition compared to the rest of the case. there's no schmutz on it where it meets the crystal. on the other hand, there is a bit of schmutz on the pushers and crown. could it be a replacement crystal? they might have cleaned up the bezel when they replaced it.

if it is a redial, they did a great job with the patina, but fell short on marking placement. that "12" and "60" misalignment is odd indeed.

frenchie - are the "45"s supposed to line up?

 

oh - and congratulations on fatherhood. there's nothing like that euphoria. and it doesn't go away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, frenchie said:

A few things I see that are a bit strange:

- No brand name

- It doesn't say swiss made anywhere

- On the small dial to the left, you can clearly see that the "45" markers aren't aligned

- Strange markings on the outer section of the dial at the 12 o'clock, 1 o'clock and between 2 and 3 o'clock positions

13 minutes ago, ramrod said:

interesting. have you compared it to other ebay pics? i'd be curious to see what you find.

yeah - no "swiss made" on it is the first thing i noticed. another thing - the crystal bezel seems to be in remarkeable condition compared to the rest of the case. there's no schmutz on it where it meets the crystal. on the other hand, there is a bit of schmutz on the pushers and crown. could it be a replacement crystal? they might have cleaned up the bezel when they replaced it.

if it is a redial, they did a great job with the patina, but fell short on marking placement. that "12" and "60" misalignment is odd indeed.

frenchie - are the "45"s supposed to line up?

 

oh - and congratulations on fatherhood. there's nothing like that euphoria. and it doesn't go away.

Spot on Frenchie on what I noticed too

Ramrod, thanks for the congrats, I am sure this is one thing I will never forget... :)

As per the Patina, actually I believe this is a common dial with normal patina, to which the misaligned markings were applied to make it more interesting.

Whatever the right answer might be, I have some original dials here with me, so it actually does not make any difference. The important thing is that the movement is intact and working well as decribed in the auction and that I can easily replace the dial with an original one (I won't resell the watch, it is for my personal use).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ramrod said:

frenchie - are the "45"s supposed to line up?

Pretty sure...

 

Some links to pictures from a quick google image search:

219-700x400.jpg

 

14dabad2d8dfe075409c4831ccd8805db.jpg

 

One other thing I noticed: you have the 2 and 7 numbers, but not the 4 or the 10, which makes the dial not symmetrical. Should it be something like this??

 163273400_-two-registers-three-color-dia

 

Finally, a link to an ebay listing (not mine, informational only): http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-HYDEPARK-Military-Chronograph-Landeron-48-All-Original-Watch-L8-/371421599832?hash=item567a73d858:g:7QwAAOSwPcVVy26f

 

IMO, all things considered, it's really nitpicking ;) As long as you're happy with it, it will look good on your wrist I'm sure !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I look at the pictures, the more I think it is a redial, and a quite badly made one at that. But nevertheless, I will check it out when it arrives, and if it does look too quirky, I will replace the dial with an original one.

@frenchie: you are right, this is not the first landeron-based chrono I have, and all the ones I possess have the same layout as the ones in the pics you posted.

Attachd a pic of my HEMA Chronograph with Landeron 248 movement that I am wearng at the moment, and my Walker Chrono, also based on a L.248 (pic taken while servicing it).

1.jpg

landeron248_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bobm12 said:

Congratulations on your new baby, Geoge! Is the new watch for him/her? You are getting ahead of yourself!! :D

Cheers,

Bob

It will be a Priincess, so "her".... and no, the watch is for me :P I already prepared something special for her, that I will only show when she'll be old enough to wear it.... ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

And all our fears were correct.... it must be a redial, and a pretty bad one too....

P1010022.JPG

 

Either a redial, or the blue tachymeter scale was applied on a second moment... but please also note from the picture above that the chronograph minute dial hhole, on the right, is not perfectly round, but somewhat oval: it was milled through to better center the minute pinion, which makes me think this dial does not belong at all to this movement, but was later adapted.

Your thoughts?

Edited by GeorgeClarkson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is fascinating.  I always wonder what the thinking was behind actions like that.  A Landeron 248 isn't too uncommon I don't think so it seems strange that so much work would go into making the wrong dial work as opposed to just finding the right one.  On the other hand, it's just these kind of things that get me excited about watch restoration.  It's no fun if the watch you started with didn't have gremlins inside!

Congrats on fatherhood by the way.  I have two princesses of my own.  They're the best thing to ever happen to me.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

This is fascinating.  I always wonder what the thinking was behind actions like that.  A Landeron 248 isn't too uncommon I don't think so it seems strange that so much work would go into making the wrong dial work as opposed to just finding the right one.  On the other hand, it's just these kind of things that get me excited about watch restoration.  It's no fun if the watch you started with didn't have gremlins inside!

Congrats on fatherhood by the way.  I have two princesses of my own.  They're the best thing to ever happen to me.  :)

Hi RyMoeller and thanks for the congrats on my fatherhood, I still cannot wrap my head around it....

As per the thoughts behind a dodgy work like the one done on my watch, I honestly believe that it was a matter of laziness after all. The guy probably had a movement, a case and a dial, wanted to "bake" himself a working watch (probably to sell for a small profit on eBay - which he did btw) and didn't care if the pieces all fit properly together... He probably hoped the new owner didn't know/care/notice the incongruence.

We both got what we wanted, though: he got a bit of money, I got a working movement, a case and a dial to remind me how things "should not be done". I bought this watch actually for the spares.... so no real harm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...


  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
×
×
  • Create New...